Journal of diabetes and its complications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#735 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Journal of diabetes and its complications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name J Diabetes Complications
Abbreviated Name journal of diabetes and its complications
ISSN 1873-460X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/journal-of-diabetes-and-its-complications
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (9 total)

2018
Body fat, metabolic syndrome and hyperglycemia in South Asians.
Misra, A;Soares, Mario J;Mohan, Viswanathan;Anoop, Shajith;Abhishek, Vishnu;Vaidya, Ruchi;Pradeepa, Rajendra;
Vol. 32 , No. 11 , pp. 1068-1075
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Screening and identification of disordered eating in people with type 1 diabetes: A systematic review.
Pursey, Kirrilly M;Hart, Melissa;Jenkins, Laura;McEvoy, Mark;Smart, Carmel E;
, pp. 107522
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Racial differences in trends of serious hypoglycemia among higher risk older adults in US Veterans Health Administration, 2004-2015: Relationship to comorbid conditions, insulin use, and hemoglobin A1c level.
Tseng, Chin-Lin;Aron, David C;Soroka, Orysya;Lu, Shou-En;Myers, Catherine E;Pogach, Leonard M;
, pp. 107475
330 views DOI Abstract
2019
Rapid gastric emptying in diabetes mellitus: Pathophysiology and clinical importance.
Goyal, Raj K;Cristofaro, Vivian;Sullivan, Maryrose P;
, pp. 107414
305 views DOI Abstract
2019
Clinical features and burden of new onset diabetic foot ulcers post simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation and kidney only transplantation
Sharma, A.
Vol. 33 , pp. 662-667
298 views DOI
2017
Hand, shoulder and back stiffness in long-term type 1 diabetes; cross-sectional association with skin collagen advanced glycation end-products. The Dialong study.
Holte, Kristine Bech;Juel, Niels Gunnar;Brox, Jens Ivar;Hanssen, Kristian Folkvord;Fosmark, Dag Sigurd;Sell, David R;Monnier, Vincent M;Berg, Tore Julsrud;
Vol. 31 , No. 9 , pp. 1408-1414
293 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of urinary acidification function with the progression of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Zhu, Huanhuan;Liu, Xi;Zhang, Chengning;Li, Qing;An, Xiaofei;Liu, Simeng;Wu, Lin;Zhang, Bo;Yuan, Yanggang;Xing, Changying;
, pp. 107419
291 views DOI Abstract
2019
Comorbid elevated symptoms of anxiety and depression in adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes: Results from the International Diabetes MILES Study
Nefs, G.
Vol. 33 , pp. 523-529
282 views DOI
2017
Updated risk factors should be used to predict development of diabetes.
Bethel, Mary Angelyn;Hyland, Kristen A;Chacra, Antonio R;Deedwania, Prakash;Fulcher, Gregory R;Holman, Rury R;Jenssen, Trond;Levitt, Naomi S;McMurray, John J V;Boutati, Eleni;Thomas, Laine;Sun, Jie-Lena;Haffner, Steven M;, ;
Vol. 31 , No. 5 , pp. 859-863
90 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.