Indexed in Journament

JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Oxford University Press· EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
51.3 / 100
Journament Score
Average
Ranked #76 of 29,297 scored journals (34,017 indexed)
372 Articles
Scores higher than 99.7% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
Abbreviated Name JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.7
Timeliness 100.0
Community Impact 10.7
Content Distribution 62.6
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.7 30.5
Accessibility — 23.0
Timeliness 100.0 3.0
Diversity — 25.9
Innovation — 24.1
Community Impact 10.7 5.2
Content Distribution 62.6 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (372)

2014
Prognostic Role of Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Solid Tumors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Arnoud J. Templeton, Mairéad G. McNamara, Boštjan Šeruga, Francisco Vera-Badillo, Priya Aneja, Alberto Ocaña, Raya Leibowitz‐Amit, Guru Sonpavde, Jennifer J. Knox, Ben Tran, Ian F. Tannock, Eitan Amir
65 views DOI Abstract
2007
Expression of p95HER2, a Truncated Form of the HER2 Receptor, and Response to Anti-HER2 Therapies in Breast Cancer
Maurizio Scaltriti, Federico Rojo, Alberto Ocaña, Judit Anido, Marta Guzmán, Javier Cortés, Serena Di Cosimo, Xavier Matías‐Guiu, Santiago Ramón y Cajal, Joaquı́n Arribas, José Baselga
56 views DOI Abstract
2004
Mechanisms of Tamoxifen Resistance: Increased Estrogen Receptor-HER2/neu Cross-Talk in ER/HER2-Positive Breast Cancer
Jianzhong Shou, Suleiman Massarweh, C. K. Osborne, A. E. Wakeling, Simak Ali, Helen A. Weiss, Rachel Schiff
56 views DOI Abstract
1989
Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined Annually
M. H. Gail, Louise A. Brinton, David P. Byar, Donald K. Corle, S. B. Green, C. Schairer, John J. Mulvihill
56 views DOI Abstract
2017
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975–2014, Featuring Survival
Ahmedin Jemal, Elizabeth Ward, Christopher J. Johnson, Kathleen A. Cronin, Jiemin Ma, A. Blythe Ryerson, Angela B. Mariotto, Andrew Lake, Reda Wilson, Recinda Sherman, Robert N. Anderson, S. Jane Henley, Betsy Kohler, Lynne Penberthy, Eric J. Feuer, Hannah K. Weir
49 views DOI Abstract
2017
Novel Role of FBXW7 Circular RNA in Repressing Glioma Tumorigenesis
Yibing Yang, Xinya Gao, Maolei Zhang, Sheng Yan, Chengjun Sun, Feizhe Xiao, Nunu Huang, Xuesong Yang, Kun Zhao, Huangkai Zhou, Suyun Huang, Bo Xie, Nu Zhang
48 views DOI Abstract
2000
Breast Density as a Predictor of Mammographic Detection: Comparison of Interval- and Screen-Detected Cancers
Margaret T. Mandelson
48 views DOI Abstract
1996
Risk Factors for Lung Cancer and for Intervention Effects in CARET, the Beta-Carotene and Retinol Efficacy Trial
Gilbert S. Omenn, Gary E. Goodman, Mark Thornquist, John R. Balmes, Mark R. Cullen, Andrew Glass, James P. Keogh, Frank L. Meyskens, Barbara Valanis, J. H. Williams, Scott Barnhart, Martin G. Cherniack, Carl A. Brodkin, Samuel P. Hammar
48 views DOI Abstract
2014
Development of the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)
Ethan Basch, Bryce B. Reeve, Sandra A. Mitchell, Steven B. Clauser, Lori M. Minasian, Amylou C. Dueck, Tito R. Mendoza, Jennifer L. Hay, Thomas M. Atkinson, Amy P. Abernethy, Deborah Watkins Bruner, Charles S. Cleeland, Jeff A Sloan, Ram Chilukuri, Paul Baumgartner, Andrea Denicoff, Diane St Germain, Ann M. O’Mara, Alice Chen, Joseph Kelaghan, Antonia V. Bennett, Laura Sit, Lauren J. Rogak, Allison Barz Leahy, Diane Β. Paul, Deborah Schrag
45 views DOI Abstract
2015
Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2011, Featuring Incidence of Breast Cancer Subtypes by Race/Ethnicity, Poverty, and State
