Indexed in Journament

Journal of medical systems

ISSN 1573-689X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
44.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #356 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
134 Articles
Scores higher than 98.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name J Med Syst
Abbreviated Name j med syst
ISSN 1573-689X
URL https://www.springer.com/journal/10916

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of medical systems
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.2
Accessibility 20.0 17.8
Timeliness 20.0 15.9
Diversity 72.2 28.2
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 7.9 11.5
Content Distribution 77.6 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (134)

2019
Based Medical Systems for Patient's Authentication: Towards a New Verification Secure Framework Using CIA Standard.
Vol. 43 , No. 7 , pp. 192
611 views DOI Abstract
2020
Design of a Secure Medical Data Sharing Scheme Based on Blockchain.
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 52
582 views DOI Abstract
2020
Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 98
524 views DOI Abstract
2016
A Novel Framework for Medical Web Information Foraging Using Hybrid ACO and Tabu Search.
Vol. 40 , No. 1 , pp. 5
468 views DOI Abstract
2018
Healthcare Blockchain System Using Smart Contracts for Secure Automated Remote Patient Monitoring.
Vol. 42 , No. 7 , pp. 130
465 views DOI Abstract
2020
Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders' Perceptions.
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 62
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
IFHDS: Intelligent Framework for Securing Healthcare BigData.
Vol. 43 , No. 5 , pp. 124
434 views DOI Abstract
2019
Profile of Educational Technology Use by Medical Students and Evaluation of a New Mobile Application Designed for the Study of Human Physiology.
Vol. 43 , No. 10 , pp. 313
420 views DOI Abstract
2023
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine & ChatGPT: De-Tether the Physician.
Vol. 47 , No. 1 , pp. 32
157 views DOI
2020
COVID-19: Prolonged Social Distancing Implementation Strategy Using Blockchain-Based Movement Passes.
Vol. 44 , No. 9 , pp. 165
296 views DOI
2020
A Transparent and Adaptable Method to Extract Colonoscopy and Pathology Data Using Natural Language Processing.
Vol. 44 , No. 9 , pp. 151
317 views DOI Abstract
2020
Transforming Healthcare Cybersecurity from Reactive to Proactive: Current Status and Future Recommendations.
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 98
524 views DOI Abstract
2020
How Can Blockchain Help People in the Event of Pandemics Such as the COVID-19?
Vol. 44 , No. 5 , pp. 102
288 views DOI
2020
Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders' Perceptions.
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 62
461 views DOI Abstract
2020
Design of a Secure Medical Data Sharing Scheme Based on Blockchain.
Vol. 44 , No. 2 , pp. 52
582 views DOI Abstract
2020
An Efficient Mobile-Healthcare Emergency Framework.
Vol. 44 , No. 3 , pp. 58
247 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
44.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #356 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

44.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

72.2/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

77.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.