Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2882 / 33,957
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
32
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name Clin Nutr
Abbreviated Name clin nutr
ISSN 1532-1983
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/clinical-nutrition
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2019
Nutrition care quality indicators in hospitals and nursing homes: A systematic literature review and critical appraisal of current evidence.
Moick, S;Simon, J;Hiesmayr, M;
474 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interplay between the Mediterranean diet and C-reactive protein genetic polymorphisms towards inflammation in adolescents.
Arouca, Aline B;Meirhaeghe, Aline;Dallongeville, Jean;Moreno, Luis A;Lourenço, Gustavo Jacob;Marcos, Ascensión;Huybrechts, Inge;Manios, Yannis;Lambrinou, Christina-Paulina;Gottrand, Frederic;Kafatos, Anthony;Kersting, Mathilde;Sjöström, Michael;Widhalm, Kurt;Ferrari, Marika;Molnár, Denes;González-Gross, Marcela;Forsner, Maria;De Henauw, Stefaan;Michels, Nathalie;, ;
410 views DOI Abstract
2014
Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and child internalising and externalising problems. The Generation R Study.
Steenweg-de Graaff, Jolien;Tiemeier, Henning;Steegers-Theunissen, Régine P M;Hofman, Albert;Jaddoe, Vincent W V;Verhulst, Frank C;Roza, Sabine J;
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 115-21
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceived barriers to healthy eating and adherence to dietary guidelines: Nationwide study.
de Mestral, Carlos;Khalatbari-Soltani, Saman;Stringhini, Silvia;Marques-Vidal, Pedro;
344 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of nutritional and inflammation risk in hemodialysis patients.
Sá Martins, V;Aguiar, L;Dias, C;Lourenço, P;Pinheiro, T;Velez, B;Borges, N;Adragão, T;Calhau, C;Macário, F;
338 views DOI Abstract
2019
A U-shaped association between serum betaine and incident risk of first ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients.
Xie, Liling;Zhao, Bo-Xin;Luo, Jiajun;Li, Youbao;Zhu, Fengxin;Li, Guo-Feng;He, Mingli;Wang, Binyan;Zhang, Hao;Cai, Yefeng;Huo, Yong;Wang, Xiaobin;Hou, Fan Fan;Xu, Xiping;Qin, Xianhui;Nie, Jing;
336 views DOI Abstract
2018
Title: Differentiating the effects of whey protein and guar gum preloads on postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes.
Watson, Linda E;Phillips, Liza K;Wu, Tongzhi;Bound, Michelle J;Checklin, Helen;Grivell, Jacqueline;Jones, Karen L;Horowitz, Michael;Rayner, Christopher K;
321 views DOI Abstract
2019
Higher malnutrition risk is related to increased intramuscular adipose tissue of the quadriceps in older inpatients: A cross-sectional study.
Akazawa, Naoki;Okawa, Naomi;Hino, Toshikazu;Tsuji, Ryota;Tamura, Kimiyuki;Moriyama, Hideki;
316 views DOI Abstract
2019
Malnourished children acquire nosocomial infections more often and have significantly increased length of hospital stay.
Niseteo, Tena;Hojsak, Iva;Kolaček, Sanja;
289 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of famine exposure with the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.
Liu, Haixia;Chen, Xin;Shi, Tingting;Qu, Guangbo;Zhao, Tianming;Xuan, Kun;Sun, Yehuan;
286 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
32
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.8/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.