journal of communications | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1928 / 33,952
📉 Poor
Overall Score
39.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
35
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 3 days ago

journal of communications

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus
Short Name journal of communications
Abbreviated Name journal of communications
ISSN
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (95 total)

2017
effect of depression on renal function as well as oxidative stress and inflammatory response in patients with diabetic nephropathy
;Xiu-Zhu Lin
Vol. 23 , No. 5 , pp. 140-143
590 views Abstract
2018
effect of nutritional support + intravenous chemotherapy on antitumor immunity and cancer cell proliferation in patients with colon cancer complicated by incomplete intestinal obstruction
;Yu-Fang Xie;Jian-Feng Guo
Vol. 24 , pp. 85-88
541 views Abstract
2017
regulating effect of liraglutide therapy on metabolic disorders in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes complicated with obesity
;Dong-Mei Gao;Shan-Dan Bao
Vol. 23 , No. 16 , pp. 37-40
505 views Abstract
2017
effects of laparoscopic operation combined neoadjuvant chemotherapy on serum levels of cea, ca242, ca19-9, ca724, icam-1 and vcam-1 in patients with colorectal carcinoma
;Wen-Jie Xie;Yan-Hong Li;Chang-Fang Xie;Xin-Liang Liu;Shuai Zhang
Vol. 23 , No. 15 , pp. 77-81
487 views Abstract
2016
real-time tissue elastography in the evaluation of liver cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis b
;Zhan-Fang Wei;Yong-Ping Wu;Li-Sha Ma;Ling-Mei Duan
Vol. 22 , No. 16 , pp. 158-160
469 views Abstract
2016
relationship of vitamin d deficiency with glucolipid metabolism and insulin resistance in obese children
;Wei Sun
Vol. 22 , No. 13 , pp. 116-119
461 views Abstract
2017
effect of remifentanil combined with etomidate on systemic stress reaction during painless fiberoptic bronchoscopy
;Dong-Wu Xie
Vol. 23 , No. 8 , pp. 142-145
447 views Abstract
2017
effects of adjuvant therapy with anluohuaxian capsule on serum inflammatory factors, hepatic fibrosis indexes and immune function in patients with hepatitis b cirrhosis
;Tong-Hua Wang;Xi-Han Zhou;Shou-Gao HE;Jian-Wei Su;Qi Jiang;Gao-Yu Hu
Vol. 23 , No. 16 , pp. 17-20
429 views Abstract
2016
effect of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell adjuvant therapy on liver function and fibrosis indicators as well as the degree of inflammation in patients with hepatitis b cirrhosis
;Gui-Jin Luo;Ping-Guang Lei
Vol. 22 , No. 11 , pp. 32-35
415 views Abstract
2016
effect of immunoglobulin on t cell subsets and inflammatory cytokines of patients with viral meningoencephalitis
;Zhi-Cheng Bao;Xue-Long Xia;Ya-Ping Wu;Dan Liu
Vol. 22 , No. 19 , pp. 63-66
406 views Abstract
View All 95 Articles
40
Overall
Poor
30
15
30
40
35
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

39.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

35.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.