Indexed in Journament

risks

ISSN 2227-9091· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
42.7/100
Journament Score
#1,771
Journament Rank
89
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Aims Risks (ISSN 2227-9091) is an international, peer-reviewed scholarly open access journal of research and studies on insurance and financial risk management. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and communications; there is no restriction on the length of the papers. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical research in as much detail as possible. Full experimental and/or methodical details must be provided for research articles. Scopes Insurance Financial Risk Management Asset Pricing Statistical Modeling Insurance Finance Insurance Markets Insurance Institutions Insurance Regulation Actuarial Sciences
Short Name risks
Abbreviated Name risks
ISSN 2227-9091
URL https://www.mdpi.com/journal/risks
Author Instructions https://www.mdpi.com/journal/risks/instructions

Indexings

scopus doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (89)

2020
Neural Networks and Betting Strategies for Tennis
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 68-
470 views DOI Abstract
2020
Heads and Tails of Earnings Management: Quantitative Analysis in Emerging Countries
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 57-
398 views DOI Abstract
2015
Hidden Markov Model for Stock Selection
Vol. 3 , No. 4 , pp. 455-473
365 views Abstract
2018
Firm’s Credit Risk in the Presence of Market Structural Breaks
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 136-
355 views Abstract
2020
Bankruptcy Prediction and Stress Quantification Using Support Vector Machine: Evidence from Indian Banks
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 52-
340 views DOI Abstract
2019
2020
A Multi-State Approach to Modelling Intermediate Events and Multiple Mortgage Loan Outcomes
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 64-
316 views DOI Abstract
2020
The Impact of Model Uncertainty on Index-Based Longevity Hedging and Measurement of Longevity Basis Risk
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 80-
309 views DOI Abstract
2018
The Value-At-Risk Estimate of Stock and Currency-Stock Portfolios’ Returns
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 133-
303 views Abstract
2017
Bubbles, Blind-Spots and Brexit
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 37-
303 views Abstract
2020
Portfolio Construction by Using Different Risk Models: A Comparison among Diverse Economic Scenarios
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 126-
244 views DOI Abstract
2020
Technical Analysis on the Bitcoin Market: Trading Opportunities or Investors’ Pitfall?
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 44-
269 views DOI Abstract
2020
Neural Networks and Betting Strategies for Tennis
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 68-
470 views DOI Abstract
2020
How Does Split Announcement Affect Stock Liquidity? Evidence from Bursa Malaysia
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 85-
185 views DOI Abstract
2020
Hedging on Betting Markets
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 88-
240 views DOI Abstract
2020
Tail Risk Transmission: A Study of the Iran Food Industry
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 78-
300 views DOI Abstract
2020
Joshi’s Split Tree for Option Pricing
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 81-
146 views DOI Abstract
2020
Variance and Interest Rate Risk in Unit-Linked Insurance Policies
Vol. 8 , No. 3 , pp. 84-
118 views DOI Abstract
2020
Die Hard: Probability of Default and Soft Information
Vol. 8 , No. 2 , pp. 46-
257 views DOI Abstract
2020
Machine Learning in Least-Squares Monte Carlo Proxy Modeling of Life Insurance Companies
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 21-
262 views DOI Abstract
43
Overall
Below Average
31
45
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

42.7/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.5/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.