Indexed in Journament

journal of cosmetic dermatology

ISSN 1473-2165· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
29.2 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,725 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
13 Articles
Scores higher than 15.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name j cosmet dermatol
Abbreviated Name j cosmet dermatol
ISSN 1473-2165
URL https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14732165

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 0.0 19.2
Diversity 5.6 28.8
Innovation 52.5 31.2
Community Impact 17.9 13.4
Content Distribution 75.5 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (13)

2019
Application of lipidomics to reveal differences of facial skin surface lipids between atopic dermatitis and healthy infants.
Wang, Hecong;Cui, Le;Jia, Yan;Gao, Ying;Zhang, Gaolei;He, Congfen;
472 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anti-aging and brightening effects of a topical treatment containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and raspberry leaf cell culture extract: A split-face, randomized controlled trial.
Rattanawiwatpong, Pattarawan;Wanitphakdeedecha, Rungsima;Bumrungpert, Akkarach;Maiprasert, Mart;
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the efficacy of transdermal drug delivery of calcipotriol plus betamethasone versus tacrolimus in the treatment of vitiligo.
Ibrahim, Zeinab A;Hassan, Ghada F;Elgendy, Hoda Y;Al-Shenawy, Hanan A;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 581-588
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lipidomics analysis of facial skin surface lipids between forehead and cheek: Association between lipidome, TEWL, and pH.
Zhou, Mingyue;Gan, Yao;Yang, Manli;He, Congfen;Jia, Yan;
369 views DOI Abstract
2018
Comparison between the efficacy of microneedling combined with 5-fluorouracil vs microneedling with tacrolimus in the treatment of vitiligo.
Mina, Mary;Elgarhy, Lamia;Al-Saeid, Hanan;Ibrahim, Zeinab;
Vol. 17 , No. 5 , pp. 744-751
367 views DOI Abstract
2020
Non-cutaneous considerations of COVID19 for dermatology practices.
Ali, Faisal R;Al-Niaimi, Firas;
364 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychopathology among individuals seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures.
Özkur, Ezgi;Kıvanç Altunay, İlknur;Aydın, Çiğdem;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?
Ye, CongXiu;Chen, Jian;Yang, SuLian;Yi, JinLing;Chen, HaiYan;Li, MeiRong;Yin, SongChao;Lai, Wei;Zheng, Yue;
313 views DOI Abstract
2020
New emerging dermatological symptoms in coronavirus pandemic.
Gupta, Gaurav;Singh, Yogendra;Kumar Chellappan, Dinesh;Dua, Kamal;
284 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of moisturizing and irritation potential of sacha inchi oil.
Soimee, Wichuda;Nakyai, Wongnapa;Charoensit, Pensri;Grandmottet, Francois;Worasakwutiphong, Saran;Phimnuan, Preeyawass;Viyoch, Jarupa;
264 views DOI Abstract
2020
New emerging dermatological symptoms in coronavirus pandemic.
Gupta, Gaurav;Singh, Yogendra;Kumar Chellappan, Dinesh;Dua, Kamal;
284 views DOI Abstract
2020
Non-cutaneous considerations of COVID19 for dermatology practices.
Ali, Faisal R;Al-Niaimi, Firas;
364 views DOI Abstract
2020
Lipidomics analysis of facial skin surface lipids between forehead and cheek: Association between lipidome, TEWL, and pH.
Zhou, Mingyue;Gan, Yao;Yang, Manli;He, Congfen;Jia, Yan;
369 views DOI Abstract
2020
Anti-aging and brightening effects of a topical treatment containing vitamin C, vitamin E, and raspberry leaf cell culture extract: A split-face, randomized controlled trial.
Rattanawiwatpong, Pattarawan;Wanitphakdeedecha, Rungsima;Bumrungpert, Akkarach;Maiprasert, Mart;
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychopathology among individuals seeking minimally invasive cosmetic procedures.
Özkur, Ezgi;Kıvanç Altunay, İlknur;Aydın, Çiğdem;
353 views DOI Abstract
2019
Application of lipidomics to reveal differences of facial skin surface lipids between atopic dermatitis and healthy infants.
Wang, Hecong;Cui, Le;Jia, Yan;Gao, Ying;Zhang, Gaolei;He, Congfen;
472 views DOI Abstract
2019
Skin sensitivity evaluation: What could impact the assessment results?
Ye, CongXiu;Chen, Jian;Yang, SuLian;Yi, JinLing;Chen, HaiYan;Li, MeiRong;Yin, SongChao;Lai, Wei;Zheng, Yue;
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of the efficacy of transdermal drug delivery of calcipotriol plus betamethasone versus tacrolimus in the treatment of vitiligo.
Ibrahim, Zeinab A;Hassan, Ghada F;Elgendy, Hoda Y;Al-Shenawy, Hanan A;
Vol. 18 , No. 2 , pp. 581-588
393 views DOI Abstract
2019
Evaluation of moisturizing and irritation potential of sacha inchi oil.
Soimee, Wichuda;Nakyai, Wongnapa;Charoensit, Pensri;Grandmottet, Francois;Worasakwutiphong, Saran;Phimnuan, Preeyawass;Viyoch, Jarupa;
264 views DOI Abstract
2018
public debt and its effects on kosovo's economic development
;Adnan Berisha
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 157-166
174 views Abstract
Journament Score
29.2/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,725 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

29.2/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

52.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

17.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.