Indexed in Journament

Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)

ISSN 1532-1983· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.3 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,967 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 59.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Clin Nutr
Abbreviated Name clin nutr
ISSN 1532-1983
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/clinical-nutrition

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Accessibility 20.0
Timeliness 20.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 60.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Clinical nutrition (Edinburgh, Scotland)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.1
Accessibility 20.0 17.9
Timeliness 20.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 10.7 13.4
Content Distribution 60.4 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2019
Interplay between the Mediterranean diet and C-reactive protein genetic polymorphisms towards inflammation in adolescents.
473 views DOI Abstract
2014
Maternal dietary patterns during pregnancy and child internalising and externalising problems. The Generation R Study.
Vol. 33 , No. 1 , pp. 115-21
410 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceived barriers to healthy eating and adherence to dietary guidelines: Nationwide study.
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
A U-shaped association between serum betaine and incident risk of first ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of nutritional and inflammation risk in hemodialysis patients.
387 views DOI Abstract
2018
Title: Differentiating the effects of whey protein and guar gum preloads on postprandial glycemia in type 2 diabetes.
384 views DOI Abstract
2019
Higher malnutrition risk is related to increased intramuscular adipose tissue of the quadriceps in older inpatients: A cross-sectional study.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of famine exposure with the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.
322 views DOI Abstract
2023
Cystic fibrosis related bone disease in children: Can it be predicted?
Vol. 42 , No. 9 , pp. 1631-1636
102 views DOI Abstract
2019
Perceived barriers to healthy eating and adherence to dietary guidelines: Nationwide study.
396 views DOI Abstract
2019
A U-shaped association between serum betaine and incident risk of first ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients.
389 views DOI Abstract
2019
Higher malnutrition risk is related to increased intramuscular adipose tissue of the quadriceps in older inpatients: A cross-sectional study.
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Predictors of nutritional and inflammation risk in hemodialysis patients.
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interplay between the Mediterranean diet and C-reactive protein genetic polymorphisms towards inflammation in adolescents.
473 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association of famine exposure with the risk of type 2 diabetes: A meta-analysis.
322 views DOI Abstract
2018
Soft drink consumption and gestational diabetes risk in the SUN project.
Vol. 37 , No. 2 , pp. 638-645
113 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.3/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,967 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

36.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

60.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.