canadian journal of surgery journal canadien de chirurgie | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1701 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.8/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

canadian journal of surgery journal canadien de chirurgie

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name can j surg
Abbreviated Name canadian journal of surgery journal canadien de chirurgie
ISSN 1488-2310
Aim and Scope
URL http://canjsurg.ca
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (13 total)

2019
Improving value and access to specialty medical care for families: a pediatric surgery telehealth program
Dean, Paige;O’Donnell, Maureen;Zhou, Lenny;Skarsgard, Erik D.;
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 005919
397 views DOI Abstract
2019
Use of instrumented lumbar spinal surgery for degenerative conditions: trends and costs over time in Ontario, Canada
Xu, Yan;Yen, David;Whitehead, Marlo;Xu, Jianfeng;Johnson, Ana P.;
Vol. 62 , No. 6 , pp. 017016
294 views DOI Abstract
2017
conservative treatment using an endoscopic pancreatic stent in a patient with delayed diagnosis of pancreatic injury after blunt trauma: a case report
;Se Hun Kim;Ki Hoon Kim
Vol. 7 , pp. 15-18
261 views Abstract
2018
use of idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal: emergency department experience in two cases with subdural haematoma
;Gail Edwards;Cristina Roman;Rondhir Jithoo;Biswadev Mitra
Vol. 13 , No. C , pp. 46-49
235 views DOI Abstract
2019
The impact of a new hepatopancreatobiliary surgery program on the management of pancreatic cancer at Health Sciences North
Hartford, L.
Vol. 62 , pp. 275-280
227 views
2016
case report-delayed splenic rupture in combination with medial femoral neck fracture after low energy trauma. development of hemorrhagic shock 5 days after hip prosthesis due to a rare cause
;M. Leiblein;D. Ullrich;N. Habbe;M. Keese;I. Marzi;M. Lehnert
Vol. 2 , pp. 1-5
223 views Abstract
2017
a rare case of hoffa fracture combined with lateral patellar dislocation
;Martin C. Jordan;Leonie A. Bittrich;Kai Fehske;Rainer H. Meffert;Hendrik Jansen
Vol. 9 , pp. 13-16
208 views Abstract
2017
jahss type one posterior first metatarsophalangeal dislocation treated with open reduction without fixation: a case report
;Ahmed Saeed Younis;Fady Michael;Yasser Reda;Moheeb Hamdy
Vol. 12 , No. C , pp. 54-58
206 views DOI
2020
chylothorax caused by blunt trauma: case review and management proposal
;Brandon T. Bacon;Wayne Mashas
Vol. 28 , pp. 100308-
200 views Abstract
2017
primary repair of a delayed presentation thoracic oesophageal gunshot injury: a report of two cases
;Takeshi Omura;Mohammed Asieri;Kirsten Bischof;Sharan Rambarran;Maeyane Stephens Moeng
Vol. 12 , No. C , pp. 45-47
198 views DOI Abstract
View All 13 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.