society for advancement of management: advanced management journal | Journament

Journal Ranking

#1143 / 33,956
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.5/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
30
Accessibility
45
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 week ago

society for advancement of management: advanced management journal

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
Short Name sam advanced management jouranl
Abbreviated Name sam-amj
ISSN 0749-7075
Aim and Scope
One of the oldest journals in the management field that publishes double-blind peer-reviewed publications that elevate and advance the practice of management. We focus on translational work, converting theoretical insights into practical, actionable knowledge for management practitioners.
URL http://www.samnational.org/journal
Author Instructions http://www.samnational.org/journal

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (16 total)

2018
patterns and levels of sedentary behavior and physical activity in a general japanese population: the hisayama study
;Tao Chen;Hiro Kishimoto;Takanori Honda;Jun Hata;Daigo Yoshida;Naoko Mukai;Mao Shibata;Toshiharu Ninomiya;Shuzo Kumagai
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 260-265
512 views DOI Abstract
2018
body-mass index and pancreatic cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of nine population-based cohort studies with more than 340,000 japanese subjects
;Yuriko N. Koyanagi;Keitaro Matsuo;Hidemi Ito;Akiko Tamakoshi;Yumi Sugawara;Akihisa Hidaka;Keiko Wada;Isao Oze;Yuri Kitamura;Rong Liu;Tetsuya Mizoue;Norie Sawada;Chisato Nagata;Kenji Wakai;Tomio Nakayama;Atsuko Sadakane;Keitaro Tanaka;Manami Inoue;Shoichiro Tsugane;Shizuka Sasazuki
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 245-252
433 views DOI Abstract
2017
relationship between pulmonary function and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels in health checkups: a cross-sectional observational study in japanese participants
;Saigo Baba
Vol. 27 , No. 11 , pp. 511-515
415 views DOI Abstract
2015
incidences of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in japanese adults aged 50 years and older from a community-based prospective cohort study: the shez study
;Yukiko Takao
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 617-625
339 views DOI Abstract
2018
factors related to participation in health examinations for japanese national health insurance: nippon data2010
;Haruhiko Imamura;Mana Kogure;Yoshikuni Kita;Hideaki Nakagawa;Atsushi Hozawa;Tomonori Okamura;Yoshitaka Murakami;Nobuo Nishi;Nagako Okuda;Aya Kadota;Takayoshi Ohkubo;Hirotsugu Ueshima;Akira Okayama;Katsuyuki Miura
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. S53-S58
316 views DOI Abstract
2020
number of teeth and all-cause and cancer mortality in a japanese community: the takayama study
;Yuko Goto;Keiko Wada;Takahiro Uji;Sachi Koda;Fumi Mizuta;Michiyo Yamakawa;Chisato Nagata
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 213-218
315 views DOI Abstract
2016
non-fatal injury in thailand from 2005 to 2013: incidence trends and links to alcohol consumption patterns in the thai cohort study
;Mami Wakabayashi
Vol. 26 , No. 9 , pp. 471-480
311 views DOI Abstract
2016
validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for collegiate athletes
;Ayaka Sunam
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 284-291
306 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of birth weight on adult-onset diabetes mellitus in relation to current body mass index: the japan nurses' health study
;Kota Katanoda
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 428-434
277 views DOI Abstract
2016
association between social participation and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults
;Kimiko Tomioka
Vol. 26 , No. 10 , pp. 553-561
267 views DOI Abstract
View All 16 Articles
42
Overall
Below Average
30
45
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

41.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.3/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

45.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.