pediatric urology case reports | Journament

Journal Ranking

#6516 / 33,973
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated há 1 mês

pediatric urology case reports

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexacoes
Nome Abreviado pediatric urology case reports
Nome Abreviado pediatric urology case reports
ISSN
Objetivo e Escopo
URL
Instrucoes para Autores

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (17 total)

2017
Ectopic adrenal tissue of spermatic cord in a 3- year- old boy, an incidental finding during orchidopexy: A case report
Pigac, Biserka;Mašić, Silvija;Gašparov, Slavko;Mašić, Valentina;
Vol. 4 , No. 6 , pp. 391-394
322 views Abstract
2016
workplace hypertension": focus on emotional and personality traits in patients
;O D Ostroumova;E I Pervichko;Yu P Zinchenko
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 13-20
293 views Abstract
2018
abdominal visceral adipose tissue ultrasound assessmet as a tool in predicting of high cardiometric risk obesity
;M A Druzhilov;O Yu Druzhilova;T Yu Kuznetsova
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 70-75
260 views DOI Abstract
2018
features of diurnal blood pressure profile, arterial stiffness and left ventricular structure and function in patients with arterial hypertension, prediabetes and type 2 diabetes mellitus
;A V Fendrikova;S R Gutova;V V Skibitsky;A V Skibitsky
Vol. 15 , No. 3 , pp. 44-49
250 views DOI Abstract
2016
a fixed combination of amlodipine and losartan: effectiveness and safety in abnormal weather conditions in patients with arterial hypertension
;Ageev F.T.;Smirnova M.D.;Fofanova T.V.
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 19-25
243 views DOI Abstract
2016
prolonged release verapamil: application in clinical practice
;Gaponova N.I.;Abdrakhmanov V.R.
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 64-68
241 views DOI Abstract
2017
reducing cardiovascular risk: an emphasis on rosuvastatin
;Anikin G.S.;Storozhuk I.K.;Filyazova Ya.Yu.
Vol. 14 , No. 4 , pp. 50-54
233 views DOI Abstract
2013
osobennosti techeniya serdechno-sosudistykh zabolevaniy i printsipy vybora ratsional'noy antigipertenzivnoy terapii u bol'nykh khronicheskoy obstruktivnoy bolezn'yu legkikh
;Dmitriy Aleksandrovich Napalkov;Aleksandr Sergeevich Panferov
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 77-79
232 views Abstract
2012
patsient s arterial'noy gipertenziey i assotsiirovannymi klinicheskimi sostoyaniyami: voprosy lecheniya
;O A Kislyak;M S Leont'eva
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 14-17
217 views
2006
blokatory beta-adrenergicheskikh retseptorov v lechenii arterial'noy gipertenzii u bol'nykh s khronicheskoy serdechnoy nedostatochnost'yu
;D V Preobrazhenskiy;E V Tarykina;B A Sidorenko;T A Ermakova;T M Stetsenko;S A Pataraya
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 35-42
212 views Abstract
View All 17 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.