Indexed in Journament

Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences

ISSN 3078-8846· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.9 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #247 of 29,339 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
15 Articles
Scores higher than 99.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

The primary aim of Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences (DHSS) is to cultivate and encourage new, exciting, stimulating, and often unusual and unprecedented debates across the discipline of social Sciences, and across all the many parts of the world where social sciences is practiced. The journal aims to be a central node for debate-creation and knowledge-formation. It seeks to both reflect and cover current debates in and across the field, while also provoking new ones too. It allows groups of authors to thematize debates that are emerging or have yet only been carried out implicitly. The journal also aims to create a dynamic platform for the dissemination of high-quality, interdisciplinary research that addresses the pressing social, economic, political, and cultural challenges facing societies today. The journal welcomes contributions from a broad range of social science disciplines, including but not limited to sociology, anthropology, political science and international relations, criminology, social work, law, economics, media and communication studies, education, and psychology etc. We are particularly interested in research that crosses traditional disciplinary boundaries, engages with contemporary theoretical debates, and offers new insights into global and local issues such as inequality, governance, human rights, environmental sustainability, and social justice. Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences seeks to publish work that not only contributes to academic knowledge but also has practical implications for policymakers, practitioners, and communities.
Short Name Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences
Abbreviated Name DHSS
ISSN 3078-8846
URL https://dialogueshss.com/index.php/dhss/index
Author Instructions https://dialogueshss.com/index.php/dhss/guidelines-for-authors

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 60.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 5.7
Content Distribution 74.4
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for Dialogues in Humanities and Social Sciences
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.2
Accessibility 30.0 17.8
Timeliness 60.0 15.9
Diversity 28.3
Innovation 70.0 30.1
Community Impact 5.7 11.5
Content Distribution 74.4 88.5
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (15)

2025
Culture: An Alternative Variable to Race in Criminology
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 47-62
223 views DOI Abstract
2025
Drug Trafficking in the Ferizaj region of Kosovo in the period 2018-2022
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 73-79
222 views DOI Abstract
2025
Singapore-US Relations 2004-2024:From the Perspective of International Relations Theories
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
218 views DOI Abstract
2025
Legal awareness as a factor in preventing illegal (deviant) behavior
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 09-16
212 views DOI Abstract
2024
Defamiliarizing Symbols in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher: A Formalist analysis
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 43-50
202 views DOI Abstract
2025
The impact of globalisation on economic systems and social structures
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 63-72
191 views DOI Abstract
2024
Cultural Significance of Recent Homicide of 7-year-old Ute Mountain Boy
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 51-53
182 views DOI Abstract
2025
Pakistan’s Role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) from 2011-2024: A Comparative Analysis to Other Member States
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
172 views DOI Abstract
2025
Drug Trafficking in the Ferizaj region of Kosovo in the period 2018-2022
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 73-79
222 views DOI Abstract
2025
The impact of globalisation on economic systems and social structures
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 63-72
191 views DOI Abstract
2025
Culture: An Alternative Variable to Race in Criminology
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 47-62
223 views DOI Abstract
2025
Singapore-US Relations 2004-2024:From the Perspective of International Relations Theories
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 29-38
218 views DOI Abstract
2025
Pakistan’s Role in the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) from 2011-2024: A Comparative Analysis to Other Member States
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 17-28
172 views DOI Abstract
2025
Legal awareness as a factor in preventing illegal (deviant) behavior
Vol. 3 , No. 1 , pp. 09-16
212 views DOI Abstract
2024
Cultural Significance of Recent Homicide of 7-year-old Ute Mountain Boy
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 51-53
182 views DOI Abstract
2024
Defamiliarizing Symbols in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Fall of the House of Usher: A Formalist analysis
Vol. 2 , No. 2 , pp. 43-50
202 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.9/100 · Below Average
Ranked #247 of 29,339 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

45.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

5.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

60.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

74.4/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.