Indexed in Journament

society for advancement of management: advanced management journal

ISSN 0749-7075· EN

Journal Website Guide for Authors Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
32.6 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #11,835 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
16 Articles
Scores higher than 59.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

One of the oldest journals in the management field that publishes double-blind peer-reviewed publications that elevate and advance the practice of management. We focus on translational work, converting theoretical insights into practical, actionable knowledge for management practitioners.
Nombre Corto sam advanced management jouranl
Nombre Abreviado sam-amj
ISSN 0749-7075
URL http://www.samnational.org/journal
Instrucciones para Autores http://www.samnational.org/journal

Quality Profile

6 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 30.6
Accessibility 30.0
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 54.0
Community Impact 2.9
Content Distribution 69.3
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

6 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 6 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.6 30.4
Accessibility 30.0 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.1
Innovation 54.0 24.1
Community Impact 2.9 4.2
Content Distribution 69.3 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (16)

2018
patterns and levels of sedentary behavior and physical activity in a general japanese population: the hisayama study
;Tao Chen;Hiro Kishimoto;Takanori Honda;Jun Hata;Daigo Yoshida;Naoko Mukai;Mao Shibata;Toshiharu Ninomiya;Shuzo Kumagai
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 260-265
585 views DOI Abstract
2018
body-mass index and pancreatic cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of nine population-based cohort studies with more than 340,000 japanese subjects
;Yuriko N. Koyanagi;Keitaro Matsuo;Hidemi Ito;Akiko Tamakoshi;Yumi Sugawara;Akihisa Hidaka;Keiko Wada;Isao Oze;Yuri Kitamura;Rong Liu;Tetsuya Mizoue;Norie Sawada;Chisato Nagata;Kenji Wakai;Tomio Nakayama;Atsuko Sadakane;Keitaro Tanaka;Manami Inoue;Shoichiro Tsugane;Shizuka Sasazuki
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 245-252
485 views DOI Abstract
2017
relationship between pulmonary function and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels in health checkups: a cross-sectional observational study in japanese participants
;Saigo Baba
Vol. 27 , No. 11 , pp. 511-515
464 views DOI Abstract
2015
incidences of herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia in japanese adults aged 50 years and older from a community-based prospective cohort study: the shez study
;Yukiko Takao
Vol. 25 , No. 10 , pp. 617-625
405 views DOI Abstract
2020
number of teeth and all-cause and cancer mortality in a japanese community: the takayama study
;Yuko Goto;Keiko Wada;Takahiro Uji;Sachi Koda;Fumi Mizuta;Michiyo Yamakawa;Chisato Nagata
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 213-218
367 views DOI Abstract
2016
non-fatal injury in thailand from 2005 to 2013: incidence trends and links to alcohol consumption patterns in the thai cohort study
;Mami Wakabayashi
Vol. 26 , No. 9 , pp. 471-480
363 views DOI Abstract
2018
factors related to participation in health examinations for japanese national health insurance: nippon data2010
;Haruhiko Imamura;Mana Kogure;Yoshikuni Kita;Hideaki Nakagawa;Atsushi Hozawa;Tomonori Okamura;Yoshitaka Murakami;Nobuo Nishi;Nagako Okuda;Aya Kadota;Takayoshi Ohkubo;Hirotsugu Ueshima;Akira Okayama;Katsuyuki Miura
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. S53-S58
362 views DOI Abstract
2016
validity of a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire for collegiate athletes
;Ayaka Sunam
Vol. 26 , No. 6 , pp. 284-291
