diabetologia | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2718 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

diabetologia

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name diabetologia
Abbreviated Name diabetologia
ISSN 1432-0428
Aim and Scope
URL http://www.diabetologia-journal.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (35 total)

2020
Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentration in childhood and risk of islet autoimmunity and type 1 diabetes: the TRIGR nested case-control ancillary study.
Miettinen, Maija E;Niinistö, Sari;Erlund, Iris;Cuthbertson, David;Nucci, Anita M;Honkanen, Jarno;Vaarala, Outi;Hyöty, Heikki;Krischer, Jeffrey P;Knip, Mikael;Virtanen, Suvi M;, ;
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
A randomised controlled study of high intensity exercise as a dishabituating stimulus to improve hypoglycaemia awareness in people with type 1 diabetes: a proof-of-concept study.
Farrell, Catriona M;McNeilly, Alison D;Fournier, Paul;Jones, Timothy;Hapca, Simona M;West, Daniel;McCrimmon, Rory J;
380 views DOI Abstract
1997
The effect of moderate exercise on postprandial glucose homeostasis in NIDDM patients
Larsen JJ;Dela F;Kjaer M;Galbo H;;
Vol. 40 , No. 4 , pp. -
377 views Abstract
2019
Preterm birth and risk of type 1 and type 2 diabetes: a national cohort study.
Crump, Casey;Sundquist, Jan;Sundquist, Kristina;
376 views DOI Abstract
2019
Short-term strength and balance training does not improve quality of life but improves functional status in individuals with diabetic peripheral neuropathy: a randomised controlled trial.
Venkataraman, Kavita;Tai, Bee Choo;Khoo, Eric Y H;Tavintharan, Subramaniam;Chandran, Kurumbian;Hwang, Siew Wai;Phua, Melissa S L A;Wee, Hwee Lin;Koh, Gerald C H;Tai, E Shyong;
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
What has zinc transporter 8 autoimmunity taught us about type 1 diabetes?
Williams, Claire L;Long, Anna E;
370 views DOI Abstract
2012
Both resistance- and endurance-type exercise reduce the prevalence of hyperglycaemia in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance and in insulin-treated and non-insulin-treated type 2 diabetic patients
van Dijk JW;Manders RJ;Tummers K;Bonomi AG;Stehouwer CD;Hartgens F;van Loon LJ;;
Vol. 55 , No. 5 , pp. -
363 views Abstract
2019
In search of causal pathways in diabetes: a study using proteomics and genotyping data from a cross-sectional study.
Beijer, Kristina;Nowak, Christoph;Sundström, Johan;Ärnlöv, Johan;Fall, Tove;Lind, Lars;
361 views DOI Abstract
2018
Gluten intake and risk of type 2 diabetes in three large prospective cohort studies of US men and women.
Zong, Geng;Lebwohl, Benjamin;Hu, Frank B;Sampson, Laura;Dougherty, Lauren W;Willett, Walter C;Chan, Andrew T;Sun, Qi;
Vol. 61 , No. 10 , pp. 2164-2173
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association between visit-to-visit variability of HbA and cognitive decline: a pooled analysis of two prospective population-based cohorts.
Yu, Zhe-Bin;Zhu, Yao;Li, Die;Wu, Meng-Yin;Tang, Meng-Ling;Wang, Jian-Bing;Chen, Kun;
343 views DOI Abstract
View All 35 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.