health promotion perspectives | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4897 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

health promotion perspectives

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj
Short Name health promot perspect
Abbreviated Name health promotion perspectives
ISSN 2228-6497
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2015
Pinch Strengths in Healthy Iranian Children and Young Adult Population
Dianat, Iman;Feizi, Hossein;, Kosar Hasan-khali;
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 52-58
421 views Abstract
2019
Do drug package inserts meet the rules and regulations of Iran's Food and Drug Administration in terms of informing patients?
Eteraf-Oskouei, Tahereh;Abdollahpour, Saeid;Najafi, Moslem;Zarea Gavgani, Vahideh;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 214-222
406 views DOI Abstract
2017
The metabolic equivalents of one-mile walking by older adults; implications for health promotion
Gault, Mandy Lucinda;Willems, Mark Elisabeth Theodorus;
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 216-222
399 views Abstract
2019
Time series and trend analysis of brucellosis in Oskou county, East Azerbaijan: 2007-2016.
Rafiemanesh, Hosein;Alimohamadi, Yousef;Hashemi Aghdam, Seyed Rasoul;Safarzadeh, Avaz;Shokri, Abolghasem;Zemestani, Alireza;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 285-290
390 views DOI Abstract
2017
Associations of body-related teasing with weight status, body image, and dieting behavior among Japanese adolescents.
Chisuwa-Hayami, Naomi;Haruki, Toshi;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 80-87
363 views DOI Abstract
2020
Children's literature to promote students' global development and wellbeing.
Pulimeno, Manuela;Piscitelli, Prisco;Colazzo, Salvatore;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 13-23
360 views DOI Abstract
2020
Social media usage and health promoting lifestyle in profile related socio-demographic factors in Turkey.
Güleç, Dilek;Yılmaz Işıkhan, Selen;Orhaner, Emine;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 80-87
341 views DOI Abstract
2019
The need for health diplomacy in health security operations.
Chattu, Vijay Kumar;Kevany, Sebastian;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 161-163
339 views DOI Abstract
2019
Optimizing college health promotion in the digital age: Comparing perceived well-being, and health behaviors, health education needs and preferences between college students enrolled in fully online versus campus-based programss.
Burcin, Michelle M;Armstrong, Shelley N;Early, Jody O;Godwin, Holly;
Vol. 9 , No. 4 , pp. 270-278
333 views DOI Abstract
2018
Relationships between dimensions of fatigue and psychological distress among public hospital nurses
Bazazan, Ahmad;Dianat, Iman;Rastgoo, Leila;Zandi, Hojat;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 195-199
333 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.