progress in neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2116 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

progress in neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name progress in neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry
Abbreviated Name progress in neuro-psychopharmacology and biological psychiatry
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (21 total)

2019
Dysfunctional attentional bias and inhibitory control during anti-saccade task in patients with internet gaming disorder: An eye tracking study
Kim, M.
Vol. 95 , pp. 0-0
325 views DOI
2019
Examination of pain threshold and neuropeptides in patients with acute suicide risk
Kim, D.
Vol. 95 , pp. 0-0
317 views DOI Abstract
2010
Neurotrophin-3 gene, intelligence, and selective attention deficit in a Korean sample with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Soo Churl Cho,Hyo-Won Kim,Boong-Nyun Kim,Jae-Won Kim,Min-Sup Shin,Dae-Yeon Cho,Seockhoon Chung,Sun-Woo Jung,Hee Jeong Yoo,In-Won Chung,Un-Sun Chung,Jung-Woo Son;Soo Churl Cho;Hyo-Won Kim;Boong-Nyun Kim;Jae-Won Kim;Min-Sup Shin;Dae-Yeon Cho;Seockhoon Chung;Sun-Woo Jung;Hee Jeong Yoo;In-Won Chung;Un-Sun Chung;Jung-Woo Son;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. 1065-1069
283 views DOI
2020
Abnormal topology of brain functional networks in unipolar depression and bipolar disorder using optimal graph thresholding
Yu, Z.
Vol. 96 , pp. 0-0
282 views DOI
2019
Association between diabetes and mood disorders and the potential use of anti-hyperglycemic agents as antidepressants
Grigolon, R.
Vol. 95 , pp. 0-0
256 views DOI
2020
Atopic dermatitis induces anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors with concomitant neuronal adaptations in brain reward circuits in mice
Yeom, M.
Vol. 98 , pp. 0-0
254 views DOI
2019
P50-N100-P200 sensory gating deficits in adolescents and young adults with autism spectrum disorders
Chien, Y.
Vol. 95 , pp. 0-0
253 views DOI
2020
Dysregulation in IL-6 receptors is associated with upregulated IL-17A related signaling in CD4+ T cells of children with autism
Nadeem, A.
Vol. 97 , pp. 0-0
244 views DOI
2019
Meta-analyses of the functional neural alterations in subjects with Internet gaming disorder: Similarities and differences across different paradigms
Zheng, H.
Vol. 94 , pp. 0-0
244 views DOI
2019
Hypometabolism and altered metabolic connectivity in patients with internet gaming disorder and alcohol use disorder
Kim, H.
Vol. 95 , pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
View All 21 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.