problems and perspectives in management | Journament

Journal Ranking

#4630 / 33,971
📉 Poor
Overall Score
38.0/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
36
Accessibility
15
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
42
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

problems and perspectives in management

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus doaj
Short Name problems and perspectives in management
Abbreviated Name problems and perspectives in management
ISSN 0
Aim and Scope
URL
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (30 total)

2013
A study of the factors that influence the brand loyalty of Taiwanese adolescents with respect to purchasing mobile. The case of Taichung City
Lin, Tsai-Yuan;Chang, Min-Yen;
Vol. 11 , No. 2 , pp. -
419 views
2017
Conditions of formation and stimulation of the activators of innovative development of Ukraine
Shtuler, Iryna;Cherlenyak, Ivan;Domyshche-Medyanik, Alla;Voitovych, Sergii;
Vol. 15 , No. 4 , pp. 150-160
392 views Abstract
2017
Factors affecting employee turnover and sound retention strategies in business organization: a conceptual view
Mamun, Chowdhury Abdullah Al;Hasan, Md. Nazmul;
Vol. 15 , No. 1 , pp. 63-71
385 views Abstract
2018
Organizational citizenship behavior and team performance: a multiple level study in Indian higher education institutions
Nawaz, Nishad;Family Name Unknow, Given Name Unknow;Mary Gomes, Anjali;Family Name Unknow, Given Name Unknow;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 443-453
364 views DOI
2015
The model of human capital and knowledge sharing towards sustainable competitive advantages
Widodo
Vol. 13 , pp. 124-134
363 views
2012
Relationship between types of trust and level of adoption of internet banking
Kumar, M.
Vol. 10 , pp. 82-92
334 views
2015
Credit risk management and cyclicality of bank lending to non-financial corporations in Italy during the financial crisis: 2008-2012. A modeling study
Olgiati, Stefano;Danovi, Alessandro;
Vol. 13 , No. 2 , pp. 7-14
327 views
2018
Corporate diversity and corporate social environmental disclosure of listed manufacturing companies in Nigeria
Emmanuel, Ozordi;Uwuigbe, Uwalomwa;Teddy, Obarakpo;Tolulope, Ikumapayi;Eyitomi, Gbenedio Akpevwenoghene;
Vol. 16 , No. 3 , pp. 229-244
317 views Abstract
2020
The impact of human resource development practices on employee engagement and performance in Jordanian family restaurants
Rumman, A.A.
Vol. 18 , pp. 130-140
316 views DOI
2014
An exploration into family business and SMEs in South Africa
Visser, Thea;Chiloane-Tsoka, Evelyn;
Vol. 12 , No. 4 , pp. -
305 views
View All 30 Articles
38
Overall
Poor
36
15
30
40
42
50
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

38.0/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

36.2/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

15.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

42.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.