Indexed in Journament

thrombosis and haemostasis

ISSN 2567-689X· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
28.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #23,787 of 29,312 scored journals (34,012 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 18.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name thromb haemost
Abbreviated Name thromb haemost
ISSN 2567-689X
URL https://www.thieme.com/books-main/internal-medicine/product/4432-thrombosis-and-haemostasis

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for thrombosis and haemostasis
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 20.4
Timeliness 0.0 5.8
Diversity 5.6 24.4
Innovation 70.0 25.7
Community Impact 7.1 5.8
Content Distribution 61.5 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2020
High-Content Immunophenotyping and Hierarchical Clustering Reveal Sources of Heterogeneity and New Surface Markers of Human Blood Monocyte Subsets.
Vol. 120 , No. 1 , pp. 141-155
412 views DOI Abstract
2000
Outcome and one year follow-up of intra-arterial staphylokinase in 191 patients with peripheral arterial occlusion.
Vol. 83 , No. 5 , pp. 666-71
410 views Abstract
2019
Determinants of the Quality of Warfarin Control after Venous Thromboembolism and Validation of the SAMe-TT2-R2 Score: An Analysis of Hokusai-VTE.
Vol. 119 , No. 4 , pp. 675-684
391 views DOI Abstract
2018
Overcoming Heparin-Associated RT-qPCR Inhibition and Normalization Issues for microRNA Quantification in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Vol. 118 , No. 7 , pp. 1257-1269
374 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Edoxaban on the Cellular and Protein Phase of Coagulation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and Clopidogrel: Results of the EDOX-APT Study.
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship of Platelet Reactivity and Inflammatory Markers to Recurrent Adverse Events in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
332 views DOI Abstract
2014
an investigation of science teachers’ teaching methods and techniques: amasya case
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 436-462
276 views DOI Abstract
2019
Global Use of Idarucizumab in Clinical Practice: Outcomes of the RE-VECTO Surveillance Program.
269 views DOI Abstract
2012
effects of project based learning of the “solar system and beyond: space puzzle” unit on student achievement
Vol. 5 , No. 3 , pp. 254-277
245 views Abstract
2013
an investigation of pre-service classroom teachers’ science process skills in terms of some variables
Vol. 6 , No. 4 , pp. 520-534
237 views DOI Abstract
2020
High-Content Immunophenotyping and Hierarchical Clustering Reveal Sources of Heterogeneity and New Surface Markers of Human Blood Monocyte Subsets.
Vol. 120 , No. 1 , pp. 141-155
412 views DOI Abstract
2019
Determinants of the Quality of Warfarin Control after Venous Thromboembolism and Validation of the SAMe-TT2-R2 Score: An Analysis of Hokusai-VTE.
Vol. 119 , No. 4 , pp. 675-684
391 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effects of Edoxaban on the Cellular and Protein Phase of Coagulation in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy with Aspirin and Clopidogrel: Results of the EDOX-APT Study.
361 views DOI Abstract
2019
Global Use of Idarucizumab in Clinical Practice: Outcomes of the RE-VECTO Surveillance Program.
269 views DOI Abstract
2019
Relationship of Platelet Reactivity and Inflammatory Markers to Recurrent Adverse Events in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.
332 views DOI Abstract
2018
Overcoming Heparin-Associated RT-qPCR Inhibition and Normalization Issues for microRNA Quantification in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction.
Vol. 118 , No. 7 , pp. 1257-1269
374 views DOI Abstract
2014
teacher opinions about evaluation of 6th grade english lesson curriculum in primary schools
Vol. 7 , No. 2 , pp. 172-194
143 views DOI Abstract
2014
an investigation of science teachers’ teaching methods and techniques: amasya case
Vol. 7 , No. 4 , pp. 436-462
276 views DOI Abstract
2013
2013
scientific attitude levels of gifted students (a case from malatya)
Vol. 6 , No. 3 , pp. 434-454
170 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
28.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #23,787 of 29,312 scored
(34,012 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

28.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

61.5/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.