Indexed in Journament · Verified Owner

Journal of Clinical Advances and Research Reviews

ISSN 3048-6556· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.2 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #7,980 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
34 Articles
Scores higher than 72.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Journal of Clinical Advances and Research Reviews (ISSN 3048-6556) is a leading peer-reviewed, open access journal dedicated to advancing clinical and pre-clinical research. Our publication accepts various article types, including Research Papers, Reviews, Editorials, Communications, among others. Our primary objective is to foster the dissemination of experimental and theoretical findings with comprehensive details to facilitate reproducibility. In addition to our standard features, our journal uniquely welcomes studies presenting meaningful negative results. While many journals in the clinical field focus on positive outcomes, we recognize the importance of negative data. By embracing such findings, we encourage researchers to share their results, preventing redundant experimentation and ensuring that valuable data are not overlooked. Through this approach, we aim to promote a more comprehensive understanding of clinical research outcomes.
Short Name J Cli Adv Res Rev
Abbreviated Name JCARR
ISSN 3048-6556
URL https://jcarr.in/index.php/files
Author Instructions https://jcarr.in/index.php/files/author

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Accessibility 45.0
Timeliness 80.0
Innovation 57.0
Community Impact 1.4
Content Distribution 25.2
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of Clinical Advances and Research Reviews
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 45.0 17.9
Timeliness 80.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 57.0 31.2
Community Impact 1.4 13.4
Content Distribution 25.2 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (34)

2025
A Review on Wound Healing Activity of Daucus Carrota and General Method of Herbal Topical Formulation
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 16-22
47 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Interflow of Traditional Drug & Innovations as fundamental Drug Design
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 23-27
34 views DOI Abstract
2025
Green Chemistry New Approach in Organic Synthesis: A Sustainable Approach
Vol. 2 , No. 4 , pp. 01-06
28 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Impact of Climate Change on Infectious Diseases in Urban Areas: A Comprehensive Review
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 40-54
28 views DOI Abstract
2025
Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate in Hyperkalemia-Induced Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Analysis
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 72-74
28 views DOI Abstract
2025
Knowledge and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students and Healthcare Professionals
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 68-71
27 views DOI Abstract
2025
Harnessing AI for the Future of Pharma Manufacturing
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 28-39
24 views DOI Abstract
2025
Evidence-Based Management of Recurrent UTIs: From Diagnosis to Prevention
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 75-86
24 views DOI Abstract
2025
Evidence-Based Management of Recurrent UTIs: From Diagnosis to Prevention
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 75-86
24 views DOI Abstract
2025
Efficacy of Sodium Bicarbonate in Hyperkalemia-Induced Cardiac Arrest: A Retrospective Analysis
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 72-74
28 views DOI Abstract
2025
Knowledge and Practice of Artificial Intelligence Among Medical Students and Healthcare Professionals
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 68-71
27 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Impact of Climate Change on Infectious Diseases in Urban Areas: A Comprehensive Review
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 40-54
28 views DOI Abstract
2025
Harnessing AI for the Future of Pharma Manufacturing
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 28-39
24 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Interflow of Traditional Drug & Innovations as fundamental Drug Design
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 23-27
34 views DOI Abstract
2025
A Review on Wound Healing Activity of Daucus Carrota and General Method of Herbal Topical Formulation
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 16-22
47 views DOI Abstract
2025
Total Knee Arthroplasty in a Stiff Knee Post Infection - A Case Report
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-15
5 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.2/100 · Below Average
Ranked #7,980 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

40.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

57.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

25.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.