Journal of advanced nursing | Journament

Journal Ranking

#5348 / 33,959
📉 Poor
Overall Score
35.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
75
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Journal of advanced nursing

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim sci soc
Short Name J Adv Nurs
Abbreviated Name j adv nurs
ISSN 1365-2648
Aim and Scope
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291365-2648
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (41 total)

2008
The qualitative content analysis process
Satu Elo; Helvi Kyngäs
21,004 views DOI
2019
A systematic review of adherence to diabetes self-care behaviours: Evidence from low- and middle-income countries.
Mogre, Victor;Johnson, Natalie A;Tzelepis, Flora;Shaw, Jonathan E;Paul, Christine;
467 views DOI Abstract
2019
A mixed methods study to evaluate the effects of a teamwork enhancement and quality improvement initiative on nurses' work environment.
Paguio, Jenniffer Torralba;Doris, Yu Sau Fung;
431 views DOI Abstract
2019
Integrative review; identifying the evidence base for policymaking and analysis in health care.
Kennedy, Catriona;O'Reilly, Pauline;O'Connell, Rhona;O'Leary, Denise;Fealy, Gerard;Hegarty, Josephine-Mary;Brady, Anne-Marie;Nicholson, Emma;McNamara, Martin;Casey, Mary;
Vol. 75 , No. 12 , pp. 3231-3245
409 views DOI Abstract
2019
Structural empowerment is a strong predictor of organisational commitment in nurses: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Fragkos, Konstantinos C;Makrykosta, Pinelopi;Frangos, Christos C;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Postpartum breastfeeding experiences in the traditional-biomedical crossroads: A qualitative study using drawing with Vietnamese and Myanmarese refugee women in Australia.
Joseph, June;Liamputtong, Pranee;Brodribb, Wendy;
395 views DOI Abstract
2019
Patient safety culture among European cancer nurses - an exploratory, cross-sectional survey comparing data from Estonia, Germany, Netherlands and United Kingdom.
Sharp, Lena;Rannus, Kristi;Olofsson, Anna;Kelly, Daniel;Oldenmenger, Wendy H;, ;
393 views DOI Abstract
2020
The effect of mindfulness training on burnout syndrome in nursing: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Suleiman-Martos, Nora;Gomez-Urquiza, Jose L;Aguayo-Estremera, Raimundo;Cañadas-De La Fuente, Guillermo A;De La Fuente-Solana, Emilia I;Albendín-García, Luis;
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
A coordinated preventive care approach for healthy ageing in five European cities: A mixed methods study of process evaluation components.
Franse, Carmen B;Zhang, Xuxi;van Grieken, Amy;Rietjens, Judith;Alhambra-Borrás, Tamara;Durá, Estrella;Garcés-Ferrer, Jorge;van Staveren, Rob;Rentoumis, Tasos;Markaki, Athina;Bilajac, Lovorka;Vasiljev Marchesi, Vanja;Rukavina, Tomislav;Verma, Arpana;Williams, Greg;Clough, Gary;Koppelaar, Elin;Martijn, Rens;Mattace Raso, Francesco;Voorham, Antonius J J;Raat, Hein;
Vol. 75 , No. 12 , pp. 3689-3701
385 views DOI Abstract
2019
Lifestyle risk factor communication by nurses in general practice: Understanding the interactional elements.
James, Sharon;Mcinnes, Susan;Halcomb, Elizabeth;Desborough, Jane;
384 views DOI Abstract
View All 41 Articles
36
Overall
Poor
31
35
30
40
35
75
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

35.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

75.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.