Molecular psychiatry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3330 / 33,958
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Molecular psychiatry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci
Short Name Mol Psychiatry
Abbreviated Name mol psychiatry
ISSN 1476-5578
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.nature.com/mp
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (18 total)

2019
Cellular calcium in bipolar disorder: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Harrison, Paul J;Hall, Nicola;Mould, Arne;Al-Juffali, Noura;Tunbridge, Elizabeth M;
362 views DOI Abstract
2020
The importance of a developmental perspective in Psychiatry: what do recent genetic-epidemiological findings show?
Thapar, Anita;Riglin, Lucy;
358 views DOI Abstract
2019
Extracorporeal apheresis therapy for Alzheimer disease-targeting lipids, stress, and inflammation.
Bornstein, Stefan R;Voit-Bak, Karin;Rosenthal, Peter;Tselmin, Sergey;Julius, Ulrich;Schatz, Ulrike;Boehm, Bernhard O;Thuret, Sandrine;Kempermann, Gerd;Reichmann, Heinz;Chrousos, George P;Licinio, Julio;Wong, Ma-Li;Schally, Andrew V;Straube, Richard;
334 views DOI Abstract
2020
Cytoplasmic-predominant Pten increases microglial activation and synaptic pruning in a murine model with autism-like phenotype.
Sarn, Nicholas;Jaini, Ritika;Thacker, Stetson;Lee, Hyunpil;Dutta, Ranjan;Eng, Charis;
324 views DOI Abstract
2019
White matter disturbances in major depressive disorder: a coordinated analysis across 20 international cohorts in the ENIGMA MDD working group.
van Velzen, Laura S;Kelly, Sinead;Isaev, Dmitry;Aleman, Andre;Aftanas, Lyubomir I;Bauer, Jochen;Baune, Bernhard T;Brak, Ivan V;Carballedo, Angela;Connolly, Colm G;Couvy-Duchesne, Baptiste;Cullen, Kathryn R;Danilenko, Konstantin V;Dannlowski, Udo;Enneking, Verena;Filimonova, Elena;Förster, Katharina;Frodl, Thomas;Gotlib, Ian H;Groenewold, Nynke A;Grotegerd, Dominik;Harris, Mathew A;Hatton, Sean N;Hawkins, Emma L;Hickie, Ian B;Ho, Tiffany C;Jansen, Andreas;Kircher, Tilo;Klimes-Dougan, Bonnie;Kochunov, Peter;Krug, Axel;Lagopoulos, Jim;Lee, Renick;Lett, Tristram A;Li, Meng;MacMaster, Frank P;Martin, Nicholas G;McIntosh, Andrew M;McLellan, Quinn;Meinert, Susanne;Nenadić, Igor;Osipov, Evgeny;Penninx, Brenda W J H;Portella, Maria J;Repple, Jonathan;Roos, Annerine;Sacchet, Matthew D;Sämann, Philipp G;Schnell, Knut;Shen, Xueyi;Sim, Kang;Stein, Dan J;van Tol, Marie-Jose;Tomyshev, Alexander S;Tozzi, Leonardo;Veer, Ilya M;Vermeiren, Robert;Vives-Gilabert, Yolanda;Walter, Henrik;Walter, Martin;van der Wee, Nic J A;van der Werff, Steven J A;Schreiner, Melinda Westlund;Whalley, Heather C;Wright, Margaret J;Yang, Tony T;Zhu, Alyssa;Veltman, Dick J;Thompson, Paul M;Jahanshad, Neda;Schmaal, Lianne;
314 views DOI Abstract
2020
Familial co-aggregation of schizophrenia and eating disorders in Sweden and Denmark.
Zhang, Ruyue;Larsen, Janne Tidselbak;Kuja-Halkola, Ralf;Thornton, Laura;Yao, Shuyang;Larsson, Henrik;Lichtenstein, Paul;Petersen, Liselotte Vogdrup;Bulik, Cynthia M;Bergen, Sarah E;
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychiatric disorders and risk for multiple adverse outcomes: a national prospective study.
Blanco, Carlos;Wall, Melanie M;Hoertel, Nicolas;Krueger, Robert F;Liu, Shang-Min;Grant, Bridget F;Olfson, Mark;
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
The role of parental genotype in predicting offspring years of education: evidence for genetic nurture.
Willoughby, Emily A;McGue, Matt;Iacono, William G;Rustichini, Aldo;Lee, James J;
301 views DOI Abstract
2018
ASD and schizophrenia show distinct developmental profiles in common genetic overlap with population-based social communication difficulties
Pourcain, B.
Vol. 23 , pp. 263-270
296 views DOI
2018
Collaborative meta-analysis finds no evidence of a strong interaction between stress and 5-HTTLPR genotype contributing to the development of depression.
Culverhouse, R C;Saccone, N L;Horton, A C;Ma, Y;Anstey, K J;Banaschewski, T;Burmeister, M;Cohen-Woods, S;Etain, B;Fisher, H L;Goldman, N;Guillaume, S;Horwood, J;Juhasz, G;Lester, K J;Mandelli, L;Middeldorp, C M;Olié, E;Villafuerte, S;Air, T M;Araya, R;Bowes, L;Burns, R;Byrne, E M;Coffey, C;Coventry, W L;Gawronski, K A B;Glei, D;Hatzimanolis, A;Hottenga, J-J;Jaussent, I;Jawahar, C;Jennen-Steinmetz, C;Kramer, J R;Lajnef, M;Little, K;Zu Schwabedissen, H M;Nauck, M;Nederhof, E;Petschner, P;Peyrot, W J;Schwahn, C;Sinnamon, G;Stacey, D;Tian, Y;Toben, C;Van der Auwera, S;Wainwright, N;Wang, J-C;Willemsen, G;Anderson, I M;Arolt, V;Åslund, C;Bagdy, G;Baune, B T;Bellivier, F;Boomsma, D I;Courtet, P;Dannlowski, U;de Geus, E J C;Deakin, J F W;Easteal, S;Eley, T;Fergusson, D M;Goate, A M;Gonda, X;Grabe, H J;Holzman, C;Johnson, E O;Kennedy, M;Laucht, M;Martin, N G;Munafò, M R;Nilsson, K W;Oldehinkel, A J;Olsson, C A;Ormel, J;Otte, C;Patton, G C;Penninx, B W J H;Ritchie, K;Sarchiapone, M;Scheid, J M;Serretti, A;Smit, J H;Stefanis, N C;Surtees, P G;Völzke, H;Weinstein, M;Whooley, M;Nurnberger, J I;Breslau, N;Bierut, L J;
Vol. 23 , No. 1 , pp. 133-142
266 views DOI Abstract
View All 18 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.