Indexed in Journament

Journal of Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Surgery

ISSN 3062-3545· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #232 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
19 Articles
Scores higher than 99.2% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Journal of Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Surgery (JMOS) is peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of multidisciplinary clinical and basic research studies with collaboration between clinicians and scientists from different disciplines. The Journal aims to publish scientific studies focused on the latest developments in the field, especially in the field of Orthopedics and Traumatology, as well as other branches of science related to musculoskeletal problems.
Short Name JMOS
Abbreviated Name J Multidiscip Orthop Surg
ISSN 3062-3545
URL https://www.jomdos.org
Author Instructions https://www.jomdos.org/index.php/jomdos/about/submissions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 29.0
Community Impact 14.3
Content Distribution 94.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 70.0 19.2
Diversity — 28.8
Innovation 29.0 31.2
Community Impact 14.3 13.4
Content Distribution 94.9 88.4
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (19)

2025
Demographic and clinical profiles of elementary versus associated acetabular fractures: insights from a single-center study
Ahmet Yesevi Sarıaslan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 27-32
63 views DOI Abstract
2025
Catastrophic complication after total knee arthroplasty
Hüseyin Taşkoparan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 38-42
62 views DOI Abstract
2025
Bent intramedullary femoral nail: a rare injury following high-energy trauma
Abdurrahman Buğrahan Kişioğlu, Mustafa İştahlı, Zafer Karagöz
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 43-47
60 views DOI Abstract
2025
Search trends of orthopedic terms in Turkey: a five-year time series analysis based on Google Trends
Anıl Özgür
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 22-26
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
A rare disease to be considered in forefoot pain: Morton’s neuroma
Ali Pakırdaşı
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 18-21
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
Surgical treatment of trigger finger in adults
Hüseyin Yetkin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 11-14
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term clinical outcomes of posterior spinal instrumentation surgery in thoracolumbar and lumbar curvatures of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients
Emre Bal
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 6-10
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
Necessity of osteosynthesis in elderly patients with osteoporotic proximal femur fractures
Hasan Safa Doğan, Fettah Deniz, Serhat Bozkurt
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 48-50
53 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term results of the posteromedial release in the treatment of relapse clubfoot
Fırat Ozan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 33-37
53 views DOI Abstract
2025
Closed subtalar dislocation: Long-term results
Kemal Somdaş
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 15-17
50 views DOI Abstract
2025
Necessity of osteosynthesis in elderly patients with osteoporotic proximal femur fractures
Hasan Safa Doğan, Fettah Deniz, Serhat Bozkurt
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 48-50
53 views DOI Abstract
2025
Bent intramedullary femoral nail: a rare injury following high-energy trauma
Abdurrahman Buğrahan Kişioğlu, Mustafa İştahlı, Zafer Karagöz
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 43-47
60 views DOI Abstract
2025
Catastrophic complication after total knee arthroplasty
Hüseyin Taşkoparan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 38-42
62 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term results of the posteromedial release in the treatment of relapse clubfoot
Fırat Ozan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 33-37
53 views DOI Abstract
2025
Demographic and clinical profiles of elementary versus associated acetabular fractures: insights from a single-center study
Ahmet Yesevi Sarıaslan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 27-32
63 views DOI Abstract
2025
Search trends of orthopedic terms in Turkey: a five-year time series analysis based on Google Trends
Anıl Özgür
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 22-26
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
A rare disease to be considered in forefoot pain: Morton’s neuroma
Ali Pakırdaşı
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 18-21
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
Closed subtalar dislocation: Long-term results
Kemal Somdaş
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 15-17
50 views DOI Abstract
2025
Surgical treatment of trigger finger in adults
Hüseyin Yetkin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 11-14
56 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term clinical outcomes of posterior spinal instrumentation surgery in thoracolumbar and lumbar curvatures of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients
Emre Bal
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 6-10
56 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #232 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

45.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

29.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

14.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

94.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.