Indexed in Journament

acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica

EN

Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
36.7 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #5,035 of 29,297 scored journals (34,016 indexed)
44 Articles
Scores higher than 82.8% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica
Abbreviated Name acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica

Quality Profile

5 of 12 dimensions measured
Engagement 31.2
Timeliness 0.0
Innovation 70.0
Community Impact 9.3
Content Distribution 66.8
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

7 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left out entirely rather than plotted as zero, and with 5 dimensions measured there is not enough of a profile to draw as a shape.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.2 30.5
Accessibility — 23.1
Timeliness 0.0 3.0
Diversity — 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 9.3 4.6
Content Distribution 66.8 89.3
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2013
Methods for determining the degree of underestimation or overrating of shares using PER analysis
Vasiliu, Andreea;Tabara, Neculai;
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 84-99
475 views Abstract
2016
Strategic Human Resource Metrics: A Perspective of the General Systems Theory
Iwu, Chux Gervase;Kapondoro, Lloyd;Twum-Darko, Michael;Lose, Thobekani;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-24
446 views Abstract
2012
Perceived Attributes of Factors Influencing Consumers’ Engagement with Electronic Banking
Muritala, Taiwo Adewale;Taiwo, Abayomi Samuel;
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 102-116
434 views Abstract
2017
Foreign Direct Investments and the Real Convergence. An Approach for Romania and Bulgaria
Cocriş, Vasile;Stoica, Ovidiu;Sârbu, Maria-Ramona;
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 374-394
413 views Abstract
2015
Impact Assessment of Bank Consolidation on the Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria
Jeroh, Edirin;Okoye, Emma;
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 30-44
390 views Abstract
2013
Decision Background and Financial Institutions: for What Contemporary Theoretical Reorientation?
St-Hilaire, Walter Gerard Amedzro;
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 171-190
341 views Abstract
2017
knowledge on bone banking among participants in an orthopaedic conference: a preliminary survey
;Mohd S;Yusof N;Ramalingam S;Ng WM;Mansor A
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
333 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Economic Trojan Horse is Actually a German Horse
Ionescu, Romeo-Victor;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-163
308 views Abstract
2012
clubfoot: the treatment outcome using quantitative assessment of deformity
;AH Rasit;H Azani;PA Zabidah;A Merikan;BA Nur Alyana
Vol. 7 , No. 3 , pp. 2-5
293 views DOI Abstract
2014
evaluating the clinical relevance of codon 594 (g>a) polymorphism of estrogen receptor alpha in knee osteoarthritis
;T Tawonsawatruk;P Mulpruek;DF Hamilton;W Wajanavisit
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 37-41
289 views DOI Abstract
2017
brodie’s abscess of posterior ilium with gluteal syndrome, an unusual cause of paediatric low back pain: a case report
;Behera G;Poduval M;Patro DK;Sahoo S
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 68-71
201 views DOI Abstract
2017
endoprosthetic reconstruction of distal humerus following resection of distal humeral giant cell tumours in six patients in rural india
;Balasubramanian N;Gnanasundaram R;Prakasam S
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 25-29
202 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge on bone banking among participants in an orthopaedic conference: a preliminary survey
;Mohd S;Yusof N;Ramalingam S;Ng WM;Mansor A
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
333 views DOI Abstract
2017
Foreign Direct Investments and the Real Convergence. An Approach for Romania and Bulgaria
Cocriş, Vasile;Stoica, Ovidiu;Sârbu, Maria-Ramona;
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 374-394
413 views Abstract
2017
Do Female Directors Add Value?
Nguyen, Tuan;
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 169-177
182 views Abstract
2016
the outcome of complex pelvic fracture after internal fixation surgery
;Ismail HD;Lubis MF;Djaja Y
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 16-21
126 views DOI Abstract
2016
calf compartment syndrome associated with the use of an intra-osseous line in an adult patient: a case report
;Malhotra R;Chua WL;O’Neill G
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 49-51
139 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Economic Trojan Horse is Actually a German Horse
Ionescu, Romeo-Victor;
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-163
308 views Abstract
2016
Strategic Human Resource Metrics: A Perspective of the General Systems Theory
Iwu, Chux Gervase;Kapondoro, Lloyd;Twum-Darko, Michael;Lose, Thobekani;
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-24
446 views Abstract
2015
outcome determining factors for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated operatively
;Nawfar SA;Chan KL;Idham HM;Izani IM;Nahulan T
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 8-16
116 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
36.7/100 · Poor
Ranked #5,035 of 29,297 scored
(34,016 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

36.7/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

9.3/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

66.8/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.