Indexed in Journament

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Oxford University Press· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #14,135 of 23,453 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
96 Articles
Scores higher than 39.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Abbreviated Name European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 1.4
Content Distribution 16.9
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.0
Accessibility 19.5
Timeliness 100.0 33.8
Diversity 30.1
Innovation 36.0
Community Impact 1.4 22.8
Content Distribution 16.9 86.4
Content Quality 54.2
Ethics & Transparency 39.5
Editorial Standards 32.5
Publication Regularity 51.6
Geographic Reach 30.0

Publications Per Year

Articles (96)

2018
Standardization of left atrial, right ventricular, and right atrial deformation imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography: a consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging
80 views DOI Abstract
2015
Recommendations for Cardiac Chamber Quantification by Echocardiography in Adults: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
42 views DOI Abstract
2016
Recommendations for the Evaluation of Left Ventricular Diastolic Function by Echocardiography: An Update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
38 views DOI Abstract
2014
Definitions for a common standard for 2D speckle tracking echocardiography: consensus document of the EACVI/ASE/Industry Task Force to standardize deformation imaging
35 views DOI Abstract
2013
Recommendations for the echocardiographic assessment of native valvular regurgitation: an executive summary from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
34 views DOI Abstract
2014
Expert consensus for multimodality imaging evaluation of adult patients during and after cancer therapy: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging
11 views DOI Abstract
2026
A Single View Is Not Enough: Biplane Vena Contracta Width in AFMR
5 views DOI
2026
Long-term Prognostic Value of Stress Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Patients with Hypertension without known coronary artery disease
4 views DOI Abstract
2026
Incidentally detected isolated right ventricular apical hypoplasia in an adult
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Detection and quantification of left-to-right shunts by magnetic resonance contrast bolus time intensity curves
DOI
2026
Sex-related differences in outcome of tricuspid valve surgery in severe isolated secondary tricuspid regurgitation
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Prognostic Value of Pericoronary Adipose Tissue on ECG-Gated Non-Contrast CT in Patients With Stable Chest Pain: Insights from the PROMISE Trial
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Zero Iodine and full clarity: Gadolinium-enhanced Spectral CT unmasks late aortic graft dehiscence
1 views DOI
2026
Usefulness of oesophageal irrigation during transoesophageal echocardiographic guidance for structural heart interventions
DOI
2026
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance reveals stable myocardial tissue characteristics despite cardiac remodelling after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt in liver cirrhosis
DOI Abstract
Journament Score
37.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #14,135 of 23,453 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

37.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

1.4/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

16.9/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.