risks | Journament

Journal Ranking

#782 / 33,958
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
42.7/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
36
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

risks

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name risks
Abbreviated Name risks
ISSN 2227-9091
Aim and Scope
Aims Risks (ISSN 2227-9091) is an international, peer-reviewed scholarly open access journal of research and studies on insurance and financial risk management. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications; there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles. Scopes Insurance Financial Risk Management Asset Pricing Statistical Modeling Insurance Finance Insurance Markets Insurance Institutions Insurance Regulation Actuarial Sciences
URL https://www.mdpi.com/journal/risks
Author Instructions https://www.mdpi.com/journal/risks/instructions
Added by Said Nadeem on Aug 24, 2019

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (89 total)

2020
Neural Networks and Betting Strategies for Tennis
Vincenzo Candila;Lucio Palazzo;Candila, Vincenzo;Palazzo, Lucio;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 68-
417 views DOI Abstract
2020
Heads and Tails of Earnings Management: Quantitative Analysis in Emerging Countries
Pavol Durana;Katarina Valaskova;Darina Chlebikova;Vladislav Krastev;Irina Atanasova;Durana, Pavol;Valaskova, Katarina;Chlebikova, Darina;Krastev, Vladislav;Atanasova, Irina;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 57-
371 views DOI Abstract
2015
Hidden Markov Model for Stock Selection
Nguyen, Nguyet;Nguyen, Dung;
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 455-473
333 views Abstract
2018
Firm’s Credit Risk in the Presence of Market Structural Breaks
Xing, Haipeng;Yu, Yang;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 136-
322 views Abstract
2020
Bankruptcy Prediction and Stress Quantification Using Support Vector Machine: Evidence from Indian Banks
Santosh Kumar Shrivastav,P. Janaki Ramudu;Santosh Kumar Shrivastav;P. Janaki Ramudu;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 52-
303 views DOI Abstract
2019
Recent regulation in credit risk management: A statistical framework
Ewanchuk, L.
Vol. 7 , pp. 0-0
292 views DOI
2018
The Value-At-Risk Estimate of Stock and Currency-Stock Portfolios’ Returns
Su, Jung-Bin;Hung, Jui-Cheng;
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 133-
279 views Abstract
2020
A Multi-State Approach to Modelling Intermediate Events and Multiple Mortgage Loan Outcomes
Richard Chamboko;Jorge Miguel Bravo;Chamboko, Richard;Bravo, Jorge Miguel;
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 64-
276 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Index-Based Longevity Hedging and Measurement of Longevity Basis Risk
Uditha Balasooriya;Johnny Siu-Hang Li;Jackie Li;Balasooriya, Uditha;Li, Johnny Siu-Hang;Li, Jackie;
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 80-
275 views DOI Abstract
2017
Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit
Fry, John;Brint, Andrew;
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
275 views Abstract
View All 89 Articles
43
Overall
Below Average
31
45
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.