brain: broad research in artificial intelligence and neuroscience | Journament

Journal Ranking

#7749 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 12 hours ago

brain: broad research in artificial intelligence and neuroscience

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
doaj
Short Name brain: broad research in artificial intelligence and neuroscience
Abbreviated Name brain: broad research in artificial intelligence and neuroscience
ISSN 2067-3957
Aim and Scope
URL http://brain.edusoft.ro
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (31 total)

2012
An Optimized Clustering Approach for Automated Detection of White Matter Lesions in MRI Brain Images
Anitha, M.;Selvy, P. Tamije;
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 19-31
475 views Abstract
2010
Design and Implementation an Autonomous Humanoid Robot Based on Fuzzy Rule-Based Motion Controller
Taheri, Mohsen;Monadjemi, S. A.;Kasaei, S. Alireza Mohades;Kasaei, S. Mohammadreza Mohades;Kasaei, S. Hamidreza Mohades;
Vol. 1 , No. 3 , pp. 57-64
421 views Abstract
2017
Developing Distance Learning Environments in the Context of Cross-Border Cooperation
Fuicu, Sebastian;Popa, Mircea;Dobrilovic, Dalibor;Marcu, Marius;Bogdan, Razvan;
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 52-58
406 views Abstract
2011
Assessment of Human Bio-Behavior During Gait Process Using LifeMOD Software
Rogozea, Liliana;Cristea, Luciana;Cotoros, Diana;Baritz, Mihaela;
Vol. 1 , pp. 169-177
400 views Abstract
2016
Computational Intelligence in a Human Brain Model
Gaftea, Viorel;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 17-24
356 views Abstract
2010
Application Of t-Cherry Junction Trees in Pattern Recognition
Kovacs, Edith;Szantai, Tamas;
Vol. 1 , pp. 40-45
345 views Abstract
2010
Lukasiewicz-Moisil Many-Valued Logic Algebra of Highly-Complex Systems
Glazebrook, James F.;Georgescu, George;Băianu, Ion C.;Brown, Ronald;
Vol. 1 , pp. 1-11
324 views Abstract
2015
estimasi nilai conditional value at risk menggunakan fungsi gaussian copula
;HERLINA HIDAYATI;KOMANG DHARMAWAN;I WAYAN SUMARJAYA
Vol. 4 , No. 4 , pp. 188-194
316 views Abstract
2013
penerapan metode least median square-minimum covariance determinant (lms-mcd) dalam regresi komponen utama
;I PUTU EKA IRAWAN;I KOMANG GDE SUKARSA;NI MADE ASIH
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 6-10
290 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Presence and Activity on Facebook of the Informative Travel Organizations in Romania
Nedelea, Alexandru Mircea;Costea, Mihai;
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 41-48
283 views Abstract
View All 31 Articles
37
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.