Indexed in Journament

Lara D. Veeken

Oxford University Press· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
49.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #174 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
288 Articles
Scores higher than 99.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name Lara D. Veeken
Abbreviated Name Lara D. Veeken

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.0
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 7.1
Content Distribution 59.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Lara D. Veeken
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.0 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 7.1 5.0
Content Distribution 59.5 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (288)

2013
The prevalence of depression in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
84 views DOI Abstract
2026
Early belimumab accelerates renal response and reduces glucocorticoid exposure in lupus nephritis: a multicenter propensity-matched study
50 views DOI Abstract
2026
Anti-Ro52 antibodies in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: clinical significance across myositis-specific antibody-defined subgroups
44 views DOI Abstract
1997
Measuring health-related quality of life in rheumatoid arthritis: validity, responsiveness and reliability of EuroQol (EQ-5D)
41 views DOI Abstract
2003
A simplified disease activity index for rheumatoid arthritis for use in clinical practice
40 views DOI Abstract
2010
Transmembrane TNF- : structure, function and interaction with anti-TNF agents
37 views DOI Abstract
2026
Plasma metabolomics and incident major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with rheumatoid arthritis
35 views DOI Abstract
1989
WORKING FOR PATIENTS?
35 views DOI
2010
Neutrophil function in inflammation and inflammatory diseases
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
Variable cutaneous manifestations during the course of trisomy 8-associated Behçet-like syndrome
1 views DOI
2026
Identifying biomarkers for methotrexate efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis: a machine learning approach to whole-blood transcriptomic analysis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Second pregnancy outcomes in SLE
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Efficacy and safety of probiotic supplementation in psoriatic arthritis - a randomized controlled trial
23 views DOI Abstract
2026
Ultrasound in psoriatic arthritis: from detecting abnormalities to defining clinical relevance
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Impacts of socioeconomic status on ambulatory care sensitive condition hospitalizations in rheumatoid arthritis
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Is checkpoint inhibitors-induced polymyalgia rheumatica really polymyalgia rheumatica?
1 views DOI
2026
Performance of lupus classification criteria in monogenic lupus: a national multicenter cohort study
1 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
49.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #174 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

49.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

59.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.