archives of disease in childhood | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3426 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

archives of disease in childhood

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name arch dis child
Abbreviated Name arch dis child
ISSN 1468-2044
Aim and Scope
URL http://adc.bmj.com
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (37 total)

1970
Working party to discuss nomenclature based on gestational age and birthweight
;
Vol. 45 , No. 243 , pp. -
524 views Abstract
2000
Community acquired pneumonia--a prospective UK study
Drummond P;Clark J;Wheeler J;Galloway A;Freeman R;Cant A;;
Vol. 83 , No. 5 , pp. -
479 views Abstract
1986
Ribavirin aerosol for acute bronchiolitis
Barry W;Cockburn F;Cornall R;Price JF;Sutherland G;Vardag A;;
Vol. 61 , No. 6 , pp. -
442 views Abstract
2019
Liquid gold: the cost-effectiveness of urine sample collection methods for young precontinent children.
Kaufman, Jonathan;Knight, Andrew Joshua;Bryant, Penelope A;Babl, Franz E;Dalziel, Kim;
402 views DOI Abstract
2019
Preschool respiratory hospital admissions following infant bronchiolitis: a birth cohort study.
Skirrow, Helen;Wincott, Thomas;Cecil, Elizabeth;Bottle, Alex;Costelloe, Ceire;Saxena, Sonia;
Vol. 104 , No. 7 , pp. 658-663
384 views DOI Abstract
2018
Effect of childhood coeliac disease on ninth grade school performance: evidence from a population-based study.
Namatovu, Fredinah;Strandh, Mattias;Ivarsson, Anneli;Nilsson, Karina;
Vol. 103 , No. 2 , pp. 143-148
381 views DOI Abstract
2019
Cost-effectiveness of offering an area-level financial incentive on breast feeding: a within-cluster randomised controlled trial analysis.
Anokye, Nana;Coyle, Kathryn;Relton, Clare;Walters, Stephen;Strong, Mark;Fox-Rushby, Julia;
360 views DOI Abstract
2017
Evidence-based approaches to childhood stunting in low and middle income countries: a systematic review.
Hossain, Muttaquina;Choudhury, Nuzhat;Adib Binte Abdullah, Khaleda;Mondal, Prasenjit;Jackson, Alan A;Walson, Judd;Ahmed, Tahmeed;
Vol. 102 , No. 10 , pp. 903-909
345 views DOI Abstract
2017
the collection coruri by constantin rusnac: its structure and genre features of some miniatures
;COCEAROVA GALINA
, No. 2(31) , pp. 21-28
329 views Abstract
2019
Mortality and respiratory support in X-linked myotubular myopathy: a RECENSUS retrospective analysis.
Graham, Robert J;Muntoni, Francesco;Hughes, Imelda;Yum, Sabrina W;Kuntz, Nancy L;Yang, Michele L;Byrne, Barry J;Prasad, Suyash;Alvarez, Rachel;Genetti, Casie A;Haselkorn, Tmirah;James, Emma S;LaRusso, Laurie B;Noursalehi, Mojtaba;Rico, Salvador;Beggs, Alan H;
322 views DOI Abstract
View All 37 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.