361 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of birth weight on adult-onset diabetes mellitus in relation to current body mass index: the japan nurses' health study
;Kota Katanoda
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 428-434
346 views DOI Abstract
2016
association between social participation and instrumental activities of daily living among community-dwelling older adults
;Kimiko Tomioka
Vol. 26 , No. 10 , pp. 553-561
311 views DOI Abstract
2020
number of teeth and all-cause and cancer mortality in a japanese community: the takayama study
;Yuko Goto;Keiko Wada;Takahiro Uji;Sachi Koda;Fumi Mizuta;Michiyo Yamakawa;Chisato Nagata
Vol. 30 , No. 5 , pp. 213-218
367 views DOI Abstract
2018
body-mass index and pancreatic cancer incidence: a pooled analysis of nine population-based cohort studies with more than 340,000 japanese subjects
;Yuriko N. Koyanagi;Keitaro Matsuo;Hidemi Ito;Akiko Tamakoshi;Yumi Sugawara;Akihisa Hidaka;Keiko Wada;Isao Oze;Yuri Kitamura;Rong Liu;Tetsuya Mizoue;Norie Sawada;Chisato Nagata;Kenji Wakai;Tomio Nakayama;Atsuko Sadakane;Keitaro Tanaka;Manami Inoue;Shoichiro Tsugane;Shizuka Sasazuki
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 245-252
485 views DOI Abstract
2018
japanese legacy cohorts: a new series of special articles has started
;Kota Katanoda
Vol. 28 , No. 4 , pp. 161-161
127 views DOI
2018
motivating mothers to recommend their 20-year-old daughters receive cervical cancer screening: a randomized study
;Tomomi Egawa-Takata;Yutaka Ueda;Akiko Morimoto;Yusuke Tanaka;Asami Yagi;Yoshito Terai;Masahide Ohmichi;Tomoyuki Ichimura;Toshiyuki Sumi;Hiromi Murata;Hidetaka Okada;Hidekatsu Nakai;Masaki Mandai;Shinya Matsuzaki;Eiji Kobayashi;Kiyoshi Yoshino;Tadashi Kimura;Junko Saito;Yumiko Hori;Eiichi Morii;Tomio Nakayama;Mikiko Asai-Sato;Etsuko Miyagi;Masayuki Sekine;Takayuki Enomoto;Yorihiko Horikoshi;Tetsu Takagi;Kentaro Shimura
Vol. 28 , No. 3 , pp. 156-160
230 views DOI Abstract
2018
patterns and levels of sedentary behavior and physical activity in a general japanese population: the hisayama study
;Tao Chen;Hiro Kishimoto;Takanori Honda;Jun Hata;Daigo Yoshida;Naoko Mukai;Mao Shibata;Toshiharu Ninomiya;Shuzo Kumagai
Vol. 28 , No. 5 , pp. 260-265
585 views DOI Abstract
2018
intensity of leisure-time exercise and risk of depressive symptoms among japanese workers: a cohort study
;Keisuke Kuwahara;Toru Honda;Tohru Nakagawa;Shuichiro Yamamoto;Takeshi Hayashi;Tetsuya Mizoue
Vol. 28 , No. 2 , pp. 94-98
285 views DOI Abstract
2018
factors related to participation in health examinations for japanese national health insurance: nippon data2010
;Haruhiko Imamura;Mana Kogure;Yoshikuni Kita;Hideaki Nakagawa;Atsushi Hozawa;Tomonori Okamura;Yoshitaka Murakami;Nobuo Nishi;Nagako Okuda;Aya Kadota;Takayoshi Ohkubo;Hirotsugu Ueshima;Akira Okayama;Katsuyuki Miura
Vol. 28 , No. Suppl 3 , pp. S53-S58
362 views DOI Abstract
2017
relationship between pulmonary function and elevated glycated hemoglobin levels in health checkups: a cross-sectional observational study in japanese participants
;Saigo Baba
Vol. 27 , No. 11 , pp. 511-515
464 views DOI Abstract
2017
impact of birth weight on adult-onset diabetes mellitus in relation to current body mass index: the japan nurses' health study
;Kota Katanoda
Vol. 27 , No. 9 , pp. 428-434
346 views DOI Abstract
2016
investigation of the relationship between chronic stress and insulin resistance in a chinese population
;Yu-Xiang Yan
Vol. 26 , No. 7 , pp. 355-360
220 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
32.6/100 · Poor
Ranked #11,835 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

32.6/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

30.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

54.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

2.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

69.3/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.