Indexed in Journament

biochimica et biophysica acta molecular basis of disease

ISSN 1879-260X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,676 of 29,312 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
8 Articles
Scores higher than 39.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name biochim biophys acta mol basis dis
Abbreviated Name biochim biophys acta mol basis dis
ISSN 1879-260X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/biochimica-et-biophysica-acta-molecular-basis-of-disease

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 28.5
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 85.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for biochimica et biophysica acta molecular basis of disease
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 25.9
Innovation 28.5 27.4
Community Impact 9.3 7.8
Content Distribution 85.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (8)

2019
Placental structure in gestational diabetes mellitus.
, pp. 165535
380 views DOI Abstract
2020
Glycogen storage in a zebrafish Pompe disease model is reduced by 3-BrPA treatment.
Vol. 1866 , No. 5 , pp. 165662
371 views DOI Abstract
2020
What are we talking about when we talk about education and Chagas? A systematic review of the issue.
, pp. 165691
352 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular and cellular bases of diabetes: Focus on type 2 diabetes mouse model-TallyHo.
Vol. 1865 , No. 9 , pp. 2276-2284
311 views DOI Abstract
2015
2020
MeCP2 is involved in random mono-allelic expression for a subset of human autosomal genes.
Vol. 1866 , No. 6 , pp. 165730
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
Acireductone dioxygenase 1 (ADI1) is regulated by cellular iron by a mechanism involving the iron chaperone, PCBP1, with PCBP2 acting as a potential co-chaperone.
, pp. 165844
250 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of urban resiliency in physico-structural dimension of karaj metropolis
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 37-46
190 views Abstract
2020
Acireductone dioxygenase 1 (ADI1) is regulated by cellular iron by a mechanism involving the iron chaperone, PCBP1, with PCBP2 acting as a potential co-chaperone.
, pp. 165844
250 views DOI Abstract
2020
MeCP2 is involved in random mono-allelic expression for a subset of human autosomal genes.
Vol. 1866 , No. 6 , pp. 165730
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
What are we talking about when we talk about education and Chagas? A systematic review of the issue.
, pp. 165691
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
Glycogen storage in a zebrafish Pompe disease model is reduced by 3-BrPA treatment.
Vol. 1866 , No. 5 , pp. 165662
371 views DOI Abstract
2019
Molecular and cellular bases of diabetes: Focus on type 2 diabetes mouse model-TallyHo.
Vol. 1865 , No. 9 , pp. 2276-2284
311 views DOI Abstract
2019
Placental structure in gestational diabetes mellitus.
, pp. 165535
380 views DOI Abstract
2017
evaluation of urban resiliency in physico-structural dimension of karaj metropolis
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. 37-46
190 views Abstract
2015
Journament Score
30.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,676 of 29,312 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

28.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

85.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.