Tropical animal health and production | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1981 / 33,959
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.2/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

Tropical animal health and production

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi ulakbim
Short Name Trop Anim Health Prod
Abbreviated Name tropical animal health and production
ISSN 0049-4747
Aim and Scope
URL https://link.springer.com/journal/11250
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (32 total)

2017
Characterisation of adopters and non-adopters of dairy technologies in Ethiopia and Kenya.
Kebebe, E G;Oosting, S J;Baltenweck, I;Duncan, A J;
Vol. 49 , No. 4 , pp. 681-690
552 views DOI Abstract
2014
Risk factors for bovine mastitis in the Central Province of Sri Lanka.
Gunawardana, Suraj;Thilakarathne, Dulari;Abegunawardana, Indra S;Abeynayake, Preeni;Robertson, Colin;Stephen, Craig;
Vol. 46 , No. 7 , pp. 1105-12
438 views DOI Abstract
2019
Novel single nucleotide polymorphisms in the heat shock protein 70.1 gene in South African Nguni crossbred cattle.
Mkize, Lwamkelekile Sitshilelo;Zishiri, Oliver Tendayi;
, pp. 0-0
430 views DOI Abstract
2018
Piloting the effectiveness of pig health education in combination with oxfendazole treatment on prevention and/or control of porcine cysticercosis, gastrointestinal parasites, African swine fever and ectoparasites in Angónia District, Mozambique.
Chilundo, A G;Johansen, M V;Pondja, A;Miambo, R;Afonso, S;Mukaratirwa, S;
Vol. 50 , No. 3 , pp. 589-601
397 views DOI Abstract
2020
Seroprevalence and risk factors assessment of the three main infectious agents associated with abortion in dairy cattle in Isfahan province, Iran.
Noaman, Vahid;Nabinejad, Abdol Reza;
394 views DOI Abstract
2018
Phenotypic characterization of beef cattle breeds and production practices in Liberia.
Karnuah, Arthur Bob;Dunga, Gregory;Wennah, Arthur;Wiles, Walter T;Greaves, Edmond;Varkpeh, Roland;Osei-Amponsah, Richard;Boettcher, Paul;
Vol. 50 , No. 6 , pp. 1287-1294
381 views DOI Abstract
2016
Characterising and comparing animal-health services in the Rift Valley, Kenya: an exploratory analysis (part I).
Higham, L E;Ongeri, W;Asena, K;Thrusfield, M V;
Vol. 48 , No. 8 , pp. 1621-1632
371 views Abstract
2019
Sanitary measures in piggeries, awareness, and risk factors of African swine fever in Benue State, Nigeria
Asambe, A.
Vol. 51 , pp. 997-1001
368 views DOI
2019
Chemical and color characterization of breast meat from FUNAAB indigenous and marshal broiler chickens.
Sokoya, O O;Babajide, J M;Shittu, T A;Sanwo, K A;Adegbite, J A;
363 views DOI Abstract
2019
Economic losses caused by the use of low-efficacy anthelmintic drugs in growing heifers.
Pivoto, Felipe Lamberti;Cezar, Alfredo Skrebsky;Vogel, Fernanda Silveira Flores;Marques, Camila Balconi;Alves, Marta Elena Machado;Becker, Camila Coelho;do Rego Leal, Marta Lizandra;
347 views DOI Abstract
View All 32 Articles
41
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.2/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.