Indexed in Journament

Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology

ISSN 0022-3050· Oxford University Press· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,956 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
40 Articles
Scores higher than 35.3% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

The Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (JNEN) publishes peer-reviewed articles in all areas of neuropathology and experimental neuroscience. This includes original research reports, invited reviews, and timely mini-reviews on topics of current interest. JNEN emphasizes basic research relevant to diseases of the nervous system. Clinical studies will be considered if they provide novel insights into disease mechanisms.
Short Name Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Abbreviated Name Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
ISSN 0022-3050
URL https://academic.oup.com/jnen
Author Instructions https://academic.oup.com/jnen/pages/General_Instructions

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.5
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 70.0
Innovation 26.0
Community Impact 0.7
Content Distribution 32.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.5 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 70.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 26.0 31.2
Community Impact 0.7 13.4
Content Distribution 32.7 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (40)

2005
Extensive Involvement of Autophagy in Alzheimer Disease: An Immuno-Electron Microscopy Study
32 views DOI Abstract
2007
Expression of Nrf2 in Neurodegenerative Diseases
30 views DOI Abstract
2011
Stages of the Pathologic Process in Alzheimer Disease: Age Categories From 1 to 100 Years
29 views DOI Abstract
2003
Subpial Demyelination in the Cerebral Cortex of Multiple Sclerosis Patients
29 views DOI Abstract
2009
Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy in Athletes: Progressive Tauopathy After Repetitive Head Injury
25 views DOI Abstract
2002
Broad Expression of Toll-Like Receptors in the Human Central Nervous System
23 views DOI Abstract
2012
Correlation of Alzheimer Disease Neuropathologic Changes With Cognitive Status: A Review of the Literature
20 views DOI Abstract
2012
Accuracy of the Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer Disease at National Institute on Aging Alzheimer Disease Centers, 2005–2010
19 views DOI Abstract
2026
Mechanisms contributing to the age at onset of temporal lobe epilepsy due to hippocampal sclerosis
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Large amyloid plaques associate with early behavioral alterations in 6-month-old APPswe/PS1dE9 mice
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
A rare MYBL1-altered pediatric-type diffuse astrocytoma with positive OLIG2 and MAP2 expression and high proliferative activity
7 views DOI
2026
Clinicopathologic characterization of a non-expansile, epilepsy-associated neocortical lesion with BRAF K601E mutation
7 views DOI
2026
Spinal high-grade astrocytoma with piloid features presenting with progressive encephalopathy, hypoglycorrhachia, hydrocephalus, and leptomeningeal dissemination
9 views DOI
2026
In This Issue
10 views DOI
2026
Histopathological and molecular heterogeneity of dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Cortical subpial aging-related tau astrogliopathy in older adult men who participated in youth amateur American-style football
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Atorvastatin and ischemic stroke: Mechanisms and therapeutic applications
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,956 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

26.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

70.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

32.7/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.