journal of the american college of radiology : jacr | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2968 / 33,981
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.9/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

journal of the american college of radiology : jacr

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Certificate of Indexing
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name j am coll radiol
Abbreviated Name j am coll radiol
ISSN 1558-349X
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.journals.elsevier.com/journal-of-the-american-college-of-radiology
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (22 total)

2019
The Potential Role of Radiomics and Radiogenomics in Patient Stratification by Tumor Hypoxia Status.
Marcu, Loredana G;Forster, Jake C;Bezak, Eva;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 Pt B , pp. 1329-1337
421 views DOI Abstract
2019
Psychometric Validation of a Nonproprietary Survey of Patient Satisfaction for Use in Outpatient Radiology Centers.
Dibble, Elizabeth H;Ryan, Valerie M;Baird, Grayson L;Swenson, David W;Healey, Terrance T;
406 views DOI Abstract
2019
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats Analysis of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Applications in Radiology.
Martín Noguerol, Teodoro;Paulano-Godino, Félix;Martín-Valdivia, María Teresa;Menias, Christine O;Luna, Antonio;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 Pt B , pp. 1239-1247
354 views DOI Abstract
2019
Pilot Feasibility Study of an Oncology Financial Navigation Program in Brain Cancer Patients.
Sadigh, Gelareh;Gallagher, Kathleen;Obenchain, Jennifer;Benson, Al;Mitchell, Edith;Sengupta, Soma;Carlos, Ruth C;
Vol. 16 , No. 10 , pp. 1420-1424
336 views DOI
2017
ACR Appropriateness Criteria Imaging for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
, ;Leipsic, Jonathon A;Blanke, Philipp;Hanley, Michael;Batlle, Juan C;Bolen, Michael A;Brown, Richard K J;Desjardins, Benoit;Eberhardt, Robert T;Gornik, Heather L;Hurwitz, Lynne M;Maniar, Hersh;Patel, Himanshu J;Sheybani, Elizabeth F;Steigner, Michael L;Verma, Nupur;Abbara, Suhny;Rybicki, Frank J;Kirsch, Jacobo;Dill, Karin E;
Vol. 14 , No. 11S , pp. S449-S455
334 views DOI Abstract
2019
A Survey of Deep-Learning Applications in Ultrasound: Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ultrasound for Improving Clinical Workflow.
Akkus, Zeynettin;Cai, Jason;Boonrod, Arunnit;Zeinoddini, Atefeh;Weston, Alexander D;Philbrick, Kenneth A;Erickson, Bradley J;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 Pt B , pp. 1318-1328
327 views DOI Abstract
2017
2017 ACR Annual Meeting Open-Microphone Session: Navigating the Landscape of Changing Practice Models: Private Practice, Corporate Radiology, and Enterprise Systems.
Stern, Eric J;Everett, Catherine;Friedberg, Eric B;Kotsenas, Amy L;Glover, McKinley;Lightfoote, Johnson B;Lall, Neil;Swan, Timothy L;
Vol. 14 , No. 11 , pp. 1384-1387
313 views DOI Abstract
2019
The Application of Machine Learning to Quality Improvement Through the Lens of the Radiology Value Network.
Makeeva, Valeria;Gichoya, Judy;Hawkins, C Matthew;Towbin, Alexander J;Heilbrun, Marta;Prater, Adam;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 Pt B , pp. 1254-1258
295 views DOI Abstract
2019
Artificial Intelligence and Clinical Decision Support for Radiologists and Referring Providers.
Bizzo, Bernardo C;Almeida, Renata R;Michalski, Mark H;Alkasab, Tarik K;
Vol. 16 , No. 9 Pt B , pp. 1351-1356
287 views DOI Abstract
2019
Gender Diversity Within the American Board of Radiology: History, Current Status, and Future Implications.
Wallner, Paul E;Frey, G Donald;Roberts, Anne C;Canon, Cheri L;Jackson, Valerie P;Wagner, Brent J;
286 views DOI
View All 22 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.9/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.