Indexed in Journament

Journal of Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Surgery

ISSN 3062-3545· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
47.8 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #341 of 29,298 scored journals (34,028 indexed)
33 Articles
Scores higher than 98.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
AI Quality Analysis
38.6 / 100
Separate paid analysis — does not affect the Journament Score or ranking.

About This Journal

JOMDOS is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal devoted to multidisciplinary clinical and basic research on the musculoskeletal system. The journal serves as a common platform for surgeons, physicians, and scientists from different disciplines whose work — directly or indirectly — concerns musculoskeletal health, disease, and trauma. The journal actively welcomes and encourages submissions from all surgical and medical branches related to the musculoskeletal system, including but not limited to: Surgical Disciplines: Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hand Surgery and Microsurgery, Neurosurgery and Spine Surgery, General Surgery, Pediatric Surgery. Medical Disciplines: Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rheumatology, Sports Medicine, Geriatrics, Emergency Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Infectious Diseases. Diagnostic and Basic Sciences: Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, Pathology, Anatomy, Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences. The Journal of Multidisciplinary Orthopaedic Surgery covers the following types of studies: Original research articles Biomechanical studies Experimental studies Review articles Case reports Surgical techniques Brief reports Clinical images Educational articles Letters to the editor JOMDOS considers for publication any methodologically rigorous contribution that advances the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, or rehabilitation of musculoskeletal disorders. Studies that integrate the perspectives, methodologies, or expertise of multiple disciplines are particularly encouraged. Submissions are judged on scientific quality and adherence to ethical standards. JOMDOS is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It is a peer-reviewed journal that provides open access to scientific studies. Published issues and the full texts of the articles can be accessed free of charge. The journal does not charge any Article Processing Charges (APCs) or submission fees for the publication of articles. At JOMDOS, we believe every aspect of your research holds inherent value, and we provide an accessible platform to showcase your work within the scientific literature.
Short Name JOMDOS
Abbreviated Name J Multidiscip Orthop Surg
ISSN 3062-3545
URL https://jomdos.org
Author Instructions https://jomdos.org/jomdos/about/submissions

Quality Profile

11 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

1 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 35.0 30.5
Accessibility 30.0 23.1
Timeliness 90.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 26.4 6.1
Content Distribution 37.5 89.5
Content Quality 44.0 55.1
Ethics & Transparency 48.0 40.5
Editorial Standards 25.0 33.0
Publication Regularity 45.0 52.9
Geographic Reach 22.0 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (33)

2025
Demographic and clinical profiles of elementary versus associated acetabular fractures: insights from a single-center study
Ahmet Yesevi Sarıaslan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 27-32
113 views DOI Abstract
2025
Search trends of orthopedic terms in Turkey: a five-year time series analysis based on Google Trends
Anıl Özgür
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 22-26
101 views DOI Abstract
2025
Catastrophic complication after total knee arthroplasty
Hüseyin Taşkoparan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 38-42
95 views DOI Abstract
2025
Bent intramedullary femoral nail: a rare injury following high-energy trauma
Abdurrahman Buğrahan Kişioğlu, Mustafa İştahlı, Zafer Karagöz
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 43-47
93 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term clinical outcomes of posterior spinal instrumentation surgery in thoracolumbar and lumbar curvatures of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients
Emre Bal
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 6-10
89 views DOI Abstract
2025
A rare disease to be considered in forefoot pain: Morton’s neuroma
Ali Pakırdaşı
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 18-21
88 views DOI Abstract
2025
Surgical treatment of trigger finger in adults
Hüseyin Yetkin
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 11-14
88 views DOI Abstract
2025
Mid-term results of the posteromedial release in the treatment of relapse clubfoot
Fırat Ozan
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 33-37
87 views DOI Abstract
2025
Closed subtalar dislocation: Long-term results
Kemal Somdaş
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 15-17
85 views DOI Abstract
2025
Necessity of osteosynthesis in elderly patients with osteoporotic proximal femur fractures
Hasan Safa Doğan, Fettah Deniz, Serhat Bozkurt
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 48-50
84 views DOI Abstract
2026
A neglected Bosworth fracture-dislocation complicated by diabetic neuropathy: a case report
Hasan Safa Doğan
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 20-22
28 views DOI Abstract
2026
Parrot's pseudoparalysis: a case of congenital syphilis
Beyzanur Avcı Yalçın
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 23-25
29 views DOI Abstract
2026
Isolated lesser trochanter avulsion fracture in an adolescent footballer: successful conservative management
Buğra Can, Şükrü Demir
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 13-16
28 views DOI Abstract
2026
Giant Baker's cyst associated with pigmented villonodular synovitis: surgical management of a rare case
Erdoğan Suna
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 17-19
31 views DOI Abstract
2026
Evaluation and management of clavicle fractures in the juvenile population: a retrospective analysis of 456 patients
Mustafa İştahlı
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 8-12
28 views DOI Abstract
2026
From heel to hip: medial buttressing for quadrilateral plate fractures of the acetabulum with a locking calcaneal plate
Kemal Somdaş, Süleyman Yalçın, Fırat Ozan
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-7
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
Periacetabular bone metastasis in follicular variant papillary thyroid carcinoma: a case report
Salih Ahmet Aksu, Ahmet Yesevi Sarıaslan, Ömer Tolga Şekerci, İbrahim Altun, Sabri Batın
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 48-52
30 views DOI Abstract
2026
Penetrating axillary trauma resulting from garden fence impalement
Kemal Somdaş
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 53-54
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mechanical insufficiency fractures of modular femoral stems in hip arthroplasty: a case series of three patients
Tarık Özdin, Ali Eray Günay, Atilla Koçer
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 43-47
27 views DOI Abstract
2026
Public interest in platelet-rich plasma and stem cell therapies for hip and knee osteoarthritis in Türkiye: a Google Trends analysis
Batuhan Ayhan, Samet Batuhan Yoğurt
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 26-31
31 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
47.8/100 · Below Average
Ranked #341 of 29,298 scored
(34,028 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis 38.6/100
Journament

Overall Quality Score

47.8/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

35.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 2 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

26.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

37.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

48.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

44.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

25.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

45.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

22.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 2 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.