Indexed in Journament

sociology of health & illness

ISSN 1467-9566· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.9 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #3,219 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 89% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name sociol health illn
Abbreviated Name sociol health illn
ISSN 1467-9566
URL http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9566

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity 55.6 22.7
Innovation 61.5 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 4.2
Content Distribution 69.8 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2019
Female family carers' experiences of violent, abusive or harmful behaviour by the older person for whom they care: a case of epistemic injustice?
Isham, Louise;Bradbury-Jones, Caroline;Hewison, Alistair;
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
Navigating the cartographies of trust: how patients and carers establish the credibility of online treatment claims.
Petersen, Alan;Tanner, Claire;Munsie, Megan;
Vol. 41 Suppl 1 , pp. 50-64
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
The patient-doctor relationship in the transnational healthcare context.
Skountridaki, Lila;
388 views DOI Abstract
2012
daily newspapers and public opinion on the eu and croatian integration process – an agenda setting perspective
;Monija Ivanković
Vol. 3 , No. 5 , pp. 19-33
372 views Abstract
2019
Healing architecture and psychiatric practice: (re)ordering work and space in an in-patient ward in Denmark.
Simonsen, Thorben P;Duff, Cameron;
351 views DOI Abstract
2017
Engaging conceptions of identity in a context of medical pluralism: explaining treatment choices for everyday illness in Niger.
Sams, Kelley;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 1100-1116
345 views DOI Abstract
2019
Parents' constructions of normality and pathology in child mental health assessments.
O'Reilly, Michelle;Muskett, Tom;Karim, Khalid;Lester, Jessica N;
329 views DOI Abstract
2014
the applicability of the transparency principle by organizations in crisis situations
;Zarfa Hrnjić Kuduzović
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. 87-102
298 views Abstract
2010
conceptual metaphors in political interviews
;Nikolina Borčić
Vol. 1 , No. 1-2 , pp. 136-156
293 views Abstract
2012
curation pedagogy for media studies: (further) towards the inexpert
;Ben Andrews;Julian McDougall
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 152-166
254 views Abstract
2019
Parents' constructions of normality and pathology in child mental health assessments.
O'Reilly, Michelle;Muskett, Tom;Karim, Khalid;Lester, Jessica N;
329 views DOI Abstract
2019
Navigating the cartographies of trust: how patients and carers establish the credibility of online treatment claims.
Petersen, Alan;Tanner, Claire;Munsie, Megan;
Vol. 41 Suppl 1 , pp. 50-64
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Healing architecture and psychiatric practice: (re)ordering work and space in an in-patient ward in Denmark.
Simonsen, Thorben P;Duff, Cameron;
351 views DOI Abstract
2019
Female family carers' experiences of violent, abusive or harmful behaviour by the older person for whom they care: a case of epistemic injustice?
Isham, Louise;Bradbury-Jones, Caroline;Hewison, Alistair;
420 views DOI Abstract
2019
The patient-doctor relationship in the transnational healthcare context.
Skountridaki, Lila;
388 views DOI Abstract
2017
Engaging conceptions of identity in a context of medical pluralism: explaining treatment choices for everyday illness in Niger.
Sams, Kelley;
Vol. 39 , No. 7 , pp. 1100-1116
345 views DOI Abstract
2015
participation or new media use first? reconsidering the role of new media in civic practices in the czech republic
;Jakub Macek;Alena Macková;Johana Kotišová
Vol. 6 , No. 11 , pp. 68-83
218 views Abstract
2014
the applicability of the transparency principle by organizations in crisis situations
;Zarfa Hrnjić Kuduzović
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. 87-102
298 views Abstract
2014
tisak u krizi: analiza trendova u hrvatskoj od 2008. do 2013.
;Dina Vozab
Vol. 5 , No. 10 , pp. 139-147
125 views
2012
understanding online audio-visual content: a european initiative, media literacy and the user
;Sian Barber
Vol. 3 , No. 6 , pp. 28-41
236 views Abstract
Journament Score
36.9/100 · Poor
Ranked #3,219 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.9/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

55.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

61.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.