Indexed in Journament

human reproduction (oxford, england)

ISSN 0268-1161· EN

Journal Website Certificate of Indexing
Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
45.5 / 100
Journament Score
Below Average
Ranked #533 of 29,297 scored journals (34,015 indexed)
99 Articles
Scores higher than 98.1% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name hum reprod
Abbreviated Name hum reprod
ISSN 0268-1161
URL http://humrep.oxfordjournals.org

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 31.1 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 23.1
Timeliness 80.0 3.0
Diversity 76.1 26.3
Innovation 70.0 24.1
Community Impact 7.9 4.3
Content Distribution 27.1 89.2
Content Quality — 55.1
Ethics & Transparency — 40.5
Editorial Standards — 33.0
Publication Regularity — 52.9
Geographic Reach — 30.4

Publications Per Year

Articles (99)

2020
The proliferative phase endometrium in IVF/ICSI: an in-cycle molecular analysis predictive of the outcome following fresh embryo transfer.
Mackens, S;Santos-Ribeiro, S;Racca, A;Daneels, D;Koch, A;Essahib, W;Verpoest, W;Bourgain, C;Van Riet, I;Tournaye, H;Brosens, J J;Lee, Y H;Blockeel, C;Van de Velde, H;
612 views DOI Abstract
2017
Parental contributions to early embryo development: influences of urinary phthalate and phthalate alternatives among couples undergoing IVF treatment.
Wu, Haotian;Ashcraft, Lisa;Whitcomb, Brian W;Rahil, Tayyab;Tougias, Ellen;Sites, Cynthia K;Pilsner, J Richard;
Vol. 32 , No. 1 , pp. 65-75
485 views Abstract
2018
Reduced live-birth rates after IVF/ICSI in women with previous unilateral oophorectomy: results of a multicentre cohort study.
Lind, Tekla;Holte, Jan;Olofsson, Jan I;Hadziosmanovic, Nermin;Gudmundsson, Johannes;Nedstrand, Elizabeth;Lood, Mikael;Berglund, Lars;Rodriguez-Wallberg, Kenny;
Vol. 33 , No. 2 , pp. 238-247
475 views DOI Abstract
2019
Declining realisation of reproductive intentions with age.
Beaujouan, Éva;Reimondos, Anna;Gray, Edith;Evans, Ann;Sobotka, Tomáš;
461 views DOI Abstract
2019
Definition and validation of a custom protocol to detect miRNAs in the spent media after blastocyst culture: searching for biomarkers of implantation.
Cimadomo, Danilo;Rienzi, Laura;Giancani, Adriano;Alviggi, Erminia;Dusi, Ludovica;Canipari, Rita;Noli, Laila;Ilic, Dusko;Khalaf, Yacoub;Ubaldi, Filippo Maria;Capalbo, Antonio;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1746-1761
430 views DOI Abstract
2017
Individualized FSH dosing based on ovarian reserve testing in women starting IVF/ICSI: a multicentre trial and cost-effectiveness analysis.
van Tilborg, Theodora C;Oudshoorn, Simone C;Eijkemans, Marinus J C;Mochtar, Monique H;van Golde, Ron J T;Hoek, Annemieke;Kuchenbecker, Walter K H;Fleischer, Kathrin;de Bruin, Jan Peter;Groen, Henk;van Wely, Madelon;Lambalk, Cornelis B;Laven, Joop S E;Mol, Ben Willem J;Broekmans, Frank J M;Torrance, Helen L;, ;
Vol. 32 , No. 12 , pp. 2485-2495
428 views DOI Abstract
2019
Women from diverse minority ethnic or religious backgrounds desire more infertility education and more culturally and personally sensitive fertility care.
Gameiro, Sofia;El Refaie, Elisabeth;de Guevara, Berit Bliesemann;Payson, Alida;
Vol. 34 , No. 9 , pp. 1735-1745
423 views DOI Abstract
2020
Decisional conflict among couples seeking specialty treatment for infertility in the USA: a longitudinal exploratory study.
Anguzu, R;Cusatis, R;Fergestrom, N;Cooper, A;Schoyer, K D;Davis, J B;Sandlow, J;Flynn, K E;
410 views DOI Abstract
1995
Polycystic ovary syndrome: the spectrum of the disorder in 1741 patients
Balen AH;Conway GS;Kaltsas G;Techatrasak K;Manning PJ;West C;Jacobs HS;;
Vol. 10 , No. 8 , pp. -
404 views Abstract
2020
