human reproduction (oxford, england) | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2748 / 33,968
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
40.4/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
65
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 2 weeks ago

human reproduction (oxford, england)

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
ncbi
Short Name hum reprod
Abbreviated Name hum reprod
ISSN 0268-1161
Aim and Scope
URL http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (83 total)

2020
The proliferative phase endometrium in IVF/ICSI: an in-cycle molecular analysis predictive of the outcome following fresh embryo transfer.
Mackens, S;Santos-Ribeiro, S;Racca, A;Daneels, D;Koch, A;Essahib, W;Verpoest, W;Bourgain, C;Van Riet, I;Tournaye, H;Brosens, J J;Lee, Y H;Blockeel, C;Van de Velde, H;
530 views DOI Abstract
2017
Parental contributions to early embryo development: influences of urinary phthalate and phthalate alternatives among couples undergoing IVF treatment.
Wu, Haotian;Ashcraft, Lisa;Whitcomb, Brian W;Rahil, Tayyab;Tougias, Ellen;Sites, Cynthia K;Pilsner, J Richard;
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 65-75
417 views Abstract
2018
Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study.
Lind, Tekla;Holte, Jan;Olofsson, Jan I;Hadziosmanovic, Nermin;Gudmundsson, Johannes;Nedstrand, Elizabeth;Lood, Mikael;Berglund, Lars;Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 238-247
404 views DOI Abstract
2019
Declining realisation of reproductive intentions with age.
Beaujouan, Éva;Reimondos, Anna;Gray, Edith;Evans, Ann;Sobotka, Tomáš;
401 views DOI Abstract
2017
Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Tilborg, Theodora C;Oudshoorn, Simone C;Eijkemans, Marinus J C;Mochtar, Monique H;van Golde, Ron J T;Hoek, Annemieke;Kuchenbecker, Walter K H;Fleischer, Kathrin;de Bruin, Jan Peter;Groen, Henk;van Wely, Madelon;Lambalk, Cornelis B;Laven, Joop S E;Mol, Ben Willem J;Broekmans, Frank J M;Torrance, Helen L;, ;
Vol. 32 , No. 12 , pp. 2485-2495
357 views DOI Abstract
2019
Women from diverse minority ethnic or religious backgrounds desire more infertility education and more culturally and personally sensitive fertility care.
Gameiro, Sofia;El Refaie, Elisabeth;de Guevara, Berit Bliesemann;Payson, Alida;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1735-1745
347 views DOI Abstract
1995
Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients
Balen AH;Conway GS;Kaltsas G;Techatrasak K;Manning PJ;West C;Jacobs HS;;
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. -
345 views Abstract
2019
Definition and validation of a custom protocol to detect miRNAs in the spent media after blastocyst culture: searching for biomarkers of implantation.
Cimadomo, Danilo;Rienzi, Laura;Giancani, Adriano;Alviggi, Erminia;Dusi, Ludovica;Canipari, Rita;Noli, Laila;Ilic, Dusko;Khalaf, Yacoub;Ubaldi, Filippo Maria;Capalbo, Antonio;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1746-1761
343 views DOI Abstract
2020
Corrigendum. Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality.
Racca, A;De Munck, N;Santos-Ribeiro, S;Drakopoulos, P;Errazuriz, J;Galvao, A;Popovic-Todorovic, B;Mackens, S;De Vos, M;Verheyen, G;Tournaye, H;Blockeel, C;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 1008
339 views DOI
2020
Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.
Anguzu, R;Cusatis, R;Fergestrom, N;Cooper, A;Schoyer, K D;Davis, J B;Sandlow, J;Flynn, K E;
338 views DOI Abstract
View All 83 Articles
40
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
65
0
0
0
0
0
Journament

Overall Quality Score

40.4/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.9/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

34.0/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

65.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.