Indexed in Journament

global health action

ISSN 1654-9880· EN

Login or register to claim ownership or editorship of this journal.
30.4 / 100
Journament Score
Poor
Ranked #19,161 of 29,324 scored journals (34,008 indexed)
50 Articles
Scores higher than 34.6% of scored journals
050100
The Journament Score is computed from platform statistics — reader engagement, accessibility, publication timeliness, keyword breadth, community impact and content distribution — into a single 0–100 figure, recalculated as new articles and metadata are indexed. Dimensions that cannot be measured for this journal are excluded rather than estimated. It is independent of the paid AI Quality Analysis, which never affects this score or the ranking. Full methodology →

About This Journal

Short Name glob health action
Abbreviated Name global health action
ISSN 1654-9880
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/toc/zgha20/current

Quality Profile

7 of 12 dimensions measured
This journal Average of scored journals
Platform statistics — the free Journament Score AI Quality Analysis — separate paid product, ranks nothing

5 of the 12 dimensions could not be measured for this journal. They are left as gaps in the shape rather than plotted as zero.

Show the numbers
Journament quality dimensions for global health action
Dimension This journal Corpus average
Engagement 30.4 30.4
Accessibility 20.0 19.1
Timeliness 0.0 9.2
Diversity 5.6 25.8
Innovation 70.0 27.4
Community Impact 7.1 7.8
Content Distribution 75.2 88.6
Content Quality 55.5
Ethics & Transparency 40.2
Editorial Standards 33.4
Publication Regularity 53.2
Geographic Reach 30.8

Publications Per Year

Articles (50)

2010
The evolution of HIV policy in Vietnam: from punitive control measures to a more rights-based approach
Vol. 3 , pp. 1-10
665 views Abstract
2017
Why do women not adhere to advice on maternal referral in rural Tanzania? Narratives of women and their family members
Vol. 10 , No. 1 , pp. -
567 views Abstract
2020
The gender responsiveness of social marketing interventions focused on neglected tropical diseases.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1711335
489 views DOI Abstract
2019
Mobilizing community action to improve maternal health in a rural district in Tanzania: lessons learned from two years of community group activities.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1621590
482 views DOI Abstract
2016
Ebola virus disease surveillance and response preparedness in northern Ghana
Vol. 9 , pp. 1-10
475 views Abstract
2019
The development and pilot testing of an adolescent bullying intervention in Indonesia - the ROOTS Indonesia program.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1656905
473 views DOI Abstract
2012
Prepared to react? Assessing the functional capacity of the primary health care system in rural Orissa, India to respond to the devastating flood of September 2008.
Vol. 5
469 views DOI Abstract
2019
Effect of enhanced reminders on postnatal clinic attendance in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cluster randomized controlled trial.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1609297
458 views DOI Abstract
2015
Preschool overweight and obesity in urban and rural Vietnam: differences in prevalence and associated factors.
Vol. 8 , pp. 28615
450 views DOI Abstract
2019
Demographic change and HIV epidemic projections to 2050 for adolescents and young people aged 15-24.
Vol. 12 , No. 1 , pp. 1662685
425 views DOI Abstract
2020
The risk of corruption in public pharmaceutical procurement: how anti-corruption, transparency and accountability measures may reduce this risk.
Vol. 13 , No. sup1 , pp. 1694745
351 views DOI Abstract
2020
To start or to complete? - Challenges in implementing tuberculosis preventive therapy among people living with HIV: a mixed-methods study from Karnataka, India.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1704540
289 views DOI Abstract
2020
The gender responsiveness of social marketing interventions focused on neglected tropical diseases.
Vol. 13 , No. 1 , pp. 1711335
489 views DOI Abstract
Journament Score
30.4/100 · Poor
Ranked #19,161 of 29,324 scored
(34,008 journals indexed)
Platform Statistics
AI Quality Analysis
Separate paid analysis — does not affect ranking.

Overall Quality Score

30.4/100

Tier: Poor

The Journament Overall Quality Score is a comprehensive metric that evaluates academic journals across multiple dimensions including engagement, accessibility, diversity, innovation, and community impact.

This score helps researchers, institutions, and publishers understand the holistic quality and impact of a journal beyond traditional metrics.

Engagement Score

30.4/100

Measures user interactions, views, citations, and community involvement with this journal's content.

Higher engagement scores indicate that the journal's content is actively being read, cited, and discussed within the academic community.

Accessibility Score

20.0/100

Evaluates how easily researchers can access journal content, including open access availability, ISSN registration, and indexing.

This metric considers factors such as paywalls, open access policies, and availability across different academic databases and search engines.

Diversity Score

5.6/100

Assesses geographic and institutional diversity of authors, editorial board composition, and topic breadth.

A diverse journal publishes work from various geographic regions, institutions, and covers a broad range of topics within its field.

Innovation Score

70.0/100

Evaluates research novelty, interdisciplinary work, and emerging topics based on AI analysis of article abstracts.

This score reflects how much the journal publishes cutting-edge research, explores new methodologies, and bridges different academic disciplines.

Community Impact Score

7.1/100

Measures scholarly contribution and real-world applications of published research.

This metric evaluates how the journal's research translates into practical applications, policy changes, and benefits to society beyond academia.

Timeliness Score

0.0/100

Evaluates recent publication activity, publication frequency, and currency of research topics.

Higher scores indicate consistent publishing schedules and timely coverage of current research trends.

Content Distribution

75.2/100

Measures how evenly reader attention spreads across the journal's articles, using the Gini coefficient of article clicks.

Higher scores mean readership is distributed across many articles rather than concentrated on one or two.

Ethics & Transparency Score

Not yet measured

Research Integrity (10% weight)

Assesses COPE standards compliance, ethical considerations in research, transparency in methodologies, and reproducibility practices.

This metric ensures the journal maintains high ethical standards and promotes transparent, trustworthy research.

Content Quality Score

Not yet measured

Academic Rigor (20% weight) + Methodology Quality (12%)

Evaluates research methodology soundness, statistical rigor, theoretical framework strength, appropriateness of research methods, data quality, and clarity & readability.

This comprehensive metric ensures published research meets the highest academic standards.

Editorial Diversity Score

Not yet measured

Author Diversity + Interdisciplinary Value (8%)

Measures geographic diversity of authors, institutional variety, editorial board composition, and cross-disciplinary connections.

Diverse editorial teams bring varied perspectives and reduce bias in academic publishing.

Publication Regularity Score

Not yet measured

Assesses consistency of publication schedule, frequency stability, and predictable output patterns.

Regular publication schedules indicate reliable journal operations and consistent workflow management.

Geographic Reach Score

Not yet measured

Evaluates international author representation, global readership distribution, and cross-border research collaboration.

Wide geographic reach indicates global impact and international recognition of the journal's research.