Indexed in Journament

biuletyn wojskowej akademii technicznej

ISSN 1234-5865· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #25,895 of 29,330 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 11.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nombre Corto biuletyn wojskowej akademii technicznej
Nombre Abreviado biuletyn wojskowej akademii technicznej
ISSN 1234-5865
URL https://biuletynwat.pl/resources/html/cms/MAINPAGE

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 25.5
Community Impact 4.3
Content Distribution 73.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.3
Accessibility 20.0 18.3
Timeliness 0.0 12.6
Diversity — 27.3
Innovation 25.5 28.9
Community Impact 4.3 9.7
Content Distribution 73.6 88.5
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2017
Inference diagnostic state of the technical object in logic k-valuable
Duer, Stanisław;
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 115-126
360 views Abstract
2018
conservation of the historical town of izmit through the restoration of pertev mehmet pasha mosque
;Chiara Cusolito;Laura Di Marino;Alessia Silvetti
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 196-211
347 views DOI Abstract
2015
architecture: the art of integration
;Marco Sala
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 34-49
334 views Abstract
2018
geographic information systems (gis) based accessibility modeling approach in micro scale considering physically disabled users: case study of mimar muzaffer campus, selcuk university
;Kıvanç Ertuğay
Vol. 6 , pp. 81-104
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
examining the role of cultural landscape in regional development: defining criteria and looking at ephesus
;Gökçe Şimşek
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 42-65
316 views DOI Abstract
2016
innovative approaches in architecture and planning, the future of our past
;Bouzid Boudiaf
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 40-68
288 views Abstract
2013
thinking together urban conservation with urban modernization in the process of urban transformation: the possibilities of "historic urban landscape" concept
;İclal Dinçer
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 22-40
266 views Abstract
2017
the evaluation of cultural identity by the preservation of the historical heritage of saint george in mondonico
;Francesca Andrulli;Chiara Bonaiti;Alessia Silvetti
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 252-267
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
re-defining traditional bazaar areas and shade structures via parametric design methods
;Ahmet Emre Dinçer;İbrahim Bektaş;Abdullah Bilgehan İyican;Abdul Samet Engin
Vol. 5 , pp. 103-116
260 views DOI Abstract
2016
the re-specification of concepts in the morphogenetic approach for property market research
;Fatih Eren
Vol. 4 , No. 2 , pp. 15-34
253 views DOI Abstract
2018
universal design in urban public spaces: the case of zafer pedestrian zone / konya -turkey
;H. Filiz Alkan Meşhur;Bilgehan Yılmaz Çakmak
Vol. 6 , pp. 15-40
193 views DOI Abstract
2018
conservation of the historical town of izmit through the restoration of pertev mehmet pasha mosque
;Chiara Cusolito;Laura Di Marino;Alessia Silvetti
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 196-211
347 views DOI Abstract
2018
user-involved universal design experience in the space, product and service development process
;Mehmet Lutfi Hidayetoglu;Kubra Mensure Muezzinoglu
Vol. 6 , pp. 41-62
196 views DOI Abstract
2018
geographic information systems (gis) based accessibility modeling approach in micro scale considering physically disabled users: case study of mimar muzaffer campus, selcuk university
;Kıvanç Ertuğay
Vol. 6 , pp. 81-104
326 views DOI Abstract
2017
the entrance to trabzon from east gate: tabakhane and ortahisar
;Neva Gerçek Atalay;Bahar Karakaş
Vol. 5 , pp. 77-90
20 views Abstract
2017
examining the role of cultural landscape in regional development: defining criteria and looking at ephesus
;Gökçe Şimşek
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 42-65
316 views DOI Abstract
2017
the evaluation of cultural identity by the preservation of the historical heritage of saint george in mondonico
;Francesca Andrulli;Chiara Bonaiti;Alessia Silvetti
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 252-267
261 views DOI Abstract
2017
re-defining traditional bazaar areas and shade structures via parametric design methods
;Ahmet Emre Dinçer;İbrahim Bektaş;Abdullah Bilgehan İyican;Abdul Samet Engin
Vol. 5 , pp. 103-116
260 views DOI Abstract
2017
analyzing the concept of place attachment in the context of spatıal factors: kuzguncuk, istanbul
;Dilek Özdemir Darby;Tuğçe Özata
Vol. 5 , pp. 18-29
151 views DOI Abstract
2017
Inference diagnostic state of the technical object in logic k-valuable
Duer, Stanisław;
Vol. 66 , No. 1 , pp. 115-126
360 views Abstract
Journament Score
27.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #25,895 of 29,330 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

27.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

25.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

4.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

73.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.