meta gene | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5409 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 weeks ago

meta gene

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name meta gene
Abbreviated Name meta gene
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (75 total)

2015
ion and mineral concentrations in roots and leaves of two grapevine cultivars as affected by nitric oxide foliar application under nacl stress
;Jafar Amiri;Saeid Eshghi
Vol. 49 , No. 3 , pp. 155-164
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of variants rs7903146 and rs290487 of TCF7L2 gene with diabetic nephropathy and co-morbidities (hypertension and dyslipidemia) in type 2 diabetes mellitus
Abbas, S.
Vol. 20 , pp. 0-0
314 views DOI
2007
thermal imaging as a viable tool for monitoring plant stress
;Manfred Stoll;Hamlyn G. Jones
Vol. 41 , No. 2 , pp. 77-84
307 views DOI Abstract
1973
dosage enzymatique de la di-hydroxyacétone dans les jus de raisins et les vins
;Simone LAFON-LAFOURCADE
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 176-177
282 views DOI Abstract
2004
endogenous levels of abscisic acid in various organs of <em>vitis vinifera</em> l. (cv. cabernet sauvignon) between flower buds separated and grape closed stages
;Tayeb Koussa;Lydia Colin;Michel Broquedis
Vol. 38 , No. 2 , pp. 141-146
281 views DOI Abstract
2015
potential of landrace winery by-products (<i>vitis vinifera l.</i>) as a source of phenolic compounds with antioxidant properties
;Maria Carme Garau;María Reyes González-Centeno;Joana Maria Luna;Antoni Negre;Carmen Rosselló;Antoni Femenia
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 241-251
280 views DOI Abstract
1977
dosage de l'acide salicylique dans les vins par chromatographie en phase gazeuse
;Alain Bertrand;Ch. Sarre
Vol. 11 , No. 4 , pp. 345-350
276 views DOI Abstract
2011
bunch exposure to direct solar radiation increases ortho-diphenol anthocyanins in northern italy climatic condition
;Laura Rustioni;Mara Rossoni;Gabriele Cola;Luigi Mariani;Osvaldo Failla
Vol. 45 , No. 2 , pp. 85-99
267 views DOI Abstract
2012
rapid methods for the evaluation of total phenol content and extractability in intact grape seeds of cabernet-sauvignon: instrumental mechanical properties and ft-nir spectrum
;Luca Rolle;Fabrizio Torchio;Bénédicte Lorrain;Simone Giacosa;Susana Río Segade;Enzo Cagnasso;Vincenzo Gerbi;Pierre-Louis Teissedre
Vol. 46 , No. 1 , pp. 29-40
266 views DOI Abstract
1985
stimulation de la fermentation malolactique par l'addition au vin d'enveloppes cellulaires de levure et différents adjuvants de nature polysaccharidique et azotée
;Aline Lonvaud-Funel;Catherine Desens;Annick Joyeux
Vol. 19 , No. 4 , pp. 229-240
263 views DOI Abstract
View All 75 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.