Indexed in Journament

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Oxford University Press· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
40.7 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #1,245 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
357 Articles
Scores higher than 95.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Abbreviated Name JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 27.5
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.4
Accessibility — 22.6
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.0
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.1
Content Distribution 27.5 88.8
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (357)

2014
Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Arnoud J. Templeton, Mairéad G. McNamara, Boštjan Šeruga, Francisco Vera-Badillo, Priya Aneja, Alberto Ocaña, Raya Leibowitz‐Amit, Guru Sonpavde, Jennifer J. Knox, Ben Tran, Ian F. Tannock, Eitan Amir
53 views DOI Abstract
2007
Expression of p95HER2, a Truncated Form of the HER2 Receptor, and Response to Anti-HER2 Therapies in Breast Cancer
Maurizio Scaltriti, Federico Rojo, Alberto Ocaña, Judit Anido, Marta Guzmán, Javier Cortés, Serena Di Cosimo, Xavier Matías‐Guiu, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Joaquı́n Arribas, José Baselga
44 views DOI Abstract
1989
Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined Annually
M. H. Gail, Louise A. Brinton, David P. Byar, Donald K. Corle, S. B. Green, C. Schairer, John J. Mulvihill
42 views DOI Abstract
1996
Risk Factors for Lung Cancer and for Intervention Effects in CARET, the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial
Gilbert S. Omenn, Gary E. Goodman, Mark Thornquist, John R. Balmes, Mark R. Cullen, Andrew Glass, James P. Keogh, Frank L. Meyskens, Barbara Valanis, J. H. Williams, Scott Barnhart, Martin G. Cherniack, Carl A. Brodkin, Samuel P. Hammar
40 views DOI Abstract
2004
Mechanisms of Tamoxifen Resistance: Increased Estrogen Receptor-HER2/neu Cross-Talk in ER/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Jianzhong Shou, Suleiman Massarweh, C. K. Osborne, A. E. Wakeling, Simak Ali, Helen A. Weiss, Rachel Schiff
39 views DOI Abstract
2017
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, Featuring Survival
Ahmedin Jemal, Elizabeth Ward, Christopher J. Johnson, Kathleen A. Cronin, Jiemin Ma, A. Blythe Ryerson, Angela B. Mariotto, Andrew Lake, Reda Wilson, Recinda Sherman, Robert N. Anderson, S. Jane Henley, Betsy Kohler, Lynne Penberthy, Eric J. Feuer, Hannah K. Weir
38 views DOI Abstract
2017
Novel Role of FBXW7 Circular RNA in Repressing Glioma Tumorigenesis
Yibing Yang, Xinya Gao, Maolei Zhang, Sheng Yan, Chengjun Sun, Feizhe Xiao, Nunu Huang, Xuesong Yang, Kun Zhao, Huangkai Zhou, Suyun Huang, Bo Xie, Nu Zhang
38 views DOI Abstract
2000
Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers
Margaret T. Mandelson
37 views DOI Abstract
2015
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State
Betsy Kohler, Recinda Sherman, Nadia Howlader, Ahmedin Jemal, A. Blythe Ryerson, Kevin Henry, Francis P. Boscoe, Kathleen A. Cronin, Andrew Lake, Anne‐Michelle Noone, S. Jane Henley, Christie R. Eheman, Robert N. Anderson, Lynne Penberthy
34 views DOI Abstract
2014
Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Ethan Basch, Bryce B. Reeve, Sandra A. Mitchell, Steven B. Clauser, Lori M. Minasian, Amylou C. Dueck, Tito R. Mendoza, Jennifer L. Hay, Thomas M. Atkinson, Amy P. Abernethy, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Charles S. Cleeland, Jeff A Sloan, Ram Chilukuri, Paul Baumgartner, Andrea Denicoff, Diane St Germain, Ann M. O’Mara, Alice Chen, Joseph Kelaghan, Antonia V. Bennett, Laura Sit, Lauren J. Rogak, Allison Barz Leahy, Diane Β. Paul, Deborah Schrag
32 views DOI Abstract
2026
