JAMA network open | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2844 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

JAMA network open

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi
Short Name JAMA Netw Open
Abbreviated Name jama netw open
ISSN 2574-3805
Aim and Scope
URL https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamanetworkopen
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (86 total)

2019
Association of Maternal Age With Severe Maternal Morbidity and Mortality in Canada.
Aoyama, Kazuyoshi;Pinto, Ruxandra;Ray, Joel G;Hill, Andrea D;Scales, Damon C;Lapinsky, Stephen E;Hladunewich, Michelle A;Seaward, Gareth R;Fowler, Robert A;
Vol. 2 , No. 8 , pp. e199875
481 views DOI Abstract
2020
Assessment of Community-Level Disparities in Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infections and Deaths in Large US Metropolitan Areas
Adhikari S;Pantaleo NP;Feldman JM;Ogedegbe O;Thorpe L;Troxel AB;;
Vol. 3 , No. 7 , pp. -
430 views Abstract
2013
popular misconceptions regarding the diabetes management: where should we focus our attention?
; Rajkumar Patil;Nasrin Nisha A ;Shib Sekhar Datta;Abhijit V Boratne;Lokeshmaran
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 287-291
427 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association Between Rotavirus Vaccination and Risk of Intussusception Among Neonates and Infants: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lu, Hai-Ling;Ding, Ying;Goyal, Hemant;Xu, Hua-Guo;
Vol. 2 , No. 10 , pp. e1912458
400 views DOI Abstract
2019
Newspaper Adherence to Media Reporting Guidelines for the Suicide Deaths of Kate Spade and Anthony Bourdain.
Sheftall, Arielle H;Tissue, Jaclyn L;Schlagbaum, Paige;Singer, Jonathan B;Young, Nerissa;Stevens, Jack H;Ackerman, John P;
Vol. 2 , No. 11 , pp. e1914517
397 views DOI
2019
Health Outcomes Among Long-term Opioid Users With Testosterone Prescription in the Veterans Health Administration.
Jasuja, Guneet K;Ameli, Omid;Reisman, Joel I;Rose, Adam J;Miller, Donald R;Berlowitz, Dan R;Bhasin, Shalender;
Vol. 2 , No. 12 , pp. e1917141
367 views DOI Abstract
2015
prevalence of osteosclerosis among patients visiting dental institute in rural area of western india
;Jitender Solanki;Rahul Jain;Ravinder Singh;Sarika Gupta;Ashtha Arya;Deepak Tomar
Vol. 9 , No. 8 , pp. ZC38-ZC40
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
Contemporary Views of Research Participant Willingness to Participate and Share Digital Data in Biomedical Research.
Pratap, Abhishek;Allred, Ryan;Duffy, Jaden;Rivera, Donovan;Lee, Heather Sophia;Renn, Brenna N;Areán, Patricia A;
Vol. 2 , No. 11 , pp. e1915717
362 views DOI Abstract
2019
Estimation of Eating Disorders Prevalence by Age and Associations With Mortality in a Simulated Nationally Representative US Cohort.
Ward, Zachary J;Rodriguez, Patricia;Wright, Davene R;Austin, S Bryn;Long, Michael W;
Vol. 2 , No. 10 , pp. e1912925
352 views DOI Abstract
2020
Effect of High vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized With Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Borba MGS;Val FFA;Sampaio VS;Alexandre MAA;Melo GC;Brito M;Mourão MPG;Brito-Sousa JD;Baía-da-Silva D;Guerra MVF;Hajjar LA;Pinto RC;Balieiro AAS;Pacheco AGF;Santos JDO;Naveca FG;Xavier MS;Siqueira AM;Schwarzbold A;Croda J;Nogueira ML;Romero GAS;Bassat Q;Fontes CJ;Albuquerque BC;Daniel-Ribeiro CT;Monteiro WM;Lacerda MVG; ;;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. -
347 views Abstract
View All 86 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
35
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.3/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.