journal of advanced veterinary research | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2014 / 33,953
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 4 days ago

journal of advanced veterinary research

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of advanced veterinary research
Abbreviated Name journal of advanced veterinary research
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (15 total)

2013
An Abattoir-Based Study on Serodiagnosis of Swine Brucellosis in Makurdi, Benue State, North-Central Nigeria
Ngbede, Emmanuel Ochefije;Momoh, Asabe Halimat;Bala, Ruben Sylvester;Madaki, Blessed Dauda;Maurice, Nanven Abraham;
Vol. 3 , No. 2 , pp. 57-59
366 views Abstract
1995
response of two sunflower (helianthus annuus l.) genotypes to va-mycorrhizal inoculation and phosphorus levels
;C.P. CHANDRASHEKARA, V.C. PATIL;M.N. SREENIVASA
Vol. 8 , pp. 53-59
291 views Abstract
2009
development of antibody to ralstonia solanacearum and its application for detection of bacterial wilt
;YADI SURYADI
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 79-87
282 views Abstract
1991
potential role of wild crucifers in the preservation of diadegma eucerophaga horstman (hymenoptera: ichneumonidae), a parasitoid of the diamondback moth, plutella xylostella linnaeus (lepidoptera: plutellidae)
;UTOMO KARTOSUWONDO;SUNJAYA
Vol. 4 , pp. 31-40
277 views Abstract
2003
heterologous expression of a chitinase gene from aeromonas caviaein pseudomonas fluorescens
;ANTONIUS SUWANTO;AMARILA MAHK;BUDI TJAHJONO;BUDI TJAHJONO
Vol. 20 , pp. 36-48
264 views Abstract
2003
synergistic activity of enzymes produced by eupenicillium javanicum and aspergillus niger nrrl 337 on palm oil factory wastes
;TRESNAWATI PURWADARIA;YANTYATI WIDYASTUTI;Pius P. KETAREN;DYAH ISWANTINI PRADONO;NONI NIRWANA
Vol. 20 , pp. 1-10
262 views Abstract
1989
removal and leaching of nutrients by salvin1a molesta mitchel and eichhornia crassipes (mart.) solms
;Y.C. WEE and H.H. YEOH
Vol. 2 , pp. 25-31
254 views Abstract
2006
current microbiological aspects in high mountain
;KURT HANSELMANN;MUNTI YUHANA
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 56-67
251 views Abstract
1994
biological control of damping-off fungi of agoho (casuarina equisetifolia l.) using antagonistic bacteria
;F.A. DELA PEÑA;L.U. DELA CRUZ
Vol. 7 , pp. 1-11
232 views Abstract
2009
discrimination of two species of orangutans (pongo sp.): a rapid protocol for rehabilitation centres and zoos
;DYAH PERWITASARI-FARAJALLAH
Vol. 16 , No. 2 , pp. 65-70
230 views Abstract
View All 15 Articles
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.