foot & ankle international | Journament

Journal Ranking

#393 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

foot & ankle international

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ulakbim sci
Short Name foot ankle int
Abbreviated Name foot ankle int
ISSN 1944-7876
Aim and Scope
URL https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/journal/foot-ankle-international
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (10 total)

2018
Scaffold-Based Therapies: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle
Rothrauff BB;Murawski CD;Angthong C;Becher C;Nehrer S;Niemeyer P;Sullivan M;Valderrabano V;Walther M;Ferkel RD; ;;
Vol. 39 , No. 1_suppl , pp. -
404 views Abstract
2013
Functional outcome and limitation of sporting activities after bimalleolar and trimalleolar ankle fractures
Hong CC;Roy SP;Nashi N;Tan KJ;;
Vol. 34 , No. 6 , pp. -
398 views Abstract
2009
Functional outcome after operatively treated ankle fractures in the elderly
Davidovitch RI;Walsh M;Spitzer A;Egol KA;;
Vol. 30 , No. 8 , pp. -
392 views Abstract
2018
Efficacy of Particulated Juvenile Cartilage Allograft Transplantation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus
Dekker TJ;Steele JR;Federer AE;Easley ME;Hamid KS;Adams SB;;
Vol. 39 , No. 3 , pp. -
298 views Abstract
2018
relationship between two panoramic radiography indices and bone mineral density of postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis
;Nader Navabi ;Reza Motaghi ;Mandana Rezazadeh ;Hatam Balooch
Vol. 19 , No. 3 , pp. 181-188
286 views Abstract
2018
immunohistochemical study of p53 expression in patients with erosive and non-erosive oral lichen planus
;Atena Shiva ;Ali Zamanian ;Shahin Arab ;Mahsa Boloki
Vol. 19 , No. 2 , pp. 118-123
280 views Abstract
2018
Use of Patient-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Implants for Complex Foot and Ankle Limb Salvage, Deformity Correction, and Arthrodesis Procedures
Dekker TJ;Steele JR;Federer AE;Hamid KS;Adams SB;;
Vol. 39 , No. 8 , pp. -
271 views Abstract
2019
Range of Normal and Abnormal Syndesmotic Measurements Using Weightbearing CT.
Hagemeijer, Noortje Catharina;Chang, Song Ho;Abdelaziz, Mohamed Elghazy;Casey, Jack Christopher;Waryasz, Gregory Richard;Guss, Daniel;DiGiovanni, Christopher William;
, pp. 1071100719866831
254 views DOI Abstract
2013
Treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus with particulated juvenile cartilage
Coetzee JC;Giza E;Schon LC;Berlet GC;Neufeld S;Stone RM;Wilson EL;;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. -
244 views Abstract
2021
Propensity Score-Matched Analysis of Arthroscopically Assisted Ankle Facture Treatment Versus Conventional Treatment
Baumbach SF;Urresti-Gundlach M;Braunstein M;Borgmann L;Böcker W;Vosseller JT;Polzer H;;
Vol. 42 , No. 4 , pp. -
186 views Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.