journal of stress physiology & biochemistry | Journament

Journal Ranking

#3930 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
33
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

journal of stress physiology & biochemistry

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name journal of stress physiology & biochemistry
Abbreviated Name journal of stress physiology & biochemistry
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (7 total)

2017
high biologically effective dose radiation therapy using brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for high-risk prostate cancer
;Keisei Okamoto;Akinori Wada;Naoaki Kohno
Vol. 9 , No. 1 , pp. 1-6
474 views DOI Abstract
2017
computed tomography-guided implantation of 125 i seeds brachytherapy for recurrent multiple pulmonary oligometastases: initial experience and results
;Jie Li;Lijuan Zhang;Wenhuan Xu;Teng Wang;Leyuan Zhou;Qigen Xie;Weiguo Wang;Yanyan Hua
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 132-138
306 views DOI Abstract
2016
electronic brachytherapy for superficial and nodular basal cell carcinoma: a report of two prospective pilot trials using different doses
;Rosa Ballester-Sánchez;Olga Pons-Llanas;Cristian Candela-Juan;Francisco Javier Celada-Álvarez;Christopher A. Barker;Alejandro Tormo-Micó;Jose Pérez-Calatayud;Rafael Botella-Estrada
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 48-55
300 views DOI Abstract
2014
Behavioural Responses of Heterobranchus longifilis Juveniles. Val (Pisces: 1840) Exposed to Freeze–dried Bark Extract of Tephrosia vogelii as an Anaesthetic
Solomon, S.G.;Cheikyula, J.O.;Anju, D.T.;
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 82-92
291 views Abstract
2017
throwing the dart blind-folded: comparison of computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer with regard to dose received by the ‘actual’ targets and organs at risk
;Winnie Wing Ling Yip;Joyce Siu Yu Wong;Venus Wan Yan Lee;Frank Chi Sing Wong;Stewart Yuk Tung
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 446-452
219 views DOI Abstract
2011
dosimetric evaluation of internal shielding in a high dose rate skin applicator
;Françoise Lliso;Domingo Granero;Jose Perez-Calatayud;Vicente Carmona;M Carmen Pujades;Facundo Ballester
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 32-35
188 views Abstract
2017
calendar of events and meetings 2018-2021
;
Vol. 9 , No. 6 , pp. 590-590
174 views DOI
39
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
33
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

32.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.