Indexed in Journament

CharlestedaL

ISSN https://www.asicsgel.de· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
34.0 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #17,772 of 29,341 scored journals (33,995 indexed)
Scores higher than 39.4% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Nqdt Acceleprise Accelerator Aims $3.5M Fund At Early Stage Enterprise Apps Thomas HwangContributorThomas Hwang is a health policy researcher and an investor at Bain Capital.Technology promises to transform healthcare. It s redefining how we interact with, <a href=https://www.stanleycup.lt>stanley gertuves</a> and act on, our health data, and reshaping how care is delivered and coordinated. But uptake so far has been limited, particularl <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.us>stanley cup</a> y聽among the elderly, those with chronic conditions and others who could benefit most from a better, smarter healthcare system.To understand why, we need to look at federal reimbursement policies and their far-reaching,聽albeit often overlooked, influence on tech innovation.Payment rules shape access to technologyEvery year, CMS the Centers for Medicare and <a href=https://www.stanleycups.at>stanley quencher</a> Medicaid Services develops regulations governing the payment of treatments and services provided to the one in three Americans covered by Medicare or Medicaid. They determine not only which technologies will be funded, but also how, when and at what level they will be reimbursed.Payment matters. So to lack reimbursement is, effe Idww Responding to the demand for reliable data collection in Africa, mSurvey raises seed funding Instacube started with a relatively lofty goal for its Android-powered digital photo frame at $250,000, but hit that mark pretty quickly it took less than a week . Since then, the project creators have set two stretch goals including the Facebook one announced today. The first were black and white versions, which were unlocked when the project hit $400,000. Then, earlier this week, Instacube announced a partners <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley flaschen</a> hip with SmartThings, which will allow the cube to display notifications for things like visitors arriving or leaving the lights on. It ;ll also be able to control home automation systems that SmartThings can operating, making it much more than just a pretty face.Facebook integ <a href=https://www.stanley-cups.es>stanley universitario</a> ration is a logical addition, especially since despite Instagram success, it still far and away the more <a href=https://www.stanley-cup.com.de>stanley cups</a> popular venue for sharing photos with likely over 200 billion shared at this point. For users, that means that the Instacube becomes a much more broadly useful tool, which
Short Name CharlestedaL
Abbreviated Name CharlestedaL
ISSN https://www.asicsgel.de
URL https://www.asicsgel.de
Author Instructions https://www.asicsgel.de

Quality Profile

4 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.2
Accessibility 30.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 0.7
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

8 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 4 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for CharlestedaL
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.2 30.1
Accessibility 30.0 17.9
Timeliness 19.2
Diversity 28.8
Innovation 70.0 31.2
Community Impact 0.7 13.4
Content Distribution 88.4
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Articles (0)

No articles found
This journal doesn't have any indexed articles yet.
Journament Score
34.0/100 · Poor
Ranked #17,772 of 29,341 scored
(33,995 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

34.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

0.7/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

Not yet measured

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.