Corrigendum. Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality.
Racca, A;De Munck, N;Santos-Ribeiro, S;Drakopoulos, P;Errazuriz, J;Galvao, A;Popovic-Todorovic, B;Mackens, S;De Vos, M;Verheyen, G;Tournaye, H;Blockeel, C;
Vol. 35 , No. 4 , pp. 1008
401 views DOI
2026
Reproductive outcomes among Canadian-born and immigrant women with infertility in Ontario: a population-based cohort study
Aanchal Mishra, Maria P. Vélez, S Yang, Natalie Dayan
7 views DOI Abstract
2026
From evidence to vision–from <i>Developments</i> to <i>Directions</i>
Kirstine Kirkegaard, Emma J Andrew, Andrew Williams, Christopher L. R. Barratt
30 views DOI
2026
Microbiome and chronic pelvic pain in women: a mini-review
Jonas Vibert, Miloš Stojanov, Tatiana Da Silva, David Baud, Nicola Pluchino
42 views DOI Abstract
2026
Can AI speak endo? A multi-platform evaluation of large language models against ESHRE endometriosis guidelines
Gaetano Riemma, Florindo Mario Caniglia, Camilla Casolari, Antonio Maiorana, Mauro Cozzolino, Vittorio Agrifoglio, Pasquale De Franciscis, Luigi Cobellis, Raffaela Carotenuto, Andrea Etrusco
33 views DOI Abstract
2026
Stem cell-based embryo models: scientific promise clashes with ethical reality
Michele Boiani, Hans-Werner Denker
46 views DOI Abstract
2026
Incidence and factors associated with premature ovarian insufficiency: a population-based cohort study
J N Macintyre, J Pudwell, J Shellenberger, M P Velez
50 views DOI Abstract
2026
Progesterone-based ovulation timing versus LH surge monitoring in true natural cycle frozen embryo transfer: impact on live birth rates in a prospective cohort study
Turgut Aydin, Nadiye Koroglu, Edis Kahraman, Nazli Albayrak, Elif Kose
41 views DOI Abstract
2026
Metabolic imaging for gamete and embryo assessment through advanced microscopy technologies: a novel avenue for artificial intelligence?
Fabrizzio Horta, Denny Sakkas, Shannon Handley, Yaoxi Xiong, Bettina Mihalas, Rebecca Deans, Roger J Hart, Robert B Gilchrist, Ewa M Goldys
47 views DOI Abstract
2026
Reply: Stem cell-based embryo models: scientific promise clashes with ethical reality
Alfonso Martinez Arias, Nicolas Rivron, Shahragim Tajbakhsh, Josephine Johnston, Cantas Alev, Laure Bally-Cuif, Elvan Böke, Tommaso Cavazza, Emma Cave, David Cyranoski, Laurent David, Miguel A Esteban, Jianping Fu, Niels Geijsen, Nienke De Graeff, Jacob H Hanna, Nick Hopwood, Maneesha S Inamdar, Fredrik Lanner, Brigitte Leeners, Zhen Liu, Jean Leon Maitre, Gabriella Minchiotti, Naomi Moris, Megan Munsie, Kathy K Niakan, Olivier Pourquie, Vincent Pasque, Martin Pera, Yaojin Peng, Sophie Petropoulos, Sharad Ramanathan, Janet Rossant, Peter Rugg-Gunn, Mitinori Saitou, Karen Sermon, Jose Silva, Thorold Theunissen, Margherita Turco, John Wallingford, Hongmei Wang, Aryeh Warmflash, Jun Wu, Leqian Yu
40 views DOI Abstract
2026
Germinal vesicle oocytes’ rescue: a worthless treatment or a patient-centred approach? Eight years of clinical experience in poor prognosis patients
Danilo Cimadomo, Laura Escrich, Lucía Alegre, Noelia Grau, Arancha Galán, Cristina Rodríguez-Varela, Marilena Taggi, Sara Pasku, Laura Rienzi, Ernesto Bosch, María-José Escribá
77 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
45.5/100 · Below Average
Ranked #533 of 29,297 scored
(34,015 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.
Journament

Overall Quality Score

45.5/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

31.1/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

76.1/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.9/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

80.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

27.1/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.