Indexed in Journament

the lancet global health

ISSN 2214-109X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
27.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #24,497 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
27 Articles
Scores higher than 16.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name lancet glob health
Abbreviated Name lancet glob health
ISSN 2214-109X
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-lancet-global-health

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.8
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 29.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for the lancet global health
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.8 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 29.6 88.7
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (27)

2018
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution
3,816 views DOI
2017
Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. e984-e991
555 views Abstract
2014
Does household air pollution from cooking fires affect infant neurodevelopment? Developing methods in the NACER pilot study in rural Guatemala
Vol. 2 , No. S1 , pp. S18-
517 views Abstract
2015
The Disaster Preparedness Program: a new model for sustainable capacity building through civil-military collaboration
Vol. 3 , No. S1 , pp. S7-
500 views Abstract
2017
Incidence of invasive salmonella disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre population-based surveillance study
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. -
468 views Abstract
2017
Continuous positive airway pressure for children with undifferentiated respiratory distress in Ghana: an open-label, cluster, crossover trial
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e615-e623
448 views Abstract
2017
Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series.
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. e984-e991
435 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of facility-based HIV self-testing on uptake of testing among outpatients in Malawi: a cluster-randomised trial.
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e276-e287
424 views DOI Abstract
2018
Informality and health: universal health coverage in the era of SDGs.
Vol. 6 , No. 1 , pp. e22-e23
396 views DOI
2020
Burden of disease in francophone Africa, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017.
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. e341-e351
336 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of facility-based HIV self-testing on uptake of testing among outpatients in Malawi: a cluster-randomised trial.
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e276-e287
424 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interim effect evaluation of the hepatitis C elimination programme in Georgia: a modelling study.
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
Improving public health control of schistosomiasis with a modified WHO strategy: a model-based comparison study.
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. e1414-e1422
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Investing in leadership for universal health coverage.
Vol. 7 , No. 10 , pp. e1287
391 views DOI
2019
Antibiotic prophylaxis in the surgical management of miscarriage in low-income countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis of the AIMS trial.
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. e1280-e1286
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
The epidemiology of sickle cell disease in children recruited in infancy in Kilifi, Kenya: a prospective cohort study.
383 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. e872-e882
394 views DOI Abstract
2019
Bronchiectasis in India: results from the European Multicentre Bronchiectasis Audit and Research Collaboration (EMBARC) and Respiratory Research Network of India Registry.
Vol. 7 , No. 9 , pp. e1269-e1279
356 views DOI Abstract
2019
Socioeconomic status and risk of cardiovascular disease in 20 low-income, middle-income, and high-income countries: the Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiologic (PURE) study.
Vol. 7 , No. 6 , pp. e748-e760
377 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
27.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #24,497 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

27.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

29.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.