proceedings of 2018 ieee 7th data driven control and learning systems conference, ddcls 2018 | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1824 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 day ago

proceedings of 2018 ieee 7th data driven control and learning systems conference, ddcls 2018

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name proceedings of 2018 ieee 7th data driven control and learning systems conference, ddcls 2018
Abbreviated Name proceedings of 2018 ieee 7th data driven control and learning systems conference, ddcls 2018
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (14 total)

2014
regulation of extracellular matrix in patients with q-wave myocardial infarction after thrombolytic therapy
;V. D. Syvolap ;S. M. Kyselov
, No. 1 , pp. 56-58
412 views DOI Abstract
2017
features of estimation of left ventricular geometry in patients with arterial hypertension
;V. V. Syvolap;Ye. V. Novikov;V. A. Lysenko;A. O. Bogun
, No. 3 , pp. 257-262
334 views DOI Abstract
2013
analysis of intravitreal using of anti vegf-medications for diseases of fundus accompanied by exudation and neovascularization
;N. G. Zavgorodnya; I. A. Poplavska;S.L. Shevluk;D.V. Martynov
, No. 2 , pp. 49-52
265 views DOI Abstract
2012
surgical treatment of postoperative complications in patients with atherosclerosis of aorta and low extremities' arteries
;V.O. Gubka
, No. 1 , pp. 89-91
256 views DOI Abstract
2017
comparative characteristics of immunohistochemical detection of m. tuberculosis antigens and mycobacteria by ziehl–neelsen method in lung tissue with tuberculoma during progressive course of tuberculosis
;I. V. Liskina;O. A. Melnik; L. M. Zahaba; S. D. Kuzovkova;V. V. Kuts
, No. 3 , pp. 337-343
242 views DOI Abstract
2014
analysis of advanced non-small cell lung cancer course during high dose antiestrogen therapy use in complex chemoradiotherapy treatment of patients
;A. V. Kadzhoian
, No. 3 , pp. 100-104
240 views DOI Abstract
2015
morphological state of aorta in the fetuses and newborns suffered from chronic intrauterine hypoxia (experimental research)
;O. V. Kaluzhina
, No. 1 , pp. 17-19
239 views DOI Abstract
2017
immunohistochemical characteristic of expression levels of kі-67, p16ink4a, hpv16 in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical cancer
;V. A. Tumanskiy;Z. A. Pyrogova
, No. 2 , pp. 202-208
237 views DOI Abstract
2018
Model Free adaptive perimeter control for two-region urban traffic system with input and output constraints
Lei, T.
, pp. 757-762
214 views DOI
2012
change of lipid peroxidation and antioxidant system at the development of experimental peritonitis
;Yu. A. Ermola
, No. 2 , pp. 92-94
199 views DOI Abstract
View All 14 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.8/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.