Int J Human Soc Sci Bus Man | Journament

Journal Ranking

#127 / 33,718
📉 Poor
Overall Score
15.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
2
Accessibility
50
Timeliness
90
Diversity
30
Innovation
35
Community Impact
10
Ethics & Transparency
5
Content Quality
40
Editorial Diversity
30
Publication Regularity
70
Geographic Reach
20
Updated 1 month ago

Int J Human Soc Sci Bus Man

Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name The International Journal of Humanities, Social Sciences and Business Management
Abbreviated Name IJHSBM
ISSN 3049-3803
Aim and Scope Auto-created from article submission. Awaiting editorial review.
URL https://ijhsbm.com
Author Instructions https://ijhsbm.com/index.php/files/policies_and_guidelines

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (5 total)

2025
The Role of Teachers in 21st-Century Education: A Pedagogical Review
, pp. 16-20
4 views DOI Abstract
2025
Democracy in the Digital Age: Opportunities and Challenges
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
1 views DOI Abstract
2025
Digital Marketing Trends and Consumer Engagement: A Review
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 6-10
Abstract
2025
Income Inequality and Economic Growth: A Critical Review
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 11-15
Abstract
15
Overall
Poor
2
50
30
35
10
90
5
40
30
70
20

Overall Quality Score

15.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

2.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

50.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 5 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

35.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

90.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

5.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

40.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

30.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

70.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

20.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 5 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.