global health action | Journament

Journal Ranking

#2640 / 33,971
📊 Below Average
Overall Score
41.6/100
Score Breakdown
Engagement
31
Accessibility
35
Timeliness
50
Diversity
30
Innovation
40
Community Impact
34
Ethics & Transparency
0
Content Quality
0
Editorial Diversity
0
Publication Regularity
0
Geographic Reach
0
Updated 1 month ago

global health action

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
Quality Widget - Embed on Your Website

Display your journal's quality scores on your website with our beautiful, self-contained widget. Choose between two embedding methods below.

One-Line JavaScript Embed (Recommended):
Advantages:
  • ✅ Simpler integration (just one line of code)
  • ✅ Better SEO (content is in same DOM)
  • ✅ No iframe limitations
  • ✅ Fully self-contained (no dependencies)
  • ✅ Works on any website regardless of CSS framework
  • ✅ Clickable badges link to full journal page
iFrame Embed Code:
Limitations:
  • ⚠️ Display-only (scores not clickable due to iframe constraints)
  • ⚠️ May have SEO limitations
  • ⚠️ Potential CORS/CSP issues on some websites
Preview:
Indexings
scopus ncbi doaj ulakbim sci soc
Short Name glob health action
Abbreviated Name global health action
ISSN 1654-9880
Aim and Scope
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/zgha20/current
Author Instructions

Publications Per Year

Recent Articles (50 total)

2010
The evolution of HIV policy in Vietnam: from punitive control measures to a more rights-based approach
Vol. 3 , pp. 1-10
609 views Abstract
2017
Why do women not adhere to advice on maternal referral in rural Tanzania? Narratives of women and their family members
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
548 views Abstract
2020
The gender responsiveness of social marketing interventions focused on neglected tropical diseases.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1711335
451 views DOI Abstract
2016
Ebola virus disease surveillance and response preparedness in northern Ghana
Vol. 9 , pp. 1-10
448 views Abstract
2019
Mobilizing community action to improve maternal health in a rural district in Tanzania: lessons learned from two years of community group activities.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1621590
445 views DOI Abstract
2012
Prepared to react? Assessing the functional capacity of the primary health care system in rural Orissa, India to respond to the devastating flood of September 2008.
Vol. 5
418 views DOI Abstract
2015
Preschool overweight and obesity in urban and rural Vietnam: differences in prevalence and associated factors.
Vol. 8 , pp. 28615
416 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of enhanced reminders on postnatal clinic attendance in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1609297
415 views DOI Abstract
2019
The development and pilot testing of an adolescent bullying intervention in Indonesia - the ROOTS Indonesia program.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1656905
414 views DOI Abstract
2019
Association between maternal literacy and child vaccination in Ethiopia and southeastern India and the moderating role of health workers: a multilevel regression analysis of the Young Lives study.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1581467
379 views DOI Abstract
42
Overall
Below Average
31
35
30
40
34
50
0
0
0
0
0

Overall Quality Score

41.6/100

Tier: Below Average

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.6/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

35.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

30.0/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

40.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

33.5/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

50.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Ethics & Transparency Score

0.0/100

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

0.0/100

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

0.0/100

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

0.0/100

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

0.0/100

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.