comparative biochemistry and physiology toxicology & pharmacology : cbp | Journament

Journal Ranking

#717 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 gün önce

comparative biochemistry and physiology toxicology & pharmacology : cbp

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indekslemeler
ncbi
Kisa Ad comp biochem physiol c toxicol pharmacol
Kisaltilmis Ad comp biochem physiol c toxicol pharmacol
ISSN 1532-0456
Amac ve Kapsam
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/comparative-biochemistry-and-physiology-part-c-toxicology-and-pharmacology
Yazar Talimatlari

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (91 total)

2019
Characterization of the adenosinergic system in a zebrafish embryo radiotherapy model.
Vol. 224 , pp. 108572
369 views DOI Abstract
2012
geothermal energy of slovakia - co2 emissions reduction contribution potential (background study for conservative and non-conservative approach)
Vol. 17 , No. 4 , pp. 290-299
344 views Abstract
2019
Acute exposure to the water-soluble fraction of gasoline (WSF) affects oxygen consumption, nitrogenous-waste and Mg excretion, and activates anaerobic metabolism in the goldfish Carassius auratus.
, pp. 108590
302 views DOI Abstract
2015
the importance of observation of structural changes of lead acid battery active mass in special applications in the mining industry
Vol. 20 , No. 3 , pp. 165-174
296 views DOI Abstract
2005
comparison of gender relation to information and communication technologies at the to berg faculty
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 331-336
285 views Abstract
2000
theoretical aspects of solid and gaseous substances spreading from sources of exhalations
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 313-318
281 views Abstract
2006
new satellite systems for obtaining data for geographic information systems
Vol. 11 , No. 3 , pp. 192-196
278 views Abstract
2018
Oxidative effects of the acute exposure to a pesticide mixture of cypermethrin and chlorpyrifos on carp and zebrafish - A comparative study.
Vol. 206-207 , pp. 48-53
276 views DOI Abstract
2018
Quantitative analysis of in-vivo responses of reproductive and thyroid endpoints in male goldfish exposed to monocrotophos pesticide.
Vol. 211 , pp. 41-47
273 views DOI Abstract
2004
the measurement of electric properties of silicate minerals
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 113-117
264 views Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.