the lancet global health | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4839 / 33,968
📉 Poor
Overall Score
37.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

the lancet global health

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name lancet glob health
Abbreviated Name lancet glob health
ISSN 2214-109X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/the-lancet-global-health
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (27 total)

2018
High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: time for a revolution
3,778 views DOI
2017
Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. e984-e991
520 views Abstract
2014
Does household air pollution from cooking fires affect infant neurodevelopment? Developing methods in the NACER pilot study in rural Guatemala
Vol. 2 , No. S1 , pp. S18-
480 views Abstract
2015
The Disaster Preparedness Program: a new model for sustainable capacity building through civil-military collaboration
Vol. 3 , No. S1 , pp. S7-
467 views Abstract
2017
Continuous positive airway pressure for children with undifferentiated respiratory distress in Ghana: an open-label, cluster, crossover trial
Vol. 5 , No. 6 , pp. e615-e623
420 views Abstract
2017
Incidence of invasive salmonella disease in sub-Saharan Africa: a multicentre population-based surveillance study
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. -
388 views Abstract
2017
Global respiratory syncytial virus-associated mortality in young children (RSV GOLD): a retrospective case series.
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. e984-e991
379 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of facility-based HIV self-testing on uptake of testing among outpatients in Malawi: a cluster-randomised trial.
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. e276-e287
372 views DOI Abstract
2019
Occupational health outcomes among international migrant workers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Vol. 7 , No. 7 , pp. e872-e882
369 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
34
75
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

37.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.