Indexed in Journament

acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica

EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
38.0/100
Journament Score
#10,013
Journament Rank
44
Articles Indexed

About This Journal

Short Name acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica
Abbreviated Name acta universitatis danubius: oeconomica

Indexings

doaj

Tools & Certificate of Indexing

Certificate of Indexing
Quality Badge Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's verified indexing scores on your website with our self-contained widget.

One-Line JavaScript Embed:
Advantages: Single-line script, seamless DOM integration, clickable badges linking to full journal profile.
Standard iFrame Embed Code:
Widget Preview:

Publications Per Year

Articles (44)

2013
Methods for determining the degree of underestimation or overrating of shares using PER analysis
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 84-99
443 views Abstract
2016
Strategic Human Resource Metrics: A Perspective of the General Systems Theory
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-24
412 views Abstract
2012
Perceived Attributes of Factors Influencing Consumers’ Engagement with Electronic Banking
Vol. 8 , No. 4 , pp. 102-116
410 views Abstract
2017
Foreign Direct Investments and the Real Convergence. An Approach for Romania and Bulgaria
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 374-394
385 views Abstract
2015
Impact Assessment of Bank Consolidation on the Performance of Commercial Banks in Nigeria
Vol. 11 , No. 5 , pp. 30-44
361 views Abstract
2013
Decision Background and Financial Institutions: for What Contemporary Theoretical Reorientation?
Vol. 9 , No. 5 , pp. 171-190
313 views Abstract
2017
knowledge on bone banking among participants in an orthopaedic conference: a preliminary survey
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
292 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Economic Trojan Horse is Actually a German Horse
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-163
280 views Abstract
2013
Saving Euro by dividing Europe in multiple OCA’s
Vol. 9 , No. 2 , pp. 107-119
253 views Abstract
2014
evaluating the clinical relevance of codon 594 (g>a) polymorphism of estrogen receptor alpha in knee osteoarthritis
Vol. 8 , No. 1 , pp. 37-41
242 views DOI Abstract
2017
brodie’s abscess of posterior ilium with gluteal syndrome, an unusual cause of paediatric low back pain: a case report
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 68-71
162 views DOI Abstract
2017
endoprosthetic reconstruction of distal humerus following resection of distal humeral giant cell tumours in six patients in rural india
Vol. 11 , No. 1 , pp. 25-29
162 views DOI Abstract
2017
knowledge on bone banking among participants in an orthopaedic conference: a preliminary survey
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. 1-6
292 views DOI Abstract
2017
Foreign Direct Investments and the Real Convergence. An Approach for Romania and Bulgaria
Vol. 13 , No. 4 , pp. 374-394
385 views Abstract
2017
Do Female Directors Add Value?
Vol. 13 , No. 3 , pp. 169-177
149 views Abstract
2016
the outcome of complex pelvic fracture after internal fixation surgery
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. 16-21
89 views DOI Abstract
2016
calf compartment syndrome associated with the use of an intra-osseous line in an adult patient: a case report
Vol. 10 , No. 3 , pp. 49-51
106 views DOI Abstract
2016
The Economic Trojan Horse is Actually a German Horse
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 151-163
280 views Abstract
2016
Strategic Human Resource Metrics: A Perspective of the General Systems Theory
Vol. 12 , No. 2 , pp. 5-24
412 views Abstract
2015
outcome determining factors for displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures treated operatively
Vol. 9 , No. 3 , pp. 8-16
79 views DOI Abstract
38
Overall
Poor
31
15
30
40
36
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.0/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

36.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.