Effectiveness of an eHealth intervention to improve quality of life in long-term breast cancer survivors: a 9-month randomized controlled trial
Gustavo Adolfo Pimentel-Parra, Paula Escalada-Hernández, Leticia San Martín‐Rodríguez, Cristina Garcia-Vivar, Nelia Soto-Ruiz
DOI Abstract
2026
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances levels other than PFOS, PFOA, or PFHxS and liver cancer risk: a nested case-control analysis
Cody Z. Watling, Jessica L. Petrick, Barry I. Graubard, Hyokyoung G. Hong, Xuehong Zhang, Matthew J Barnett, Mollie E. Barnard, Yu Chen, A Heather Eliassen, J Michael Gaziano, Wen‐Yi Huang, Jae H Kang, Jill Koshiol, I-Min Lee, Erikka Loftfield, Steven C Moore, Lorelei A Mucci, Marian L Neuhouser, Christina C. Newton, Howard D Sesso, Martha Shrubsole, Rashmi Sinha, Lesley Tinker, Triplette Matthew, Caroline Y. Um, Kala Visvanathan, Jean Wactawski‐Wende, Eleanor L. Watts, Walter C Willett, Fen Wu, Wei Zheng, Peter T. Campbell, Jonathan N Hofmann, Mark P. Purdue, DINESH BARUPAL, Katherine A. McGlynn
DOI Abstract
2026
Expansion of the world health organization (WHO) gastric neuroendocrine tumor classification: introducing types 4 and 5
Jonathan Strosberg, Deyali Chatterjee, Gregory Y. Lauwers, Mintallah Haider, Thorvardur R Halfdanarson
3 views DOI Abstract
2026
PRO‑CTCAE in Oncology Drug Evaluation: Cross-Agency Review of Regulatory and Health Technology Assessment Decision-Making in the United States and Europe
Ethan Basch, Matthew Reaney, Jessica Roydhouse, Bellinda L. King‐Kallimanis, Daneen Sekoni, Joanne Buzaglo, Montserrat Casamayor, Robert Caruano, Chieh-I Chen, Ruben G W Quek, Vera Mastey, James Harnett, Lei Chi
1 views DOI Abstract
2026
Ancestry-Dependent Immunologic and Prognostic Effects Characterize the Prostate Cancer Urinary Proteome
Annie Ha, Jaron Arbet, Zhuyu Qiu, Amanda Khoo, Brian P. Main, Meinusha Govindarajan, Matthew Waas, Stanley K. Liu, O John Semmes, Julius O. Nyalwidhe, Paul C. Boutros, Thomas Kislinger
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
RE: Benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or Gemcitabine-Nab-paclitaxel: a multinational analysis
Jiayong Ning, Zhijian Ren, Peng Yao
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
SHBG as a breast cancer risk biomarker in premenopausal women? Results from an individual patient's pooled analysis and a meta-analysis
Davide Serrano, Roberta Rizzo, Harriet Johansson, Debora Macis, Valentina Aristarco, Aliana Guerrieri‐Gonzaga, Matteo Lazzeroni, Gaetano Aurilio, Alessio Carbone, Sofia Ramalho, Bernardo Bonanni, Andrea DeCensi, Sara Gandini
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
Opioid limiting law and opioid prescriptions among Medicaid-enrolled survivors of childhood cancer
Xin Hu, James L. Klosky, Deo Kumar Srivastava, Zhanji Zhang, Tara M. Brinkman, Kevin Krull, Paul C Nathan, Claire Snyder, Gregory T Armstrong, Vikki Nolan, Yutaka Yasui, Sharon M Castellino, Xu Ji
2 views DOI Abstract
2026
(Neo)adjuvant approvals for solid tumors by the US Food and Drug Administration 2010-2023
Consolacion Molto Valiente, Abhenil Mittal, Dongsheng Tu, Eitan Amir, Joseph Pater, Janet Dancey, Bishal Gyawali, Christopher M Booth, Brooke E. Wilson
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Treatment Effect Discrepancy Between PFS and OS in Antibody-Drug Conjugate Trials for Metastatic Breast Cancer: A Meta-Epidemiologic Analysis
Luiz Felipe Costa de Almeida, Anelise Poluboiarinov Cappellaro, Mariana Macambira Noronha, Lucas Diniz da Conceição, Lorrany Larisse Costa Rodrigues, Luís Felipe Leite, Rodolfo Garza-Morales, Brenda Ernst, Andreia Cristina de Melo, Jessé Lopes da Silva, Paolo Tarantino, Dario Trapani, Felipe Batalini
7 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
40.7/100 · Below Average
Ranked #1,245 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.