Indexed in Journament

international journal of nursing studies

ISSN 1873-491X· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
41.3/100
Journament Score
#6,829
Journament Rank
41
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name int j nurs stud
Abbreviated Name int j nurs stud
ISSN 1873-491X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-nursing-studies

Indexings

scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (41)

2019
Digital health professions education on chronic wound management: A systematic review.
Martinengo, Laura;Yeo, Natalie Jia Ying;Markandran, Kasturi D/O;Olsson, Maja;Kyaw, Bhone Myint;Car, Lorainne Tudor;
Vol. 104 , pp. 103512
491 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of internal Qigong on quality of life, depressive symptoms and self-efficacy among community-dwelling older adults with chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gouw, Vanessa Xiao Hui;Jiang, Ying;Seah, Betsy;He, Honggu;Hong, Jingfang;Wang, Wenru;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103378
469 views DOI Abstract
2018
Patient-centered care, nurse work environment and implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals: A cross-sectional multi-center study
Bachnick, S.
Vol. 81 , pp. 98-106
463 views DOI
2019
Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review.
Lu, Hong;Zhao, Yang;While, Alison;
Vol. 94 , pp. 21-31
447 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dis/Integrating cultural difference in practice and communication: A qualitative study of host and migrant Registered Nurse perspectives from New Zealand.
Brunton, Margaret;Cook, Catherine;
Vol. 83 , pp. 18-24
429 views DOI Abstract
2019
Efficacy of a video during bed bath simulation on improving the performance of psychomotor skills of nursing undergraduates: A randomized clinical trial.
de Lima Lopes, Juliana;Negrão Baptista, Rui Carlos;Takao Lopes, Camila;Bertelli Rossi, Marina;Swanson, Elizabeth A;Bottura Leite de Barros, Alba Lucia;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103333
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Maintaining skin integrity in the aged: A systematic review.
Lichterfeld-Kottner, A;El Genedy, M;Lahmann, N;Blume-Peytavi, U;Büscher, A;Kottner, J;
Vol. 103 , pp. 103509
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of successful discharge from intensive care units in older adults aged 80 years or older: A population-based study.
Wang, Pei-Yi;Takemura, Naomi;Xu, Xinyi;Cheung, Denise Shuk Ting;Lin, Chia-Chin;
Vol. 100 , pp. 103339
420 views DOI Abstract
2020
Experience of living with pain among older adults with arthritis: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Chen, Jie;Hu, Fen;Yang, Bing Xiang;Cai, Yi;Cong, Xiaomei;
Vol. 111 , pp. 103756
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
How language barriers influence provider workload for home health care professionals: A secondary analysis of interview data.
Squires, Allison;Miner, Sarah;Liang, Eva;Lor, Maichou;Ma, Chenjuan;Witkoski Stimpfel, Amy;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103394
402 views DOI Abstract
2021
The prevalence of frailty among community-dwelling older adults with diabetes: A meta-analysis
Kong LN;Lyu Q;Yao HY;Yang L;Chen SZ;;
Vol. 119 , pp. -
323 views Abstract
2020
Experience of living with pain among older adults with arthritis: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Chen, Jie;Hu, Fen;Yang, Bing Xiang;Cai, Yi;Cong, Xiaomei;
Vol. 111 , pp. 103756
406 views DOI Abstract
2020
Policies on the use of respiratory protection for hospital health workers to protect from coronavirus disease (COVID-19)
Chughtai, A.A.
Vol. 105 , pp. 0-0
169 views DOI
2020
Structured assessments for imminent aggression in mental health and correctional settings: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dickens, Geoffrey L;O'Shea, Laura E;Christensen, Martin;
Vol. 104 , pp. 103526
178 views DOI Abstract
2020
A training program for primary health care nurses on timely diagnosis and management of dementia in general practice: An evaluation study.
Islam, M Mofizul;Parkinson, Anne;Burns, Kelly;Woods, Murphy;Yen, Laurann;
Vol. 105 , pp. 103550
307 views DOI Abstract
2020
How does virtual reality simulation compare to simulated practice in the acquisition of clinical psychomotor skills for pre-registration student nurses? A systematic review
Rourke, S.
Vol. 102 , pp. 0-0
231 views DOI
2020
Nurses as a source of system-level resilience: Secondary analysis of qualitative data from a study of intravenous infusion safety in English hospitals
Vos, J.
Vol. 102 , pp. 0-0
238 views DOI
2020
The quality of quality criteria: Replicating the development of the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ)
Buus, N.
Vol. 102 , pp. 0-0
182 views DOI
2020
Caring for migrant older Moroccans with dementia in Belgium as a complex and dynamic transnational network of informal and professional care: A qualitative study.
Chaouni, Saloua Berdai;Smetcoren, An-Sofie;De Donder, Liesbeth;
Vol. 101 , pp. 103413
303 views DOI Abstract
2020
Exploring the incidence and nature of nursing-sensitive orthopaedic adverse events: A multicenter cohort study using Global Trigger Tool
Hommel, A.
Vol. 102 , pp. 0-0
267 views DOI
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.