international journal of nursing studies | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1281 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

international journal of nursing studies

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name int j nurs stud
Abbreviated Name int j nurs stud
ISSN 1873-491X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/international-journal-of-nursing-studies
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2019
Digital health professions education on chronic wound management: A systematic review.
Martinengo, Laura;Yeo, Natalie Jia Ying;Markandran, Kasturi D/O;Olsson, Maja;Kyaw, Bhone Myint;Car, Lorainne Tudor;
Vol. 104 , pp. 103512
437 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effectiveness of internal Qigong on quality of life, depressive symptoms and self-efficacy among community-dwelling older adults with chronic disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Gouw, Vanessa Xiao Hui;Jiang, Ying;Seah, Betsy;He, Honggu;Hong, Jingfang;Wang, Wenru;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103378
416 views DOI Abstract
2018
Patient-centered care, nurse work environment and implicit rationing of nursing care in Swiss acute care hospitals: A cross-sectional multi-center study
Bachnick, S.
Vol. 81 , pp. 98-106
407 views DOI
2019
Efficacy of a video during bed bath simulation on improving the performance of psychomotor skills of nursing undergraduates: A randomized clinical trial.
de Lima Lopes, Juliana;Negrão Baptista, Rui Carlos;Takao Lopes, Camila;Bertelli Rossi, Marina;Swanson, Elizabeth A;Bottura Leite de Barros, Alba Lucia;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103333
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
Job satisfaction among hospital nurses: A literature review.
Lu, Hong;Zhao, Yang;While, Alison;
Vol. 94 , pp. 21-31
396 views DOI Abstract
2018
Dis/Integrating cultural difference in practice and communication: A qualitative study of host and migrant Registered Nurse perspectives from New Zealand.
Brunton, Margaret;Cook, Catherine;
Vol. 83 , pp. 18-24
375 views DOI Abstract
2019
Maintaining skin integrity in the aged: A systematic review.
Lichterfeld-Kottner, A;El Genedy, M;Lahmann, N;Blume-Peytavi, U;Büscher, A;Kottner, J;
Vol. 103 , pp. 103509
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
How language barriers influence provider workload for home health care professionals: A secondary analysis of interview data.
Squires, Allison;Miner, Sarah;Liang, Eva;Lor, Maichou;Ma, Chenjuan;Witkoski Stimpfel, Amy;
Vol. 99 , pp. 103394
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of successful discharge from intensive care units in older adults aged 80 years or older: A population-based study.
Wang, Pei-Yi;Takemura, Naomi;Xu, Xinyi;Cheung, Denise Shuk Ting;Lin, Chia-Chin;
Vol. 100 , pp. 103339
365 views DOI Abstract
2020
Experience of living with pain among older adults with arthritis: A systematic review and meta-synthesis.
Chen, Jie;Hu, Fen;Yang, Bing Xiang;Cai, Yi;Cong, Xiaomei;
Vol. 111 , pp. 103756
357 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.