primary care diabetes | Journament

Journal Ranking

#503 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
37
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated منذ 4 أيام

primary care diabetes

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
الفهرسات
ncbi ulakbim sci
الاسم المختصر prim care diabetes
الاسم المختصر primary care diabetes
ISSN 1878-0210
الهدف والنطاق
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/primary-care-diabetes
تعليمات المؤلفين

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (6 total)

2019
Leisure time physical activity is associated with better metabolic control in adults with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study from two public hospitals in Chile
Sadarangani, K.
Vol. 13 , pp. 360-369
372 views DOI
2019
Determinants of glycemic control: Phase 2 analysis from nationwide diabetes report of National Program for Prevention and Control of Diabetes (NPPCD-2018).
Esteghamati, Alireza;Ismail-Beigi, Faramarz;Khaloo, Pegah;Moosaie, Fatemeh;Alemi, Hamid;Mansournia, Mohammad Ali;Afarideh, Mohsen;Janbabaei Molla, Ghasem;Ghadimi, Teyyeb;Shadnoush, Mehdi;Kermanchi, Jamshid;Ghaemi, Fatemeh;
342 views DOI Abstract
2019
The general public's knowledge of diabetes mellitus: A cross-sectional study in Cameroon.
Nansseu, Jobert Richie;Petnga, Saint-Just N;Atangana, Cedric Paterson;Ossa, Alice Sandrine;Sangong, Sidney Ndickmuh Ngasa;Ebendeng, Patrick;Noubiap, Jean Jacques;
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 97-105
279 views DOI Abstract
2019
Glycaemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes followed in a rural African primary care setting - A reality check in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Blum, Johannes;Chaney, Matthew;Mudji, Junior;Mfungwa, Jean-Aimé Kibala;Rice, Timothy;Labhardt, Niklaus Daniel;
243 views DOI Abstract
2015
distribusi spasial arthropoda pada tumbuhan liar di kebun biologi fakultas mipa universitas negeri malang
;Chandra Kirana
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 9-1
234 views Abstract
2016
sinyal intrasel pemicu reorganisasi sitoskeleton sel mast pada reaksi hipersensitivitas tipe i
;Safari Wahyu Jatmiko
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
153 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
37
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

37.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.