Betsy Kohler, Recinda Sherman, Nadia Howlader, Ahmedin Jemal, A. Blythe Ryerson, Kevin Henry, Francis P. Boscoe, Kathleen A. Cronin, Andrew Lake, Anne‐Michelle Noone, S. Jane Henley, Christie R. Eheman, Robert N. Anderson, Lynne Penberthy
44 views DOI Abstract
2026
A new microsimulation model of HPV natural history for comparison of novel cervical screening strategies
Nicole G Campos, Li C. Cheung, Fangya Mao, Brian Befano, Didem Egemen, Stephen Sy, Jane J Kim, Nicolas Wentzensen, Kanan Desai, Silvia de Sanjosé, Mark Schiffman
DOI Abstract
2026
Advancing opportunities for collaboration between national cancer Institute-Designated cancer centers and native nations: Building of an indigenous cancer health department
Rodney C. Haring, Josie Raphaelito, Hugh Burnam, Will Maybee, Whitney Ann E. Henry, Shannon MacCallum, David Mattson, Tricia A. Numan, James Kennedy, Michael E Johnson, Janos Janine Bowen, Rory Wheeler, Candace Johnson
DOI Abstract
2026
The early-onset pancreatic cancer paradox: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Rexiati Ruze, Musitapa Zayier, Aboduhaiwaier Aboduhelili, Talaiti Tuergan, Aboduaini Abulizi, Qiang Guo, Ruiqing Zhang, Paizula Shalayiadang, Ahan Ayifuhan, Tiemin Jiang, Yingmei Shao, Tuerganaili Aji
DOI Abstract
2026
A validated clinical calculator of a brain metastasis risk (BrMR) prediction model in stage I-III breast cancer patients
Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra, Nuria Kotecki, Kristofer Jennings, Ottavia Amato, Ahmad Hussein Awada, Nuhad K. Ibrahim
DOI Abstract
2026
Late effects after novel therapies for childhood cancer: Anticipating the future landscape of health outcomes for survivors
Amy M. Berkman, David T. Teachey, Matthew J. Ehrhardt, Ching‐Hon Pui, Hiroto Inaba, Seth E. Karol, Sharon M. Castellino, Stephanie B. Dixon, Jun J Yang, Thomas G. Gross, Sara Michele Federico, Roger J. Packer, Alberto S. Pappo, Ibrahim A. Qaddoumi, Ralph Salloum, Stephanie M Smith, Todd M. Cooper, Tara Olive Henderson, Douglas S. Hawkins, Paul Craig Nathan, Eric Jessen Chow, Elizabeth Fox, Gregory T. Armstrong
DOI Abstract
2026
Response to Parpia, Greenstreet, Whelan et al
Bishal Gyawali
DOI
2026
Projected impact of population-level multi-cancer early detection screening: a discrete event simulation analysis
Nitish Aswani, Jiheum Park, Francesca Lim, Matthew T. Prest, Jennifer S. Ferris, Jeong Yun Yang, Liyuan Gong, Stella K. Kang, Chin Hur
DOI Abstract
2026
21-Gene recurrence score assay in pN2-3 Early-Stage breast cancer: a national cancer database study
Carmine Valenza, Yue Zheng, José Pablo Leone, Dario Trapani, Pier Paolo Maria Berton Giachetti, Guilherme Nader Marta, Laura Stewart Dominici, Sara M. Tolaney, Ann H. Partridge, Giuseppe Curigliano, Meredith M. Regan, Harold J. Burstein
DOI Abstract
2026
Epstein-Barr virus-attributable cancers among children and adolescents in Europe and North America: a meta-analysis
Karena D. Volesky, Olga Tsyruk-Romano, Allan Hildesheim, Stephen D. Walter, Mariam El‐Zein, Christine M. Friedenreich, Darren R. Brenner, Eduardo Luis Franco
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
Immunotherapy-Based Therapies in Pediatric Hodgkin Lymphoma: Potential to Narrow the Gap in Long-Term Survival
Jenna R. Rogers, Zachary J. Ward, Angela Marie Feraco, Sharon M. Castellino, Kayla L. Stratton, Wendy M. Leisenring, Gregory T. Armstrong, Eric Jessen Chow, Rebecca M. Howell, Melissa M. Hudson, Kara M. Kelly, Lindsay McOmber Morton, Kevin Charles Oeffinger, Susan A. Smith, Lisa Diller, Jennifer M. Yeh
6 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
51.3/100 · Average
Ranked #76 of 29,297 scored
(34,017 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

51.3/100

Tier: Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.7/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

100.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

62.6/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.