Indexed in Journament

revista brasileira de enfermagem

ISSN 0034-7167· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #15,314 of 29,324 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
38 Articles
Scores higher than 47.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name rev bras enferm
Abbreviated Name rev bras enferm
ISSN 0034-7167
URL http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=0034-7167&lng=en&nrm=iso

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for revista brasileira de enfermagem
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 20.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.9 7.8
Content Distribution 72.0 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (38)

2019
Charismatic leadership among nursing professionals: an integrative review.
Vol. 72 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 315-320
562 views DOI Abstract
Digital technologies for promotion of healthy eating habits in teenagers.
Vol. 72 , No. 2 , pp. 513-520
452 views DOI Abstract
2019
Interprofessional Practice in the Emergency Service: specific and shared assignments of nurses.
Vol. 72 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 213-220
432 views DOI Abstract
2019
Social Determinants of Health and their influence on the choice of birth control methods.
Vol. 72 , No. 4 , pp. 1044-1051
422 views DOI Abstract
1996
O significado da nutrição parenteral para o cliente no contexto hospitalar
Vol. 49 , No. 2 , pp. 239-258
408 views Abstract
2019
Best Practices in Historical Studies of Nursing and Health (1999-2017).
Vol. 72 , No. 4 , pp. 973-978
400 views DOI Abstract
2020
The theme of violence in nursing theses from the view of technological toolboxes.
Vol. 73 , No. 1 , pp. e20180018
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Waiting for a miracle": Spirituality/Religiosity in coping with sickle cell disease.
Vol. 72 , No. 6 , pp. 1554-1561
377 views DOI Abstract
2024
Continuing nursing education actions in the face of homophobia: an integrative review
Vol. 77Suppl 3 , pp. e20230094
77 views DOI
2020
Assessment of safety culture in organ donation.
Vol. 73 , No. 2 , pp. e20180514
327 views DOI Abstract
2020
The theme of violence in nursing theses from the view of technological toolboxes.
Vol. 73 , No. 1 , pp. e20180018
387 views DOI Abstract
2019
Spatial analysis on tuberculosis and the network of primary health care.
Vol. 72 , No. 5 , pp. 1197-1202
335 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mobile health technology for gestational care: evaluation of the GestAção's app.
Vol. 72 , No. suppl 3 , pp. 266-273
332 views DOI Abstract
2019
Degree in Nursing: education through problem-based learning
Vol. 72 , pp. 1071-1077
115 views DOI
2019
Development of a journal club on the Nursing management process.
Vol. 72 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 221-227
366 views DOI Abstract
2019
"Waiting for a miracle": Spirituality/Religiosity in coping with sickle cell disease.
Vol. 72 , No. 6 , pp. 1554-1561
377 views DOI Abstract
2019
Charismatic leadership among nursing professionals: an integrative review.
Vol. 72 , No. suppl 1 , pp. 315-320
562 views DOI Abstract
2019
Best Practices in Historical Studies of Nursing and Health (1999-2017).
Vol. 72 , No. 4 , pp. 973-978
400 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #15,314 of 29,324 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

20.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

72.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.