environmental nanotechnology, monitoring and management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#335 / 33,811
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.3/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
31
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 20 hours ago

environmental nanotechnology, monitoring and management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name environmental nanotechnology, monitoring and management
Abbreviated Name environmental nanotechnology, monitoring and management
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (20 total)

2018
Utilization of Persea americana (Avocado) oil for the synthesis of gold nanoparticles in sunlight and evaluation of antioxidant and photocatalytic activities
Kumar B.
Vol. 10 , pp. 231-237
400 views DOI
2016
heat and mass transfer effects on mhd viscoelastic fluid over a stretching sheet through porous medium in presence of chemical reaction
;Manoj Kumar Nayak;Gauranga Charan Dash;Lambodar Prased Singh
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 70-80
287 views DOI Abstract
2016
the effects of cross-diffusion and radiation on mixed convection from a vertical flat plate embedded in a fluid-saturated porous medium in the presence of viscous dissipation
;Mohammed A. Mohammed Ahmed;Mohammed E. Mohammed;Ahmed A. Khidir
Vol. 5 , No. 2 , pp. 149-163
279 views DOI Abstract
2013
numerical study on film cooling mechanism and characteristics of cylindrical holes with branched jet injections
;Yu Yao;Jingzhou Zhang;Yang Yang
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 30-37
245 views DOI Abstract
2019
Control synthesis of metallic gold nanoparticles homogeneously distributed on hexagonal ZnO nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue dye
Ahmed M.
Vol. 12 , pp. 0-0
237 views DOI
2016
interlayer shear effect on vibrational behavior of bilayer graphene using the molecular mechanics simulation
;Mina Mirparizi;FarshadShakeri Aski
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 250-260
230 views DOI Abstract
2017
analytical investigation of steady three-dimensional problem of condensation film on inclined rotating disk by akbari-ganji's methodanalytical investigation of steady three-dimensional problem of condensation film on inclined rotating disk by akbari-ganji's methodretain-->
;S. Berkan;S.R. Hoseini;D.D. Ganji
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 277-284
222 views DOI Abstract
2016
nozzle geometry variations on the discharge coefficient
;M.M.A. Alam;T. Setoguchi;S. Matsuo;H.D. Kim
Vol. 5 , No. 1 , pp. 22-33
208 views DOI Abstract
2012
an experimental investigation on the trailing edge cooling of turbine blades
;Zifeng Yang;Hui Hu
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 36-47
206 views DOI Abstract
2014
numerical simulations of single and multi-staged injection of h2 in a supersonic scramjet combustor
;L. Abu-Farah;O.J. Haidn;H.-P. Kau
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 175-186
189 views DOI Abstract
View All 20 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
31
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.3/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

31.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.