Indexed in Journament

annals of the university of oradea: economic science

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
37.5 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #2,734 of 29,298 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
31 Articles
Scores higher than 90.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name annals of the university of oradea: economic science
Abbreviated Name annals of the university of oradea: economic science

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 10.0
Content Distribution 71.0
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility — 22.5
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 22.7
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 10.0 4.2
Content Distribution 71.0 88.7
Content Quality — 55.5
Ethics & Transparency — 40.2
Editorial Standards — 33.4
Publication Regularity — 53.2
Geographic Reach — 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (31)

2017
MANAGEMENT SKILLS ASSESMENT
Liviu, Vele Cristian -;Cezara, Toader Diana;Sabina, Ighian Diana;Cezar, Toader;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 877-881
455 views Abstract
2010
CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY DURING THE ECONOMIC CRISIS. THE CASE OF THE ROMANIAN COMPANIES
Cosmin-Silviu-Raul, JOLDES;Laura-Gabriela, CONSTANTIN;Irina-Eugenia, IAMANDI;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 963-969
445 views Abstract
2012
RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACHES AND PRACTICES IN IT PROJECTS
Claudiu, BRANDAS;Nicolae, BIBU;Otniel, DIDRAGA;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 1014-1020
392 views Abstract
2017
LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE IN QATAR’S PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS
SHAHER, ALSHAMARI;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 725-729
388 views Abstract
2008
European „C” quest: community, competitiveness, convergence, cohesion. what should the “eu new comer romanians” aim for?
Octavian-Dragomir, Jora;Mihai-Vladimir, Topan;Radu-Cristian, Musetescu;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 343-349
380 views Abstract
2014
IMPLEMENTING FISCAL OR MONETARY POLICY IN TIME OF CRISIS? RUNNING GRANGER CAUSALITY TO TEST THE PHILLIPS CURVE IN SOME EURO ZONE COUNTRIES
Gianluigi, Nico;
Vol. 24 , No. 2 , pp. 154-164
376 views Abstract
2013
STABILITY, BIFURCATIONS AND CHAOS IN UNEMPLOYMENT NON-LINEAR DYNAMICS
Carmen, Pagliari;Nicola, Mattoscio;Iacopo, Odoardi;Fabiana, Tenerelli;
Vol. 22 , No. 1 , pp. 736-745
374 views Abstract
2010
THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF INTEGRATED INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN THE RESTRUCTURING AND EUROPEAN INTEGRATION PROCESS OF ORGANIZATIONS
Nela, Steliac;Diana-Aderina, Moisuc;
Vol. 1 , No. 2 , pp. 1202-1207
373 views Abstract
2012
PRICE VS QUALITY COMPETITION AND THE SPATIAL PATTERN OF AVERAGE PRICES IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE
Nicola, Mattoscio;Francesca, Affortunato;
Vol. 1 , No. 1 , pp. 204-210
359 views Abstract
2018
MOBILE PAYMENTS AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
CHIRIAC, Claudiu;HURDUZEU, Gheorghe;(ROSCA), Andreea-Alexandra CHIRIAC;ZAVERA, Ioana-Coralia;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 129-139
342 views Abstract
2018
MOBILE PAYMENTS AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES
CHIRIAC, Claudiu;HURDUZEU, Gheorghe;(ROSCA), Andreea-Alexandra CHIRIAC;ZAVERA, Ioana-Coralia;
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 129-139
342 views Abstract
2017
DO GROUP AFFILIATED AND UNAFFILIATED FIRMS HOLD CASH DIFFERENTLY? THE CASE OF PAKISTAN
Ishtiaq, Ahmad;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 373-384
58 views Abstract
2017
LITERATURE REVIEW ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE AND PERFORMANCE IN QATAR’S PUBLIC SECTOR ORGANIZATIONS
SHAHER, ALSHAMARI;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 725-729
388 views Abstract
2017
MANAGEMENT SKILLS ASSESMENT
Liviu, Vele Cristian -;Cezara, Toader Diana;Sabina, Ighian Diana;Cezar, Toader;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 877-881
455 views Abstract
2017
IMPACT OF NON-PERFORMING ASSETS ON THE PROFITABILITY OF BANKS – A SELECTIVE STUDY
Chetan, Dudhe;
Vol. 28 , No. 1 , pp. 307-314
268 views Abstract
2016
ONLINE PROMOTION OF FINANCIAL INVESTMENT SERVICES COMPANIES
Iancu, Ioana Ancuta;Stanciu, Ionut Dorin;
Vol. 25 , No. 2 , pp. 575-581
160 views Abstract
2015
a new method for segmentation of multiple sclerosis (ms) lesions on brain mr images
;Simin Jafari;Ali Reza Karimian
Vol. 6 , No. 21 , pp. 21-30
323 views Abstract
2015
IMPLEMENTATION OF CORPORATE VALUATION TECHNIQUES IN PRACTICE
Anita, Kiss;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 831-838
292 views Abstract
2015
LITERATURE REVIEW ON CORPORATE GOVERNANCE - FIRM PERFORMANCE RELATIONSHIP
Mirela-Oana, Pintea;Melinda-Timea, Fulop;
Vol. 25 , No. 1 , pp. 98-854
199 views Abstract
2014
content-based medical image retrieval based on image feature projection in relevance feedback level
;Mohammad Behnam;Hossein Pourghasem
Vol. 5 , No. 17 , pp. 3-14
281 views Abstract
Journament Score
37.5/100 · Poor
Ranked #2,734 of 29,298 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

37.5/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

10.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

71.0/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.