Managed Journal — submissions, peer review and publication all run on Journament Journal information & author guidelines
Managed on Journament

Journament Editorial Module Verification (TEST)

EN

Editor-in-Chief: Said Nadeem

15.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #29,318 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
Scores higher than 0% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Internal test journal used to verify the AI peer review pipeline in production.
Short Name JEMV-TEST

Quality Profile

3 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Innovation 7.0
Community Impact 0.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

9 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 3 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journament Editorial Module Verification (TEST)
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.1
Accessibility 17.9
Timeliness 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 7.0 31.2
Community Impact 0.0 13.4
Content Distribution 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Current Issue

Awaiting the editorial team

The table of contents of the latest published issue will appear here — article titles, authors, pages and DOIs, each linking to the full record.

Editorial Board

S
Editor-in-Chief

For Authors

Full information

Sections open for submission

Research Articles Review Articles Short Communications Editorials
Awaiting the editorial team

Manuscript structure, word limits, figure and table requirements, reference style and the revision policy will be published here for authors.

Submit Your Manuscript

Peer Review Process

Review modelDouble-blind (authors and reviewers anonymous)
Reviews per round2
Reviewer deadline21 days
Editorial decision target60 days from submission
AI screening Every submission receives a structured AI screening report alongside human peer review. The editorial decision is always made by a human editor.

Article Processing Charges

No charge to authors

Publication Ethics & Policies

Awaiting the editorial team

Authorship criteria, how misconduct is handled, corrections and retractions, similarity screening, the licence readers receive and who holds copyright will all be stated here.

Articles (0)

No articles found
This journal doesn't have any indexed articles yet.
Journament Score
15.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #29,318 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

15.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

7.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

Not yet measured

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.