Indexed in Journament

Journal of Religious, Literary and Cultural Studies

ISSN 3105-8051· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #18,903 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
36 Articles
Scores higher than 35.5% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →
AI Quality Analysis
51.2 / 100
Separate paid analysis — does not affect the Journament Score or ranking.

About This Journal

The Journal of Religious, Literature and Cultural Studies (JORLCS) is an open-access, peer-reviewed scholarly journal dedicated to exploring the dynamic intersections between religion, literature, and cultural studies. The journal provides an interdisciplinary platform for original research, critical reviews, and theoretical contributions that examine how religious beliefs, traditions, and ideologies shape—and are shaped by—literary expression and cultural contexts.
Short Name J Rel Lit Cul Stu
Abbreviated Name JORLCS
ISSN 3105-8051
URL https://jorlcs.com/index.php/Journal/index
Author Instructions https://jorlcs.com/index.php/Journal/index

Quality Profile

11 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

1 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Journal of Religious, Literary and Cultural Studies
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.3 30.1
Accessibility 45.0 17.9
Timeliness 60.0 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 10.5 31.2
Community Impact 20.7 13.4
Content Distribution 27.0 88.4
Content Quality 60.0 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 50.0 40.2
Editorial Standards 35.0 33.4
Publication Regularity 85.0 53.2
Geographic Reach 20.0 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (36)

2025
Phenomenology of the Transcendental Experience of Na¢t
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
144 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Emotional Palette: Exploring the Power of Color in Art and Human Perception
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 33-39
89 views Abstract
2025
Phenomenology of the Transcendental Experience of Na¢t
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
76 views Abstract
2025
Status of People of Cloak in the Poetry of Mirza Ghalib & Allama Iqbal [A research analysis]
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 22-32
73 views Abstract
2025
Status of People of Cloak in the Poetry of Mirza Ghalib & Allama Iqbal [A research analysis]
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 22-32
72 views Abstract
2024
2025
The Essence and Evolution of Naat Poetry in Islamic Tradition
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 6-12
67 views Abstract
2025
The Emotional Palette: Exploring the Power of Color in Art and Human Perception
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 33-39
64 views Abstract
2025
Phenomenology of the Transcendental Experience of Na¢t
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
144 views DOI Abstract
2025
The Essence and Evolution of Naat Poetry in Islamic Tradition
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 6-12
67 views Abstract
2025
Status of People of Cloak in the Poetry of Mirza Ghalib & Allama Iqbal [A research analysis]
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 22-32
73 views Abstract
2025
The Emotional Palette: Exploring the Power of Color in Art and Human Perception
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 33-39
64 views Abstract
2025
Phenomenology of the Transcendental Experience of Na¢t
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 1-5
76 views Abstract
2025
Status of People of Cloak in the Poetry of Mirza Ghalib & Allama Iqbal [A research analysis]
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 22-32
72 views Abstract
2025
The Emotional Palette: Exploring the Power of Color in Art and Human Perception
Vol. 2 , No. 1 , pp. 33-39
89 views Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #18,903 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis 51.2/100

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

Estimated 2 countries represented

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

10.5/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

20.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

50.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

60.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

35.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

85.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

20.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Estimated 2 countries represented

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.